This was an incredible performance, three tenths of a second off the world record despite suicidal splits. Going out sub 60 and 2:01.6 made it scarcely credible she would come that close. 62s would have put her in range. And as a result of going out insanely fast, the pacers couldn't stick past 900. Surely a 62/2:04 opening would have led to a 3:49.
Great attempt. Loved watching it. She’s been so consistent her entire career. Hope she gives it another go as she probably learned a lot from this effort.
My college PR of 3:48 came after I ran a tactical 3:55 so she’s there.
She was just an incredible talent early on with that very compact running motion allowing her to use far less energy than Mary Cain in destroying her at World Junior or World Youth. But if there was a time when she might have started using, if at all, it would be 2019, when she made the break down from 3:57 or just under, which she'd run a few years, down to 3:54 in 2019 (age 25 after running 3:56 high already at 19). She continued to drop time from there to 3:50. And if there is any reason to be suspicious in terms of her associations, it's got to be this one:
Athlete Representative Jos HERMENS View Profile Country NETHERLANDS Telephone +31 24 3515077 Mobile +31 6 531 60274 Email
The same arguments being made to justify 3.59 could be just as easily made if she ran 3.44. And they likely will. It's always just "incredible talent". As though no one else has that.
Doping has always started young ehere you have an established doping culture. many of the Ma's Army runners teenagers. And the bio passport ironically encourages this. Dope younger so that subsequent doping does not raise red flags.
Anyway that list I posted is pretty decisive. Sorry but no one is that freakish an athlete. Beating known dopers is a massive doping indication.
Do you think Crouser is doping? He did break the record of a convicted doper.
Probably. Doping is right through sport. All sports.
Something sports fans cannot get their heads around is that even incredibly naturally talented athletes will dope. They desire success just as much as lesser athletes do. Hence, we see "freakish" performances.
This was an incredible performance, three tenths of a second off the world record despite suicidal splits. Going out sub 60 and 2:01.6 made it scarcely credible she would come that close. 62s would have put her in range. And as a result of going out insanely fast, the pacers couldn't stick past 900. Surely a 62/2:04 opening would have led to a 3:49.
+1
That's what I was thinking. The pacing wasn't optimal, shown by Faith allowing a gap early in the first lap. What was the split at 200? 30 point then 31 point would have seen the WR broken.
I noticed you didn't answer the question, but instead asked me one.
For the record, I never said I know what can be run by a clean athlete.
But, we know for a fact that a select few athletes have run 3:50. IF doping gives you 2 - 3% as claimed by several scientists, then we are talking about 5 - 7 seconds. Let's take the lower border, 5 seconds.
Then, if the 3:50 ladies are clean, then they could run 3:45 doped. I consider that unlikely, as no one, doped or clean, came even close to that.
On the other side, even if all top performances are doped, then 3:55 could be run by clean athletes.
The standards for what might seem achievable clean or otherwise are not set in stone. They evolve as athletes improve. Not too long ago the idea of a woman running close to 50 seconds flat, or even under 50 seemed far-fetched. Just because 3:45 does not seem possible for a female athlete today does not mean that standard will still apply in 20 years.
Mondo, Crouser, Warholm, Gidey, Sybney have all pushed up against the boundaries of their respective events. I just don't happen to believe that all great performances and improvements in the sport are fueled entirely by doping.
Improvements aren't made entirely through doping. But the kinds of improvements we see are not made without doping.
Sure, it's possible she was doping at age 16. I guess you believe Sydney was doping at that age as well, along with Mondo, Erriyon Knighton, Zola Budd, Ryun and any other athlete that showed exceptional talent at a young age.
She's doping to run 3.50. Exceptional talent at a young age does not mean she can run the times that only likely dopers can run in their prime.
Faith Kipyegon: Very unlikely that she is doping, but of course I can’t prove it and of course you cannot prove it at the other end either. I invite you to go to Kenya (as I have done and quite recently back in April and May 2022 ), and to observe her training in Eldoret (Kipchoge stadium, get there early around 6 AM) and Kapsabet. She trains with male runners who are quite a bit faster than her and those male runners can run around 339 or faster for 1500 m and the pacer in training requires a quasi daily basis commitment so it is not astonishing that she can run 3:50.00.
It is sad that you immediately think that certain African runners who produce great times are doping. You need to rethink things from the Kenyan perspective and think about the extraordinary motivation these people have about running and the intrinsic and innate talent they have as well which produces these kinds of results.
There are not many economic options for most Kenyans who live in the Rift Valley and their motivation to become top runners is through the roof. What astonishes me in Kenya is that even middle level runners who have very little chance to get races in Europe or overseas continue to devote their lives to running for a number of years and living a very humble and poor lifestyle with minimal food quality (basically Ugali / maize and green veg for example). I’ve seen this time again and it does not really compute, but that is Kenya for you.
She's doping to run 3.50. Exceptional talent at a young age does not mean she can run the times that only likely dopers can run in their prime.
Faith Kipyegon: Very unlikely that she is doping, but of course I can’t prove it and of course you cannot prove it at the other end either. I invite you to go to Kenya (as I have done and quite recently back in April and May 2022 ), and to observe her training in Eldoret (Kipchoge stadium, get there early around 6 AM) and Kapsabet. She trains with male runners who are quite a bit faster than her and those male runners can run around 339 or faster for 1500 m and the pacer in training requires a quasi daily basis commitment so it is not astonishing that she can run 3:50.00.
It is sad that you immediately think that certain African runners who produce great times are doping. You need to rethink things from the Kenyan perspective and think about the extraordinary motivation these people have about running and the intrinsic and innate talent they have as well which produces these kinds of results.
There are not many economic options for most Kenyans who live in the Rift Valley and their motivation to become top runners is through the roof. What astonishes me in Kenya is that even middle level runners who have very little chance to get races in Europe or overseas continue to devote their lives to running for a number of years and living a very humble and poor lifestyle with minimal food quality (basically Ugali / maize and green veg for example). I’ve seen this time again and it does not really compute, but that is Kenya for you.
You left out the fact that doping is rife in Kenya. Maize isn't a high performance drug.
Faith Kipyegon: Very unlikely that she is doping, but of course I can’t prove it and of course you cannot prove it at the other end either. I invite you to go to Kenya (as I have done and quite recently back in April and May 2022 ), and to observe her training in Eldoret (Kipchoge stadium, get there early around 6 AM) and Kapsabet. She trains with male runners who are quite a bit faster than her and those male runners can run around 339 or faster for 1500 m and the pacer in training requires a quasi daily basis commitment so it is not astonishing that she can run 3:50.00.
It is sad that you immediately think that certain African runners who produce great times are doping. You need to rethink things from the Kenyan perspective and think about the extraordinary motivation these people have about running and the intrinsic and innate talent they have as well which produces these kinds of results.
There are not many economic options for most Kenyans who live in the Rift Valley and their motivation to become top runners is through the roof. What astonishes me in Kenya is that even middle level runners who have very little chance to get races in Europe or overseas continue to devote their lives to running for a number of years and living a very humble and poor lifestyle with minimal food quality (basically Ugali / maize and green veg for example). I’ve seen this time again and it does not really compute, but that is Kenya for you.
You left out the fact that doping is rife in Kenya. Maize isn't a high performance drug.
I wonder how much doping there needs to be before it can be considered "rife".
I also wonder, are fast Kenyan performances "rife", in the women's 1500m? What does history say?
Looking at the top 100 women performances, for reference, Jenny Simpson comes in at #100 at 3:57.22 -- more than 7 seconds slower than the world record. Decent, but she is not Laura Muir.
Faith Kipyegon has run an amazing 14 of these top-100 performances, over a period of 10 years since 2013, when she ran 3:56.98.
Helen Obiri has run another 1 -- a 3:57.05 in 2014.
And ... that's it.
How about within 7 seconds of the Chinese Qu Yunxia -- Jackline Maranga comes in at #115 running 3:57.41 in 1998.
Looking further down to all sub-4:00's (or 426 performances) I can only find 3 more: Naomi Mugo, Winny Chebet, and Viola Kibowatt.
How many of these 6 Kenyan sub-4 women have been clearly linked to doping?
You left out the fact that doping is rife in Kenya. Maize isn't a high performance drug.
I wonder how much doping there needs to be before it can be considered "rife".
I also wonder, are fast Kenyan performances "rife", in the women's 1500m? What does history say?
Looking at the top 100 women performances, for reference, Jenny Simpson comes in at #100 at 3:57.22 -- more than 7 seconds slower than the world record. Decent, but she is not Laura Muir.
Faith Kipyegon has run an amazing 14 of these top-100 performances, over a period of 10 years since 2013, when she ran 3:56.98.
Helen Obiri has run another 1 -- a 3:57.05 in 2014.
And ... that's it.
How about within 7 seconds of the Chinese Qu Yunxia -- Jackline Maranga comes in at #115 running 3:57.41 in 1998.
Looking further down to all sub-4:00's (or 426 performances) I can only find 3 more: Naomi Mugo, Winny Chebet, and Viola Kibowatt.
How many of these 6 Kenyan sub-4 women have been clearly linked to doping?
How ironic. When you turn up to defend someone we know they must be doped.
I wonder how much doping there needs to be before it can be considered "rife".
I also wonder, are fast Kenyan performances "rife", in the women's 1500m? What does history say?
Looking at the top 100 women performances, for reference, Jenny Simpson comes in at #100 at 3:57.22 -- more than 7 seconds slower than the world record. Decent, but she is not Laura Muir.
Faith Kipyegon has run an amazing 14 of these top-100 performances, over a period of 10 years since 2013, when she ran 3:56.98.
Helen Obiri has run another 1 -- a 3:57.05 in 2014.
And ... that's it.
How about within 7 seconds of the Chinese Qu Yunxia -- Jackline Maranga comes in at #115 running 3:57.41 in 1998.
Looking further down to all sub-4:00's (or 426 performances) I can only find 3 more: Naomi Mugo, Winny Chebet, and Viola Kibowatt.
How many of these 6 Kenyan sub-4 women have been clearly linked to doping?
How ironic. When you turn up to defend someone we know they must be doped.
So you don't know what you mean by "rife" either?
By looking at history, at all of the Kenyan women in the top-462 fastest performances, which everyone can confirm for themselves, with or without me, who exactly did I "defend"?
How ironic. When you turn up to defend someone we know they must be doped.
So you don't know what you mean by "rife" either?
By looking at history, at all of the Kenyan women in the top-462 fastest performances, which everyone can confirm for themselves, with or without me, who exactly did I "defend"?
You aren't literate enough to play your silly word games. "Rife" is the number of doping busts we have seen in Kenyan running in the last few years. The country has been identified by WADA as having a doping problem.
You only turn up to defend known or suspected dopers. It means we must be on the right track once you start beginning your usual waffle.