Personally, I know that I would feel bad about having a kid that is destined to have poor English skills. Do people who are morbidly obsese, have Huntington's disease, or who just have miserable lives feel guilty about setting up their child for a miserable existance like their own?
those who are genetically flawed take what sex they can get when they can get it. they are not worried about the retarded kids they will create.
I get the jist of what you want to say but, you need to know that diseases, being overweight and things of that nature that you ASSUME are gonna be 100% transfered to a child are often just a possibility. Have you ever heard people say, Oh, it must have skipped a generation or two. Thats because that was actually happens. Its never 100%, its just a possibility, yes, higher possibilities, but not for sure.
PS, 4/10 (because it sounded like you really didnt know what you were talking about, I had mercy on You)
don't be so harsh. its just not nescesary mate
sheep. if they don't breed, we have nothing to fleece.
Fit wrote:
Personally, I know that I would feel bad about having a kid that is destined to have poor English skills. Do people who are morbidly obsese, have Huntington's disease, or who just have miserable lives feel guilty about setting up their child for a miserable existance like their own?
Have you discussed this with your parents? Seriously.
ever seen fat parents with skinny kids?
Reminds me of a show i saw where the father was informed that his newborn was brain damaged, and he said "that's ok, i'm not too smart myself."
Do some research, please wrote:
I get the jist of what you want to say but, you need to know that diseases, being overweight and things of that nature that you ASSUME are gonna be 100% transfered to a child are often just a possibility.
Speaking of feeling bad about having a kid that is destined to have poor English skills, the correct spelling is gist, not jist. Please don't pretend to act like it was a typo. Oh, and it's transferred, not transfered.
Get over yourself, Dickhead.
Lets take the case of simple minded people. They are generally very poor since they didn't finish high school. They don't have spare income for entertainment purposes. They are not creative enough to entertain themselves, so what is left? They turn to their primal instincts and have lot of sex. This is why there are so many trailer parks and inbred people in the USA.
Hey man, he felt the need to be so self-righteous in his own post, that I felt like some humble pie was in order. By the way, nice little nuance capitalizing the word Dickhead. Bravo.
Do your own research please wrote:
Speaking of feeling bad about having a kid that is destined to have poor English skills, the correct spelling is gist, not jist. Please don't pretend to act like it was a typo. Oh, and it's transferred, not transfered.
The author of that post was writing, not speaking.
Fit wrote:
Personally, I know that I would feel bad about having a kid that is destined to have poor English skills. Do people who are morbidly obsese, have Huntington's disease, or who just have miserable lives feel guilty about setting up their child for a miserable existance like their own?
Man brother, you're making a lot of assumptions here.
1) Poor English skills? Not sure there's an identified gene for that yet.
2) Morbidly obese? This is a choice that people make. While children learn eating and exercising habits from their parents, just because a parent is fat doesn't mean their kids will be.
3) Huntington's disease. Dude, there are lots of people with genetic diseases who decide not to have children of their own. I know some.
Any decision a person makes is between them and their spouse and God (if they believe in God). You can't judge unless you have all the facts. I know a couple of "little people" who decided not to have children of their own, but instead they adopted two "little people" children. They've actually been asked rudely by strangers why they decided to have children. That's insane that a person would ask that question, and in this case they are flat out wrong.
That's a nitpicking correction. Nice job spelling "grammar."
cutter wrote:
That's a nitpicking correction. Nice job spelling "grammar."
That's deliberate on his part. That's his name, as it has always been.
How ironical.
Grammer and Spelling wrote:
The author of that post was writing, not speaking.
Ah, yes, but one wouldn't say, "Writing of feeling bad...," now would they? "Speaking" in these terms is merely used to reference a clause. I never asserted he was actually "speaking," only that he was suggesting a point. Frankly, you would have been better off making a issue of "Please don't pretend to act," which is redundant. You might think of changing your name, but, now that I think about it, the misspelling defines your character much better.
cutter wrote:
That's a nitpicking correction. Nice job spelling "grammar."
It wasn't a nitpicking correction so much as it was an ineffective and almost downright erroneous attempt at saying, "It takes one to know one." But, you are correct in any event.
Do your own research please wrote:
Frankly, you would have been better off making a issue of "Please don't pretend to act," which is redundant.
*an* issue