KEJELECHA DESTROYED CHEPTEGEI - 26:37 VS 26:53

This Khamis poster is beyond annoying. Anyway carry on.

Understood - you are the opposite of that troll 🧌

And of course I know about Haile's cellphone - that was my point!

LOL. I don't share your faith:

RF Queen: "Athletes nowadays have to dope ..."

Khamis: "Yes doping is needed nowadays ..."

I like that you give me utmost support----this is a must because I'm the only man on LRC, heck on this planet earth, bringing infinite abundant knowledge, insight, understanding, foresight, reason and persuasion to LRC and the world!!!

Cheers :)

Are you really an RF Queen??? As you know "behind every successful man, RF or otherwise, lies a very good woman, RF or otherwise as well". It would be good for you to come onboard my RF train as a model woman but you had better really be a woman in the first place you know???

Yes Haile immediately lost nervous system vitality from late 1999 onwards when he fed himself with a diet of COMPUTERS, and, MOBILE TELEPHONES for the running of his newly build hotels and other businesses like gyms etc. He was lucky to still win the Sydney 10000m by the thick of his vest but was already on a decline long before that!!!

The thing with RF is that it's CUMULATIVE and takes time to destroy your nervous system and the speed of death depends on your individual circumstances like dose, dose frequency in space and time.

I'm not pro-doping by conscious effort, I'm only pro-doping by subconscious chance and temptation, just like any other normal person on the street!!!!

Do you understand rekrunner!!! It's the same for all human beings, we have our URGES, our LUSTS in our subconscious minds/hearts, just as would be the same for you!!! You can't claim you are not pro-sin subconsciously okay??? Sin affects all men and women with no exception.

But the thing with you is that you find the need to stalk me all over LRC in order to conduct surveillance on my comments about your probably (conscious, not only subconscious) pro-doping agenda which ironically seems to add more guilty conscience to the same. Didn't you study psychoanalysis??? The harder the resistance the greater the opposite guilt!!!!!!

I understand your skepticism. After all, there are less than 0.89% women here. But no worries we do exist.

The new Rekrunner. Avoid at all costs.

I'm stalking you? You are the one explicitly bringing me up in various threads, without provocation, with your obsessive and defamatory comments. What if I accused you of being pro-Satan? Show me how you would deny your obvious allegiance to the underworld as proved by your persistent defamatory immoral lies without ironically adding to your guilty conscience to the same, and without your harder resistance showing greater opposite guilt, while feeling no need to stalk me as I accuse you all across LRC in dozens of threads over the next few weeks and months.

For me, the moment had come to wait and see if and when any of your subjective yet baseless statements ever become objective reality.

16 seconds is "disastrous"? 26:53 still puts him in the top-100 performances of all time on the track and top-15 on the road. Not too bad for an Oympic qualifying time in March.

What frightens you when I ask you for objective evidence? After all, these are just words.

What do you fear when "Jebus Christ" posts about your sexuality? Also just words. Now that I mention it, posting you "place a high premium on how LRC folks FEEEEEL me up from head to toe, inside and outside" does seem rather overtly sexually excessive. Maybe you need to find someone to help you release some of these pent-up feelings.

I think at a minimum, you are free to post what you want, but the only thing I want is that you post within the posting guidelines like any reasonable poster, with due respect and honesty for other posters.

I don't know if anyone unequivocally called me pro-doper 10 years ago, and if they did, I don't know on what basis and logic. But I do know recently, a small handful of posters who seem unable to deal with my pro-facts and anti-myth and anti-fallacy agenda, who seek to avoid any intellectually challenging conversation, make things up in order to hide their failure to elaborate their claims with supporting facts, evidence, and controlled observations. There seem to be many unsupported myths surrounding both doping and dopers that require basic fact-checking.

As you just joined, your first year will be just the first of many years. 10 years later, if we are both still here, we can all look back and see what people have been saying about you for 10 years. The extreme difference you strongly protest exists must in fact be the opposite -- extremely the same -- especially when you are a 4-dimensional timelord like me able to look at everything in both SPACE and TIME.

You protest a little too much about your sexuality -- my background in subjective magnetic psychology confirms this is unequivocal proof of the opposite, and such strong protests only confirm the magnitude of your latent guilty conscience. This is way worse than the jay-walker who must also be guilty of murder.

Your adamance and vehemence insisting you are "a straight non-homosexual or transsexual man, non LGBTQ, Christian faithful and righteous, God-loving, God-fearing, God-subjective, RF-intelligent, EMF-gifted, reason and persuasion master!!!!!" speaks so loudly my ears are bleeding. I got the message loud and clear, and I'm not judging you.

Yes with due respect and honesty (you cannot claim otherwise that I'm not honest if you don't allow me to claim you are pro-doper), I truly believe you are pro-doper, and, pro-doping, period!!!

You claim you 'don't know' on what basis and logic but 1) you don't necessary are conscious of the basis and logic in the first place, or 2) prefer to run away from the basis and logic to avoid your guilty conscience. So, stop the stalking of my comments otherwise I'll do you a favor and hit the block button on your name okay? Yes or no??

"a small handful of posters who seem unable to deal with my pro-facts and anti-myth and anti-fallacy agenda, who seek to avoid any intellectually challenging conversation, make things up in order to hide their failure to elaborate their claims with supporting facts, evidence, and controlled observations."

A small handful of posters? Show me objective evidence according to your pro-objective and pro-fact standards. In the lack of a poll or survey, I'm going to need my freedom to subjectively determine that it isn't 1) small, and isn't 2) handful, and isn't 3) merely posters or those who post. Ball's in your court you pervert!!!

Look, don't tell me what to think about whether my protest is extremely different or extremely the same, you don't know 1) me, and 2) don't know how damn good I really am at finding out the susceptibility in space and time. You can't win any argument with me, or be in the right against me the moment I step into the debate hall because you haven't graduated from pre-school and elementary school 'basic fact-checking' level of reasoning. As the word 'basic' suggest, your intellect is pretty basic indeed rudimentary!!!

Yes you reserve the right to call me pro-satan, pro-homosexual, pro-sexual-depravity and would you wanna add pro-doping too??? And yet I don't think you have violated the rules of LRC or its terms and conditions!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! That's how magnanimous and above the terms and conditions I the RF KING AM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

But look at you, squealing like a little wussy that I have violated terms and conditions at the slightest suggesting that you are PROBABLY pro-doping, seriously???? Man up you fool!!!!!

Best advice really: unsubscribe from my channel pls thank you!!! It will do you wonders. For too long nobody on LRC had the iron in them to stand up to you and your fake facade of objectivity, but then came along me the RF King and I won't take your nonsense!!!

Look, speak like a man in public and don't have the moderators delete my posts cuz people won't be able to follow the head and tail of the debate between us. You are making yourself look like a fool replying to comments that suddenly got deleted by you. Show those comments for what it's worth LOL!!!!! Be a big MAN, BE MAGNANIMOUS LIKE ME!!!!!!!

If you qualify your defamation each time with "I subjectively believe based on no objective fact, evidence, or observation or reasonable logic", then I might consider it honest. The mods may still not allow it, but you would have my blessing.

Regarding "a small handful of posters", what I conceded is the few I know of recently, i.e. "I do know recently, a small handful of posters ..." and what I don't know, i.e. "90% of LRC". I was willing to concede "a recent small handful", implicitly relieving you of the burden to show any objective evidence for these recent few, because I can think of about 4 off the top of my head. But we can also play it your way. Lacking any objective evidence from either of us, we can only safely conclude that you are the only one harboring such self-delusions.

I did not tell you to think your protest is extremely the same. You can think what you want. This is what I concluded based on subjective reverse psychology guided by my superior ability to correctly assess events in SPACE and TIME.

I don't need to call you "pro-doping" -- you already confessed it repeatedly in this thread. I can simply take you at your word.

"By posting you acknowledge that you have read and abide by our Terms and Conditions."

"Ball's in your court you pervert!!!"

"Be a big MAN, BE MAGNANIMOUS LIKE ME!!!!!!!"