There are other factors to be considered but...
If I, Sir Roger Bannister, can do 24 x 200 meters in 29-30 seconds with 30 seconds active rest at a hard but not killing myself effort what can I run a mile in?
Please guesstimate a time.
There are other factors to be considered but...
If I, Sir Roger Bannister, can do 24 x 200 meters in 29-30 seconds with 30 seconds active rest at a hard but not killing myself effort what can I run a mile in?
Please guesstimate a time.
Gold jacket, green jacket, who's give a shit?
3:59.4
depends if the base is there
3:50-4:10
That workout would be ridiculously hard. I used to do 4 sets of 4 "30-30s". It was tough. And that was with a few minutes of rest after each set of 4.
I ran 4:14 when doing that type of workout. If you really did that workout, you've got to be in low 4:00 shape.
In HS, I would do 20 x 200 with equal rest. The fastest I ever went was 31-31. I never really had great speed, so 31s were pretty fast for me. I only went 4:22 off that workout. And what do ou mean by active rest? By the end, 30 seconds is just walking back to the line.
R. Bannister wrote:
There are other factors to be considered but...
If I, Sir Roger Bannister, can do 24 x 200 meters in 29-30 seconds with 30 seconds active rest at a hard but not killing myself effort what can I run a mile in?
Please guesstimate a time.
Bill Dellinger used to say if you could do 16 30/30s you should be able to run 4:00 for the mile. that sounds about right.
24 of them is exceptional.
Shut up troll, you can't do that workout.