According to the iaaf scoring table, the time is equivalent to a 7:30.4 and a 12:55.3. Not bad for this early in the season.
According to the iaaf scoring table, the time is equivalent to a 7:30.4 and a 12:55.3. Not bad for this early in the season.
closer to 7:35 and 13:00, still very fast.
and 26.59 for 10k :)
Then how come BK ran 12:58 but only 27:35?
LAT wrote:
Then how come BK ran 12:58 but only 27:35?
I can think of one good reason, he ran it after his prime. Maybe if he would have ran an all out 10k a couple of weeks after he ran 12:58 he should've been able to run alot faster then 27:35. also depending on if his training was geared towards 1500/5k or 5k/10k. Other people may be able to answer what kind of training he was doing.
His 2 mile was 7:33.X pace for 3000 how do you figure he would run a slower pace for a shorter distance?
dont use scoring tables wrote:
closer to 7:35 and 13:00, still very fast.
njl2 wrote:
His 2 mile was 7:33.X pace for 3000 how do you figure he would run a slower pace for a shorter distance?
Actually it's 7:34.6 pace for 3000.
same reason that the 200m WR time is faster than the 100m in average speed. You pick it up more as you go.....
who woulda thunk Teg would be sticking it to both Webb and Ritz, and right on the heels on T. Bekele and Mottram?
i did.
"closer to 7:35 and 13:00, still very fast."
Incorrect. He ran 8:07.07 for 2 miles. So for 3200m he'd be about 8:04.00. Since the distance in question is shorter than the race he ran, it is logical to assume he'd run a faster pace, not slower like you suggest (so he goes through 3K in 7:35 and then PICKS IT UP!?).
it's 7:31/13:01.
How do you figure? did you fail math class?
calculate wrote:
njl2 wrote:His 2 mile was 7:33.X pace for 3000 how do you figure he would run a slower pace for a shorter distance?
Actually it's 7:34.6 pace for 3000.