New York times violates its own policies with Move-on advertisement

"We made a mistake," Times spokeswoman Catherine Mathis was quoted as saying.

Does anyone believe anything the Times says anymore?

They didn't make a mistake. And they did not make a mistake in their flimsy cover up.

The times is a left wing newspaper and has been for years. They have been caught once again in their lies. Now lets see if they actually broke any laws.

I also wonder if the rest of the MSM will report this with any vigor. I won't hold my breath.

Anybody else think that the ad was generally childish and not very clever?

I love how the libs get all pissed about FoxNews when the rest of the media is like 90% liberal.

Fox has a conservative bent compared to the rest of the media yes. But like 85-90% of the media is liberal. They've done studies on this.

bobbyboy wrote:

But like 85-90% of the media is liberal. They've done studies on this.

Who is they?

bobbyboy wrote:

I love how the libs get all pissed about FoxNews when the rest of the media is like 90% liberal.

Fox has a conservative bent compared to the rest of the media yes. But like 85-90% of the media is liberal. They've done studies on this.

Yes, because conservatives never get upset about perceived liberal bias of other news media. Rather they use statments such as the above, as if the term "liberal" is a static, definable, standard from which you could compare anything aginst and have it be statistically vaild.

All this is just another reason to stick to reading just the Economist and the news portion of the WSJ. At least the Brits have a great sense of humor.

YAWN....

Fake outrage is so boring.

To the war-horny Bushbots, 90% of America is left-wing.

Well, if the American public is the real enemy then why are you wasting your bullets on Iraqis? Bring it on!

Thousands upon thousands dead, millions of people displaced, millions of dollars unaccounted for, and you're worried about an ad?

Nate Thurmond wrote:

Thousands upon thousands dead, millions of people displaced, millions of dollars unaccounted for, and you're worried about an ad?

No kidding. Rightwingers can't complain endlessly about "bleeding-heart liberals," only to turn around and throw a hissy fit over non-story like this.

If you want to throw a real hissy fit, why don't you complain about why Larry Craig is still drawing a paycheck. Or have you all forgotten your poncy little hypocrite from Idaho? If you're not complaining about him, we have to conclude that you condone his actions and approve of his behavior.

Notice the left wing strategy.

Change the topic and attack, attack, attack.

Leftie Hypocrite wrote:

Notice the left wing strategy.

Change the topic and attack, attack, attack.

never, ever used by the right.

Thought we'd already had all the "I hate Bush" threads that were possible on this site. The subject is the NYT. Not Bush. Get it straight you piece of shit liberals.

bobbyboy wrote:

Fox has a conservative bent compared to the rest of the media yes. But like 85-90% of the media is liberal. They've done studies on this.

It's pretty funny to see another typical brain dead conservative pull out the old "they've done studies" proving 90% is liberal when anyone with half a brain (and yes, I know that excludes conservatives) knows they haven't. It's true that conservatives are just a bunch marginally functional lemmings (and they do have studies priving that) and as such should be given the same deference one gives the mentally handicapped but even retards need to be scolded from time to time.

thanks for keeping us on topic and presenting a coherent argument.

The NY Times is good for either two things: puppy training or lining the bottom of a bird cage.

baby cakes wrote:

Thought we'd already had all the "I hate Bush" threads that were possible on this site. The subject is the NYT. Not Bush. Get it straight you piece of shit liberals.

My my. Resorting to name-calling now. Childish.

YOU brought up Bush, not us. I didn't see his name mentioned in this thread before your post.

Anyway, the entire "move-on" story is a "change of subject." The "real" subject is how terribly the Iraq occupation is going, and of course, Larry Craig. Let's not forget him.

It's their newspaper, they can break their own rules if they want to. It's not a federal crime.

Dude, they gave the same discount to Giuliani. Yeah, this really is a huge liberal conspiracy...