Any guys not circumcised but wish they were??

slice it all off.

brilliant ho wrote:

slice it all off.

I agree. Slice it all off and expose the vagina that every guy has hidden under the base of the penis.

SMJO wrote:

How could circumcised look more normal when it actually isn't? Do you think you would look at a circumcised African woman and say she looks "normal"?

"Normal" in that it's more common than it's not.

Obviously men get on fine with or without it, but just become you're born with something doesn't mean that it's automatically a good idea to keep it. Or do you all leave your Wisdom teeth in place?

Yes I did. I have a normal jaw.

I love my natural junk. I pity all the kutz, poor fools never what it's like to have all your senses engaged. I tried drying it out to see what a kutz feels like, and that's nasty junk. Au natural feels better, and most women I've known love playing with it.

Uncut is fine and it is perfectly possible to keep it clean. It's a good idea to teach him how to keep it clean if you do leave it uncut, though. For example many guys aren't taught to pull back the foreskin when they pee or don't even know that the foreskin can retract, which can lead to problems later on and much cheesiness (and I'm not talking Kenny G)

Of course you could chop his balls off. There's a very real shortage of castrati in modern classical singing.

Here's a really interesting article on this:

Or Not To Snip? Slate's findings on circumcision and sex

http://www.slate.com/id/2136062/

The main conclusion is that sex with a circumcised penis is like a good bottle of wine, whereas sex with an uncircumcised penis is like a great glass of wine. Take from that what you will.

Also, a circumcised penis is less likely to contract hiv during unprotected sex:

Mohels to Mozambique: The case for genital mutilation.

http://www.slate.com/id/2148034/

Finally, maybe you don't want to do it this way (what with the herpes and the dying and all):

Oral Sects: A new campaign against bloodsucking circumcision.

http://www.slate.com/id/2133654/

Beef curtain wrote:

Imagine the uproar if guys insisted that all women be neat and tidy down there. No excess flaps etc.

So, there's this thing called a Brazilian Wax, and it hurts like a b!tch, yet guys seem to request that women get this done fairly often. Yes, "often" is the keyword there, because it requires upkeep. This is completely tangent to the question at hand, I'm just saying, let's not pretend that guys don't ask women to do very painful things for beauty.

Uncircumcised and never had a problem with it "scaring" the women (including a nurse I dated). In fact it was something "extra" they could play with. Some viewed it as exotic, wild, "mandingo". BTW I'm currently happily married so obviously it didn't keep from getting a wife.

Also never had an infection. Never had problems with condoms. Never had a problem keeping it clean.

If you look at old school porn vs new school porn, most of the male actors now are uncircumcised. "The 'skin is in" (like natural boobs, and waxed/shaved 'ginas).

The only logical reason to get circumcised is for religious purposes (Abraham's covenant with Yahweh/God). Other than that, unless your son is literally a retard, he should be able to keep it clean and infection free.

Yea, mine was the first uncut tool that my last sig. other played with. she said she'd gone down on 2 or 3 other uncut guys. she was giving me an HJ and then proceeded to lotion it up. so i was like whaaa. then again she didnt blow me, even though we've talked about it. i hope she wasnt freaked out.

gone down on cut** guys

Intact Johnson wrote:

The only logical reason to get circumcised is for religious purposes (Abraham's covenant with Yahweh/God). Other than that, unless your son is literally a retard, he should be able to keep it clean and infection free.

There are some studies that suggest uncircumcised males have a higher propensity for contracting HIV, the reasoning being that the skin on the underside of the foreskin is more receptive to the virus. There are also studies which have suggested that uncircumcised males are more likely to develop penile cancer. While neither condition has been proven to be directly influenced through the presence of the foreskin, it does give parents a non-religious, non-aesthetic reason to consider circumcising their newborn sons.

i'm not

but

got my boy done

Women are generally a little squeamish about going down on uncut men for fear they do not have good hygiene. Honestly, even if a man has good hygiene (and this goes for women as well), the folds gather all sorts of things: fuzz, secretions, sweat, and by the end of a hot, humid day a high level of stink has been accumulated.

Just make 'him' a 'her' and your problem is solved. Sure the sex change operation may be a little bit more than the circumcision but it eliminates this pesky problem.

I wish I was intact. So if I had a son, I would NOT snip him. If you make this decision for him, you are taking away his power to decide for himself. Tough to argue with pure logic!

dont do it.

because of past practices there are many cut guys in the US.

Obama health task force is looking into this as a possible tax revenue opportunity.

The cut guys are going to be taxed on the cut portion of their dicks. The tax bite may be mitigated if they can prove they are not Coke drinkers and use a minimum fat in their diets.

I was uncircumsized. Always wished I was. I became a jew before my wedding to please my wife and her family. I got an adult circumcision for it. Boy was it painful. Holy cow. BUT, I actually and a lot happier now, with it snipped.

I would say have it done at birth, doing it at an older age is much more painful from what the doctor told me. If you're cut and happy with it, then get it done for him, too.

And comparing female circumsisions is not the same. That is an opressive act meant to keep the women from feeling any sexual pleasure to keep them from being promiscuous. Male circumcisions are done for other reasons.

That's funny because I know of a few men who wish they weren't circumcised. Daniel Tosh and Howard Stern being just two of them. I'd rather my child resent me for not circumcising, and get it done when he's older, as opposed to having him resent me for circumcising him, and not being able to take it back. No true health benefits and insurance companies are doing away with it because it's considered cosmetic. Why have cosmetic surgery performed on your infant son??