Uncle B
This is not intended as a rebuke to you nor a defense of the post, so, respectfully speaking, when you use 'reductio ad absurdum' as a debate response, the absurdity to which you are reducing the argument should be accurate in its reduction. Otherwise, you aren't offering an effective rebuttal. In fact, you merely make your argument look childish and yourself quite silly.
As an example, stating that the "free love"theory was bad because its practice led to problems such as AIDS and unwanted pregnancies is not the same as stating that sex is bad. The original post actually says nothing about sex, of course, but is critical of the "free love" theory, in which promiscuity featured quite prominently.
That is only one example, although I could use any of your responses to illustrate the point. In any case, I'm sure you have better arguments than those you've posted.
At least, I certainly hope you do.