I don't think you should discount academic workload as a factor for poor performance. Personally, I find that it's an excuse, but lack of sleep and recovery really takes its toll on your body as you're gearing up for the end of the season. As a personal aside, I went from an "also-ran" to the national leader in my event merely from an easier course load and more sleep. (By "easier" I mean upper division bioengineering, graduate immunology, cancer biology, etc). I hate excuses, but the timing of XC regionals and nationals during midterms is horrible for MIT athletes.As for the most hated school in DIII NE, I'm going to go with Williams on this one (on principle).
Restcac wrote:
1. Gotta be Williams. Rumor or not, I always enjoyed the description of the Williams top seven as three of the absolute smartest kids in NESCAC and four of the dumbest.
2. Tufts. Blue collar poseurs. Their football team used to bring a shovel to games. Because nothing says working-class like paying $55 grand to major in classics.
3. Amherst. Not all the a******* could get into Williams.
4. Keene. People forget this now that they suck but God, that team was all over the message boards talking themselves up during their brief window of relevance.
5. I don't know, MIT? I never held any particular antipathy towards them but if the guy on the DIII thread claiming the academic workload as the reason they bombed out this season is at all affiliated with the school, they deserve a spot on this list.