Yes.......... wrote:
Rushida has the WR & great PR's. But W.Kipketer was the best 800M runner ever & would've beat Rushida.
WKip couldn't compete in the Olympics during his prime (citizenship issues) so lacks an Olympic Gold. But he beats Rushida. Vs the very best, it was a Varsity runner vs JV runners. He was strong & had gears- better than Rushida's.
I love this discussion it's one that I could talk about all day. I wrote this on another thread that with 2 Olympic Golds , 2 World Golds and of course the WR in an Olympic final running from the front, it's almost impossible to deny Rudisha the crown as the greatest 800m runner ever. I actually think the closest guy to him is Snell, with 2 Olympic golds as well as the WR and a dominance over his contemporaries similar to DR.
But I agree with the OP that Kipketer was the most complete and best 800m runner I have seen and I think in a theoretical race at their absolute bests, Kipketer wins obviously not my a mile, but convincingly.
I think unless you followed middle distance running in the mid to late 90's and in particular the 800m it's easy to not understand what Kipketer did with this event and how he did it. There will always be the insane WR in Zurich where I still don't know he held on to run 1.41.24 off a 48.4 first lap. On this night had he run even 49.0 at the bell, I am certain he would have run 1.40.6/7 - only days later in Koln, he got the pacing better and ran 1.41.11 off 49.4. But the two world titles in 95 and 97 really show his range. In 95 he ran at the back of the race for 500m (something DR could simply not do) and ran 25.2 for the last 200m, including 12.2 for the last 100). 97 is the masterclass though, he takes it out in 49.6, backs off to 1.17.0 at 600m then ramps up again a final 200m in 26.3 to win easily. The construction of that race showcases abilities never seen by an 800m runner other than him. It was the complete definition of toying with a field and using changes in pace to just dominate the field that included the Olympic champion Rodahl who he beat by over a second. Just go and watch these races on youtube, they are works of art with respect to the two laps.
So in a race between the two, we can guess how the script goes - Rudisha will take it out because he has to, but he simply doesn't have the ability to run away from Wilson who we have seen be able to push the limits of sensibility with his first lap in Zurich and still run an elite time. I think running off Rudishas shoulder for 680m makes it a no-brainer. If the pace isn't fast enough Kipketer has better tools in any type of race to win. He accelerates better, can handle changes in pace better - he's just a different type of athlete.
This doesn't detract from Rudisha who got it done when it mattered and people can say that Kipketer didn't which is completely fair. That's why I can't deny Rudisha as the greatest ever. But best is a slightly different thing for me at least. And the best I have seen is Kipketer.