Kagan had zero experience as a judge, a trial lawyer, She was a fund raiser. No way she had any qualifications
The only qualification to being a Supreme Court justice is the ability to understand and rule on interpretations of the law at the highest level. Kagan can do that and is therefore qualified.
I don't think you even have to be a lawyer to be nominated to the Court.
The only qualification to being a Supreme Court justice is the ability to understand and rule on interpretations of the law at the highest level. Kagan can do that and is therefore qualified.
I don't think you even have to be a lawyer to be nominated to the Court.
Their exclusion of deserving Asian students should be a scandal but instead was ok'ed by the Justice System
good little boy. Keeping up with his right wing talking points.
You think it is a right wing talking point to defend the right of Asian Students to gain entrance to Ivies based on merit?
Or maybe you don't know about the screwing the Justice Dept handed them?
November 12, 202011:02 AM ET
JACLYN DIAZ
In 2014, an advocacy group first filed a lawsuit, saying that Harvard's race-based considerations for applicants discriminated against Asian American students in process.
Maddie Meyer/Getty Images
A federal appeals court in Boston has ruled Harvard doesn't intentionally discriminate against Asian American applicants in its admissions process.
The panel of judges upheld a federal district court's decision from last year, teeing up a possible case in front of the U.S. Supreme Court.
Circuit Judge Sandra Lynch, who wrote Thursday's decision, agreed with the lower court that "the statistical evidence did not show that Harvard intentionally discriminated against Asian Americans."
You think it is a right wing talking point to defend the right of Asian Students to gain entrance to Ivies based on merit?
Or maybe you don't know about the screwing the Justice Dept handed them?
it's absolutely a right-wing talking point. The entire lawsuit is a strawman to make Harvard get rid of affirmative action programs. it has nothing to do with Asian students; it's cleverly designed to eliminate any admission policies that consider race as a factor.
Right wingers (like you) had no problem with Asian-discrimination as the result of Coronavirus . You aren't "defending" anyone. You are trying to get more mediocre white dudes (see: a mirror) into Ivys and looking to bash "the left".
It would be great if ole Sleepy Joe and his handlers pick the most qualified person for the opening.
However, this will not happen. It is 100% certain that they will choose someone solely based on their race, gender and sexual orientation. Also, they must be a card carrying member of the socialist/communist party.
If it is a PC nominee, I hope that person is put through the ringer every bit as badly as Judge Kavanaugh was.
Like Amy Coney Barrett was extensively qualified. Also please name any black female judges that trump appointed during his term? Zero....nothing. Not a single one. Also you may remember the republicans rushed her through the process right before the election but refused to even vote on President Obama's nomination 7 months before the election, then changed the rules from 60 votes to confirm to a simple majority.
Well the Democrats control the Senate and the VP, which has the tie breaking vote. The next Supreme Court Justice will be an African-American woman. Of the 115 justices, only 7 have not been a white male. What are you afraid of white guy?
It would be great if ole Sleepy Joe and his handlers pick the most qualified person for the opening.
However, this will not happen. It is 100% certain that they will choose someone solely based on their race, gender and sexual orientation. Also, they must be a card carrying member of the socialist/communist party.
If it is a PC nominee, I hope that person is put through the ringer every bit as badly as Judge Kavanaugh was.
Like Amy Coney Barrett was extensively qualified. Also please name any black female judges that trump appointed during his term? Zero....nothing. Not a single one. Also you may remember the republicans rushed her through the process right before the election but refused to even vote on President Obama's nomination 7 months before the election, then changed the rules from 60 votes to confirm to a simple majority.
Well the Democrats control the Senate and the VP, which has the tie breaking vote. The next Supreme Court Justice will be an African-American woman. Of the 115 justices, only 7 have not been a white male. What are you afraid of white guy?
Lets be honest. There almost certainly wasn't a black female judge who was MORE qualified than judges of other "pic your demographic". Statistically, it is very, very, very, very unlikely that there has ever been a black woman judge who was MORE qualified than other judges available at the time to be considered for a Supreme Court appointment.
You think it is a right wing talking point to defend the right of Asian Students to gain entrance to Ivies based on merit?
Or maybe you don't know about the screwing the Justice Dept handed them?
it's absolutely a right-wing talking point. The entire lawsuit is a strawman to make Harvard get rid of affirmative action programs. it has nothing to do with Asian students; it's cleverly designed to eliminate any admission policies that consider race as a factor.
But you knew that.
You actually think Asian Groups -- who saw Asian enrollment a the Ivies drop significantly in recent years -- are working to get rid of black students?
How you figure?
They just don't want their ethnicity being punished.
I think we all know who benefits from the current policies.
Right wingers (like you) had no problem with Asian-discrimination as the result of Coronavirus . You aren't "defending" anyone. You are trying to get more mediocre white dudes (see: a mirror) into Ivys and looking to bash "the left".
Like Amy Coney Barrett was extensively qualified. Also please name any black female judges that trump appointed during his term? Zero....nothing. Not a single one. Also you may remember the republicans rushed her through the process right before the election but refused to even vote on President Obama's nomination 7 months before the election, then changed the rules from 60 votes to confirm to a simple majority.
Well the Democrats control the Senate and the VP, which has the tie breaking vote. The next Supreme Court Justice will be an African-American woman. Of the 115 justices, only 7 have not been a white male. What are you afraid of white guy?
Lets be honest. There almost certainly wasn't a black female judge who was MORE qualified than judges of other "pic your demographic". Statistically, it is very, very, very, very unlikely that there has ever been a black woman judge who was MORE qualified than other judges available at the time to be considered for a Supreme Court appointment.
It would be great if ole Sleepy Joe and his handlers pick the most qualified person for the opening.
However, this will not happen. It is 100% certain that they will choose someone solely based on their race, gender and sexual orientation. Also, they must be a card carrying member of the socialist/communist party.
If it is a PC nominee, I hope that person is put through the ringer every bit as badly as Judge Kavanaugh was.
Anyone other than a white male is a "PC nominee", right?