Baldy lose wrote:
He is charged. You were completely incorrect while we were correct.
You all argued he was guilty of intentional killing. You were wrong. But any charge means nothing until it is proven.
Alec Baldwin just shot and KILLED a woman on a movie set
Non-Running
-
01
-
Phony AL\' wrote:
Armstronglivs wrote:
Still no response to this point from Phony Al. Do actors never point a gun at anyone in a scene where it is used - such as in a Western, a crime movie, or a war movie? What about when whole battalions of actors are using firearms in a scene? No one is pointing at their actual target? They would be "out of their freaking minds to be pointing the gun at people, even if someone told them it was ok to do so"? Really? What are they pointing their guns at? The sky? The ground? Furthermore, in such scenes is it the standard practice for the actors to be responsible for ensuring the firearms are not loaded with real bullets? Or do they rely on armorers and such to supply them with weapons that are harmless props?
What a strange and insistent attempt at manufacturing a deflection/red herring away from your previous, glaring legal errors. You aren't just a fake lawyer, you suck at posting too.
I provided an answer to your irrelevant question above (albeit to someone else). I don't know how they make movies -- which is still more than you know. As I mentioned above, I'm guessing they don't have actors pointing real guns at each other, but rather use various techniques and equipment to make it just appear that way. Much how like actors don't really punch and kick and assault each other in movies, it just appears that they do. But again, I don't know and neither do you.
But if your uninformed speculation that actors must point real guns at each other in filming is true, I'd bet my next paycheck that they no longer have that practice after the Baldwin events. That is because real lawyers (and common sense) would have told them to stop such a practice (if they even do it) immediately.
You are simply guessing that actors don't point guns at other actors. But if you have seen any shootout where both actors are in the same frame you would see you are wrong. What you cannot grasp is that using guns as props on a film set is not the same as using firearms in everyday life. This is not a red herring - the context of a film set is crucial to the case. It will be argued by the defense. But I quite understand why you don't get that. You are projecting your misconceptions on to a situation in which they do not apply.
31 -
I would further add that if there was a real risk of anyone being shot on a film set we would have seen far more such incidents than have occurred - I know of only one other - and most actors would not consent to being in scenes where firearms are used. They are using either fake guns or firearms that have been disarmed. It is the latter that didn't not occur in the Baldwin case and that was the responsibility of the armorer and assistant director. It should not have been for the actor to check whether they had done their job.
11 -
Special prosecutor just stepped down. At this time it is a win for the defense.
31 -
The hits just keep coming.
32 -
#1086
This post was removed.
-
Baldwin is going to jail.
25 -
bald lose wrote:
Baldwin is going to jail.
Not when they keep losing prosecutors and DA's.
02
What People Are Talking About On LetsRun
Of General Interest
-
Muir and Reekie have falling out with Andy Young, get on first plane home from South Africa
-
Two Black teens may have discovered a proof for the Pythagorean Theorem!!!
-
A Tyrese Cooper Was Killed in February 2023 in a Mall Gang Shooting
-
Rejected or waitlisted everywhere I wanted to attend due to my race