According to early December 2021 CDC data, "unvaccinated adults were about 97 times more likely to die from COVID-19 than fully vaccinated people who had received boosters".
Is this the data you're referring to about the vaccine costing lives?
According to early December 2021 CDC data, "unvaccinated adults were about 97 times more likely to die from COVID-19 than fully vaccinated people who had received boosters".
Is this the data you're referring to about the vaccine costing lives?
No the data showing the vaccination rates by nations and Covid deaths per capita by nation.
The higher vaxxed nations have the highest death rates.
Pretty simple. Puts the lie to the claim the vaccine has saved lives
The Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine was awarded for discovering use of Pseudouridine to suppress immune responses to synthetic mRNA, and use of that discovery in COVID-19 mRNA vaccines.
This is a case where it is very appropriate that Nobel started this award to allay his own guilt about an invention that killed millions while making him incredibly wealthy. They should rebrand as "The Pfiizer Prize".
...there are no solid, rigorous, methodical prospective study data to which health practitioners can refer to when answering their patient’s questions. All that is available are general platitudes promoted as propaganda by Pharma, the Government, and academic stakeholders such as Drs. Kariko and Weissman (and the Nobel Prize Selection Committee) who have repeatedly, and incorrectly asserted that these synthetic foreign pseudo-mRNA are rapidly degraded in the body after injection. Subsequent research by laboratories from all over the world have demonstrated that this is a false statement - mis- or dis-information - and that these synthetic molecules persist in the bodies of injected persons for weeks to months, rather than the hours originally asserted.
Sadly Malone does not cite any sources for this claim. It sits at the crux his argument, so I assume he would cite them if he had any evidence
...there are no solid, rigorous, methodical prospective study data to which health practitioners can refer to when answering their patient’s questions. All that is available are general platitudes promoted as propaganda by Pharma, the Government, and academic stakeholders such as Drs. Kariko and Weissman (and the Nobel Prize Selection Committee) who have repeatedly, and incorrectly asserted that these synthetic foreign pseudo-mRNA are rapidly degraded in the body after injection. Subsequent research by laboratories from all over the world have demonstrated that this is a false statement - mis- or dis-information - and that these synthetic molecules persist in the bodies of injected persons for weeks to months, rather than the hours originally asserted.
Sadly Malone does not cite any sources for this claim. It sits at the crux his argument, so I assume he would cite them if he had any evidence
Malone will use anything to stay relevant and drive clicks to his income source.
...there are no solid, rigorous, methodical prospective study data to which health practitioners can refer to when answering their patient’s questions. All that is available are general platitudes promoted as propaganda by Pharma, the Government, and academic stakeholders such as Drs. Kariko and Weissman (and the Nobel Prize Selection Committee) who have repeatedly, and incorrectly asserted that these synthetic foreign pseudo-mRNA are rapidly degraded in the body after injection. Subsequent research by laboratories from all over the world have demonstrated that this is a false statement - mis- or dis-information - and that these synthetic molecules persist in the bodies of injected persons for weeks to months, rather than the hours originally asserted.
Sadly Malone does not cite any sources for this claim. It sits at the crux his argument, so I assume he would cite them if he had any evidence
Wow Malone is just making stuff up. Who would have thought.
This is a case where it is very appropriate that Nobel started this award to allay his own guilt about an invention that killed millions while making him incredibly wealthy. They should rebrand as "The Pfiizer Prize".
Me no money
Me no education
Me no like they get recognition
Can’t b e I’m wrong and out of my mind, it’s “Pfizer prize”
Become a Premium Member: https://www.jimmydore.com/premium-membershipGo to a Live Show: https://www.jimmydore.com/tour Subscribe to Our Newsletter: https://m...
This is gold. These two are getting their Nobel Prize while wearing face masks. They obviously don't believe their vax helps them! They also have the intelligence of 2 year olds to not understand that the Covid molecule is smaller than the openings in the mask, like trying to stop a sand storm with a chain link fence.
So Uganda, largely unvaxxed, had hardly any Covid cases. Ditto So. Africa. 170,544 cases in a nation of 42.7 million in Uganda!. Meanwhile, US, which is about 8 times the size of Uganda, has had over 100 million cases. . Hence, despite hardly any Covid deaths, they have a relatively high mortality rate when you figure deaths per case (assuming you #s are true).
This is a bogus analysis.
What matters is Covid deaths per millions of population.
And when we look at that, we see the lower vaxxed nations fared far better.
If we focused on cases per million population, the low vaxxed nations do even better.
So we can say that the low vaxxed nations had far less Covid than the highly vaxxed
