John Wesley Harding wrote:
moo moo wrote:
So the slower the 400, the faster the mile? I can run a 400 in 65. I should be able to run 4:20 I guess.
This is too stupid for me to waste my time on.
I mean, we get the point you were trying to make. And, the poster above obviously replied with hyperbole. But that was your only argument…that her 400 was a contraindication to her running a fast mile.