Any meals, sleepovers, rides, vacations, etc. that Kearney provided to the athlete she had the affair with violate NCAA rules regarding "extra benefits."
Any meals, sleepovers, rides, vacations, etc. that Kearney provided to the athlete she had the affair with violate NCAA rules regarding "extra benefits."
Is sex considered an "extra benefit" and, if so, for whom?
Not sure I really want to know wrote:
Is sex considered an "extra benefit" and, if so, for whom?
husbands
This is another major difference between the Applewhite and the Kearney incidents. Applewhite's one-night-stand with the intern did not violate NCAA rules.
I'm not sure she'd even contest the rule as it applies to her (affair).
What she is going to argue is she was not treated equally with regard to her ending of employment, relative to another(s) UT employee.
While I don't think she has a case she can still hope for a settlement.
this will end like the case of dirt ball loren seagrave... he was doing the same with one of his athletes except he got fired immediately. he filed his lawsuit against the university also for wrongful termination. initially he won the case but LSU appealed and a grand jury overturned it. HE WAS WRONG JUST LIKE BEV. case over, it has just taken too long for the truth to come out about what type of person she is. loren still cant get a job at a teaching institution, and that is the way it will end for Bev.
Any coaches wanting to move up one position in 2002 competitions verses UT need to contact NCAA.
billtot wrote:
Any coaches wanting to move up one position in 2002 competitions verses UT need to contact NCAA.
So, since UT has said that there is no NCAA violation, and NCAA has not even bothered to think that there is something here why are you so certain that there is a large set of violations?
Do you actually know the rules (and what the rules were specifically in 2002)? I do not, but since there does not seem to be any smoke, much less fire, it seems that some here might be jumping the gun.
It would be a tedious effort by the NCAA or another school to request the NCAA investigate this, however, the point of the above poster is this.
If Head Coach Kearney was in a relationship with the student-athlete, was there gifts given to student-athlete? Was there dinners paid for, vacations, tickets to the movies, etc?
If there were and they can prove this, then that is an NCAA violation. I am not sure if any of this happened or not. If it did, it could result in this athlete's scoring points being taken away. That is what is being said.
Is giving a student athlete a sex toy an extra benefit?
Hey 26,
The extra benefit rules were posted in the first post of this thread. You should read first, post second to save yourself from further embarrassment. Obviously, any sexual relationship involves rides, over-night stays, movies, meals, etc. All of the "extra benefits" are NCAA violations.
Also, I would say that being fired in a highly published manner constitutes smoke and fire.
I'm not familiar with NCAA rules, but is an SUV an illegal benefit?
Yes, if Kearney purchased a SUV for an athlete on the team, it would be a NCAA violation.