zxcvzxcv wrote:
Unless footlocker has teams, it involves just 32 per gender, so far less risk than 500+coaches/parents. Nike makes decisions like this not to "virtue signal," but because the dollars and cents don't make sense to their bean counters. What do they get? Nothing but liability, since they'd be paying to bring them in, and arguably problems within the state rules concerning events as COVID positives increase in the fall in Oregon.
A small correction: Foot Locker is now 40 individuals per gender, not that it makes much difference. I would imagine State of Oregon restrictions figure a lot more prominently in the Nike decision than liability, though Nike's deep pockets might be greater cause for some liability concerns than I'm allowing.
I guarantee the Running Lane folks are dancing over this decision. Running Lane has a lot more desirable date for a national meet (though California won't think so) to begin with, and this gives them one more year of a solid foot in the door. I expect Running Lane will profoundly impact attendance at at least the Nike South Regional. Southeast, though not a date conflict, could see greatly reduced attendance as well.
Ultimately, California needs to change the date of their state meet if they want to be wrapped into national championship meets going forward. The unintended consequence of NXN shutting down is to put more pressure on the California cross country schedule.