Just oneeee more RCT with ivermectin. Plenty have showed it ineffective, but just oneeee more might do the trick. Trust me bro. One more chance. That's all I want.
Plenty have shown the opposite. How many of the “studies” you read are sponsored by or have authors that are paid by Big Pharma, the WHO, or NIH/NIAID?
It's more like you sit on top of your toilet wondering why even geriatrics are clowning you over your poor grammar, spelling and takes on the covid "vaccine."
One goes so far as to suggest there is “cognitive dissonance” among people who have received the vaccine, something that 92+ percent of medical doctors think is safe and effective and recommend right now. To me that is really out of touch with reality. It is like they are so convinced they are correct that they are guessing that everyone out there is second guessing and thinks it is a big mistake now. Yet if you go to a doctor and get a physical right now, they will try and see if you are up to date with a booster. That’s just reality right now.
Just oneeee more RCT with ivermectin. Plenty have showed it ineffective, but just oneeee more might do the trick. Trust me bro. One more chance. That's all I want.
Plenty have shown the opposite. How many of the “studies” you read are sponsored by or have authors that are paid by Big Pharma, the WHO, or NIH/NIAID?
No a single large RCT supports IVM prophylaxis or treatment. Every supposed bit of evidence was either fraud (like Roulet and HCQ) or terrible selection bias in the randomization.
Find something new, this has been litigated and re-litigated so many times.
Also not being able to trust fact checkers because they are being secretly controlled by big Pharma interests along with 92% of medical doctors. you have to go pretty far into the dark side of the information superhighway to find anything you can see and research with your own eyes and believe is true if that is the case
Anyone hear from Malone lately? How about McCullough? Ryan Cole?!? They went away when people started to realize their doom and gloom narrative wasn't going through fruition.
I'm vaxxed 2 years at this point. Anyone know when the long term effects will kick in!? Another month maybe??!!!
Out one side of Vaxxers mouths they shout “science” while out the other they shout “excommunicate the blasphemers”. And they actually think this makes them look good. 😂 Predictable of followers striving to conform.
Nobody said the vaccines will kill or even harm everyone. But they have and are definitely harming and killing millions. Just keep getting mRNA vaccines if you think they’re so safe. Dr. Fauci will be happy to claim more victims.
So many proposed mechanisms they have, but not a shred of evidence to show for them. It's pathetic. Pathetically predictable too.
So many proposed mechanisms they have, but not a shred of evidence to show for them. It’s pathetic. Pathetically predictable too.
It’s ok that all your conspiracies didn’t end up being true. But this isn’t really constructive posting. In this thread we like to discuss evidence that pertains hypothesis about the COVID vaccines.
Anyone hear from Malone lately? How about McCullough? Ryan Cole?!? They went away when people started to realize their doom and gloom narrative wasn't going through fruition.
I'm vaxxed 2 years at this point. Anyone know when the long term effects will kick in!? Another month maybe??!!!
Out one side of Vaxxers mouths they shout “science” while out the other they shout “excommunicate the blasphemers”. And they actually think this makes them look good. 😂 Predictable of followers striving to conform.
Nobody said the vaccines will kill or even harm everyone. But they have and are definitely harming and killing millions. Just keep getting mRNA vaccines if you think they’re so safe. Dr. Fauci will be happy to claim more victims.
“Are definitely” killing millions. This would be such an easy claim to verify - if it were true. Love it.
Plenty have shown the opposite. How many of the “studies” you read are sponsored by or have authors that are paid by Big Pharma, the WHO, or NIH/NIAID?
No a single large RCT supports IVM prophylaxis or treatment. Every supposed bit of evidence was either fraud (like Roulet and HCQ) or terrible selection bias in the randomization.
Find something new, this has been litigated and re-litigated so many times.
Dozens of studies. You simply dismiss these PhDs with the wave of your hand… “Only PhDs that produce studies that support my conclusions count.”
So many proposed mechanisms they have, but not a shred of evidence to show for them. It’s pathetic. Pathetically predictable too.
It’s ok that all your conspiracies didn’t end up being true. But this isn’t really constructive posting. In this thread we like to discuss evidence that pertains hypothesis about the COVID vaccines.
Right. So you understood the purpose of my post to parrot back exactly what bob posted. His posts you like though right? That’s called cognitive bias.
Out one side of Vaxxers mouths they shout “science” while out the other they shout “excommunicate the blasphemers”. And they actually think this makes them look good. 😂 Predictable of followers striving to conform.
Nobody said the vaccines will kill or even harm everyone. But they have and are definitely harming and killing millions. Just keep getting mRNA vaccines if you think they’re so safe. Dr. Fauci will be happy to claim more victims.
“Are definitely” killing millions. This would be such an easy claim to verify - if it were true. Love it.
Right. All the excess deaths being reported in the highly mRNA vaxxed countries are all just SADS. Month after month, excess deaths of up to 6 standard deviations about the long term average… but, that could never be the mRNA vaccine. Yet, you guys count each and every car accident victim who died WITH Covid. More cognitive dissonance.
No a single large RCT supports IVM prophylaxis or treatment. Every supposed bit of evidence was either fraud (like Roulet and HCQ) or terrible selection bias in the randomization.
Find something new, this has been litigated and re-litigated so many times.
Dozens of studies. You simply dismiss these PhDs with the wave of your hand… “Only PhDs that produce studies that support my conclusions count.”
You can search this thread for the owning of the IVM hypers
The role of ivermectin in the treatment of COVID-19 is still under debate, yet the drug has been widely used in some parts of the world, as shown by impressive market data. The available body of evidence may have changed over...
For example, about 3 years ago the bursa sacs on my elbows both filled so that I had what looked like golf balls under the skin. Naturally, I went to a doctor. After a few minute he told me the only solution was surgery. That he had to remove the bursa sacs otherwise the problem would just come back. I thought, that sounds wrong... that sounds like a nonsensical solution. And, I thought, this surgeon must only have a single tool in his toolbox. So, I went a second doctor and got exactly the same opinion. Both doctors were very confident in their opinions. Unconvinced I took to the entertainers on the internet to look for other solutions and found that they could easily be drained with a syringe. So, I ordered a couple online and drained them myself. 3 years later, not a single issue. I have a dozen experiences like this.
I find this story very curious. Did you start out at the surgeon’s or with a pcp? A quick look at any middle of the road medicine site will tell you that normal care starts with conservative care, then, if needed, aspiration, and all of that fails then surgery could be considered. Doing a self-aspiration presents a significant unnecessary risk.
You’re obviously a doctor yourself. I’m happy that you know the correct treatment for filled bursa sacs. What you have said is exactly what I expected to hear when I went in. Clearly, not all doctors are equal. Again, I have a dozen other similar experiences. But, I have encountered high quality doctors who take their profession seriously and keep up. I see Doctors McCullough and Kory as high quality doctors. Have they both yet been excommunicated from medicine for daring to dissent? That kind of blackballing only hurts the medical profession.
Operating a syringe is not a significant unnecessary risk. You’re being arrogant again with that remark.
