i abstained from calling names before, but you're utterly retarded if you believe this stuff.
i abstained from calling names before, but you're utterly retarded if you believe this stuff.
Regina pulled a similar line of bullshit. In '96 she was going on about the problems of drugs in track while she had just gotten bumped from the Worlds team a year earlier for testing positive at USAs. Truly a worthless c***.
It's assholes like these that create shit for all the genuine athletes.
Tahri can swear on the Koran that hes clean so that means he must be? I really have heard it all now.
Ghost, you appear to have been "around the block a few times" in running lore - is it your opinion that Khalid Skah was "dirty" back in the 1990's. I have heard mention that he was.
ghost wrote:
Baala and Tarhri have been tested more times than you would believe, and have never failed.
I know perfectly well how often top athletes are tested. But once again, how is this different from any other athlete? All top athletes are tested frequently, and all of them pass all of the tests -- until they're caught. Do you have the slightest clue how many tests Ben Johnson passed during the years he was doping?
Just to reiterate what I said above: I have no idea whether Baala or Tahri are doping, and I agree with you that they should be considered innocent until proven guilty. But not "innocent because they're nice guys." The evidence for or against them is no different than the evidence for or against thousands of other top athletes. As for your hollow assertions that these two are different from other athletes because they're honest and hard-working, Lacasse's case should have shown you how empty that line of reasoning is.