Coincidence, or does this sound like what Sage has?

I thought Sage had lung issues.

But never get reality in the way for some anti vaxx propaganda.

??? She seems fine to me. Qualified for the finals pretty easily, and I'd pick her to win on Saturday.

Coach Sandy's business partner not Klecker's buffalo friend.

Which begs the question, what distance would Sage Hurta and Sage Canaday (when healthy) have the best battle at?

Hurta would hurt-a him (LOL!) pretty badly at anything <10k, so maybe 15k/HM would be a matchup?

Scam 70 wrote:

I thought Sage had lung issues.

But never get reality in the way for some anti vaxx propaganda.

You must be one of those pro-vaxx fanbois trying to justify your mindless sheepism.

byron evans wrote:

Scam 70 wrote:

I thought Sage had lung issues.

But never get reality in the way for some anti vaxx propaganda.

You must be one of those pro-vaxx fanbois trying to justify your mindless sheepism.

Backwards.

Anti-vaxxers are the simpleton lemmings, following Jenny McCarthy et al right off the cliff. What's amazing is the vehement allegiance to idiocy, packaged in delusional self-assurance.

Textbook Dunning-Kruger.

Is it a coincidence that the guy who invented and registered as his user name the world's most idiotic acronym is also a guy who believes that vaccinating against a pandemic virus is a bad idea?

libertariansarestupe wrote:

byron evans wrote:

You must be one of those pro-vaxx fanbois trying to justify your mindless sheepism.

Backwards.

Anti-vaxxers are the simpleton lemmings, following Jenny McCarthy et al right off the cliff. What's amazing is the vehement allegiance to idiocy, packaged in delusional self-assurance.

Textbook Dunning-Kruger.

After the last two years you can honestly say you trust anything the media or "the science" says? They've come out and admitted they've blatantly lied on multiple occasions to protect their agenda. The only person who has been consistently right through this whole pandemic is Bad Wigins who said there would be no more than 2600 deaths for non-elderly people without underlying health complications. And in terms of that healthy population, 99.98% have experienced no issues. Totally overblown. "Science" is now politically driven garbage.

No reason for a healthy person under 35 to get the this experimental vaccine.

Follow common sense not the Fear Mongers.

byron evans wrote:

The only person who has been consistently right through this whole pandemic is Bad Wigins who said there would be no more than 2600 deaths for non-elderly people without underlying health complications.

Wow, that's truly some next-level rewriting of history. Bad Wigins said there would be no more than 2,600 cases of COVID-19 in the U.S. He didn't say anything about "deaths for non-elderly people without underlying health complications."

I've always wondered how people can hold onto crazy beliefs when they conflict with reality, like those people who thought the world was going to end in 2012. I guess it's as simple as altering your memory of what was said. "No, I didn't say the world was going END in 2012, I said it was going to BEND, referring to the re-election of the Evil Obama, which I correctly predicted. It's actually going to end in 2023. I totally guarantee it."

marinara wrote:

Wow, that's truly some next-level rewriting of history. Bad Wigins said there would be no more than 2,600 cases of COVID-19 in the U.S. He didn't say anything about "deaths for non-elderly people without underlying health complications."

Do you mean like the next-level rewriting of history of the lab-origins of the virus or something else...?

Or how the virus was going to kill hundreds of million, possibly a billion, people? And even when they threw every unrelated death on the planet in with the number, you still end up closer to 2600 than what some of the doomsdayers said.

Bad Wigins for president.