O.K.You may be right .It's useless.I asked you to show whatever the proof many times,and you are not listening and keep on saying ssme things.
Since it semms you are not able to find the anouncement made by IAAF which you claim to said that Yegorova's sample in Paris was not positive one,let's serch together I'll help you.
But before that please recollect wrong information,twised facts ,mind boggling speculation ,and unrational and rude accusations to athletes(if you admit.if not please tell me why).
So first I look at what you said about this .
you said
>>She did not test positive. Again you are repeating what PR said in the press -- but the IAAF is the official body, not PR, and the IAAF said OY's sample was within the range for NORMAL values. Which is NOT a postive test.
So you are saying all the articles saying that Yego tested positive for EPO in Pari was PR.And IAAF didn't say such things and said otherwise.
>>Your message made no sense.Yegorova's sample at Paris was not positive.It was within the range for normal. When the small samples were done that set up the protocol there was a large area that overlapped between "normal" and "positive" for EPO.Yegorova's sample was within that range of normal. That is why the guidelines were set up for further testing. To find out if it was really normal or positive.In all tests her results were always in the range for normal.They were never positive for EPO.
First I couldn't confirm any of the comments about Yegorova here.So we have to find out where you did get these information.
>>But again, the IAAF has looked at the tests and found them to be normal. So I believe that you or wejo or anyone else will not come up with anything.
So IAAF actually said Yegorova's sample in Paris was normal after they suspended her ,right?So this is very very important information.There must be articles which said this on the internet,right?
>>The only ones who know these things, supposedly, are the testing agency and the IAAF -- which when they investigated found Olga Yegorova to be completely INNOCENT.
Seems French federation is the one.IAAF didn't do tests.
>Also, as has been reported on the thread about Boulami, based on the protocol there are statistically going to be a high number of false positives. Which is increduous. It just proves the test is not credible in the first place.
Ah,I finally understood.Isn't is 95% logic,right?First it's not anything you want here.The posters only supposed 95% accurate,of course we don't even know what this means.Not practical logic .of course.Of course whatever this 95% means ,we know it's supposition.Please do not rely on such crap.
So,let's serch .But after I found normally,I couldn't get the article which confirmed any of the comment you made,So first,please give me hints.When did IAAF (or any of the article which confirm what you said ) said that ?When it allowed Yegorova to compete in 5000m?during World championship?or This year?spring august winter summer.Please give me hints.
And did anyeone here say Bauman and Slaney are denying ?Sief and Mourhit are denying of course.It's just the tradition.