Seriously? Which law ? Paying hush money to an adult film star?
Is that what you’re going with? Explain the law he surely broke like you onow what you are talking about
Then call Alan Dershowitz and Jonathon Turley both left leaning scholars who this this was a very very weak case at best.
They think they are helping themselves, the country is do f’ed up in so many areas just look at every poll on everything
The Biden Admin numbers are abysmal. On everything.
Don't play dense. If paying hush money was all they had he wouldn't be indicted. The filing is sealed, but it seems possible that the recent evidence presented to the Grand Jury shows an agreement to use other people's money to pay off accusers to help and announced candidate for federal office. And that the Trump organization business records falsely characterized the payments as part of the cover up.
If all he had done is paid the women out of his own pocket, there wouldn't be a charge.
You are allowed to pay off an affair with a porn star. You are not allowed to pay off with other peoples money.
This will get laughed out of court and everyone but the dumbest people in society understand this.
Even Bragg, dumb as he is, knows this indictment is hot garbage.
You haven't even read the indictment and you already know it will be dismissed. You're like Super-Lawyer or something. You're even better than that Armstrong lawyer. You got this stuff all figured out.
Again, one side supports gun-ownership, individual liberties, and traditional family values - any realistic definition of "fascism" could not include these traits and still be the fascism that any reading of history would consider.
Nobody is above the law but, in the same sense, there is no way a driver is getting pulled over on the highway for going +1 mph over the speed limit. It's called prosecutorial discretion and when you're going after the leader of the party that you've publicly campaigned against, you had better have a rock-solid case for a substantial crime. Any credible voice on the subject knows this case has neither.
The Democrats have a habit of doing this - breaking long-standing legal/political precedence for short-term gain without realizing that this will come slamming back on them in a few years when they are not in power. Every Red state AG now have the precedence to go after basically anyone they want on the Left.
You guys really messed this one up - Democrats, remember how you're feeling right now in ~2-3 years when we round up a bunch of your guys.
The Trump Department of Justice spent quite a bit of time trying to find a reason to 'lock her up'. Previously, the GOP members of Congress held numerous hearing trying to pin something on Clinton. And you are claiming that the Democrats are operating outside the rules of political engagement? Irony may be dead.
The Evangelicals are upset, not because their married hero frequents prostitutes, but because he is being held accountable.
Evangelicals are upset because their prayers were thwarted by their own god. What are they going to do now? Trump wants them in the streets, but it looks like they don't have the guts for it this time around.