This thread was originally titled, "Incredible development in the $612,000 Transcon Goodge run, currently ongoing" but the new title is more descriptive. The description of the run is here.
27 days in and just past the halfway point. Looks like he is projected to complete his transcon run in 54 total days, which is 29% more time than PK's record.
Paul is basically shooting a promo for Garmin in his last video while simultaneously arguing they are horrible at tracking cadence and steps as the defense for his wild cadence data.
Paul is basically shooting a promo for Garmin in his last video while simultaneously arguing they are horrible at tracking cadence and steps as the defense for his wild cadence data.
Classic.
He's been constantly running with people for 5 days straight and what do you know? His cadence data is near perfect. Funny that we don't see irregularities when there's nowhere to hide. We should expect clean runs from here on out.
If you want to ask for of Garmin data, ask for 1 specific date. What happened for the last 20 miles on March 22nd? What is going on with the second half of that run? How do you register a 0 average cadence over a 2 mile segment?
I'll be following on Strava for any other days, that could prove me wrong, but his March 22 run is the sketchiest cadence data I've ever seen.
StreetFerret proves all you haters wrong about the cadence, trekking poles and data. Even shows you how to download the data from Strava so I don't have to teach you, again. All you haters combined have done nothing remotely even close to what he has shown:
Nobody gives a flying feck about streetferret. It’s a an amateur implementation of a stolen idea run by morons who seem to barely understand running data.
Nobody gives a flying feck about streetferret. It’s a an amateur implementation of a stolen idea run by morons who seem to barely understand running data.
You do realize you and your side of haters took 10 months of me teaching you before you even grasped how to download the data. I don't think you should be disparaging others when most of you still don't get how to download the data even after I, and now StreetFerret, have taught you.
StreetFerret proves all you haters wrong about the cadence, trekking poles and data. Even shows you how to download the data from Strava so I don't have to teach you, again. All you haters combined have done nothing remotely even close to what he has shown:
StreetFerret proves all you haters wrong about the cadence, trekking poles and data. Even shows you how to download the data from Strava so I don't have to teach you, again. All you haters combined have done nothing remotely even close to what he has shown:
Funny, the run they picked is one of the ones I claimed is perfect on cadence right before you posted this. Why didn't they pick the one in question: March 22nd? (Hint: they can't because that data doesn't make sense)
Funny, the run they picked is one of the ones I claimed is perfect on cadence right before you posted this. Why didn't they pick the one in question: March 22nd? (Hint: they can't because that data doesn't make sense)
Because it's an insult to our intelligence that you keep creating new lies every day. A couple weeks ago, you all were accusing PJ of riding at high speeds in the van before I repeatedly proved you all wrong and you all got embarrassed.
StreetFerret proves all you haters wrong about the cadence, trekking poles and data. Even shows you how to download the data from Strava so I don't have to teach you, again. All you haters combined have done nothing remotely even close to what he has shown:
This run was never in question because people ran with him each step and no data was lost or needed for them to fudge.
All the days of almost perfect data is showing the loss of cadence and HR previously to be obvious cheating and not Garmin/pole issues.
That's the problem with you haters. Everything you don't understand you immediately resort to accusing someone of "cheating". I understand the data and taught you all what to look for and there is nothing in it that indicates "cheating". I've seen it all with the cadence and HR long before you even learned from me how to download the data.
StreetFerret proves all you haters wrong about the cadence, trekking poles and data. Even shows you how to download the data from Strava so I don't have to teach you, again. All you haters combined have done nothing remotely even close to what he has shown:
This run was never in question because people ran with him each step and no data was lost or needed for them to fudge.
All the days of almost perfect data is showing the loss of cadence and HR previously to be obvious cheating and not Garmin/pole issues.
This run was doomed from the start. If they had read the FKT site they would have seen that the start and end points are fixed at San Fran and NYC CITY HALL ()
This run was never in question because people ran with him each step and no data was lost or needed for them to fudge.
All the days of almost perfect data is showing the loss of cadence and HR previously to be obvious cheating and not Garmin/pole issues.
That's the problem with you haters. Everything you don't understand you immediately resort to accusing someone of "cheating". I understand the data and taught you all what to look for and there is nothing in it that indicates "cheating". I've seen it all with the cadence and HR long before you even learned from me how to download the data.
That's great, nerd. Maybe these handsome runners will let you suck them off a second time.
That's the problem with you haters. Everything you don't understand you immediately resort to accusing someone of "cheating". I understand the data and taught you all what to look for and there is nothing in it that indicates "cheating". I've seen it all with the cadence and HR long before you even learned from me how to download the data.
That's great, nerd. Maybe these handsome runners will let you suck them off a second time.
Is it any wonder the Reddit mods called your group toxic?