Question for anybody who wants to answer. How are we able to ban certain guns when the constitution clearly states “shall not be infringed?” You would think banning automatic rifles and whatnot is infringement
The second amendment does not mention "guns.' It says the right to bear "arms" shall not be infringed.
I don't think private individuals are allowed to possess tanks, artilleries, fighter planes, strategic bombers, nuclear warheads or aircraft carriers. Aren't they all "arms"?
You’d need to be a moron not to understand when the second amendment was written that nuclear warheads were not available. this amendment is to protect the weak walking amongst us. a gun has never been fired without the hand of man. it’s an inanimate object.
holy smokes! De Santis is truly am empty suit! no wonder they keep him in a shielded bubble and refuse anything besides softball questions.
Come on right wingers. be honest. Do you really buy into this DeSantis stuff? Seriously? The woke mind virus?
DeSantis: “As president, I recognize that the woke mind virus represents a war on the truth so we will wage a war on the woke. We will fight the woke in education, we will fight the woke in corporations, we will fight the woke in the halls of congress.”
The second amendment does not mention "guns.' It says the right to bear "arms" shall not be infringed.
I don't think private individuals are allowed to possess tanks, artilleries, fighter planes, strategic bombers, nuclear warheads or aircraft carriers. Aren't they all "arms"?
You’d need to be a moron not to understand when the second amendment was written that nuclear warheads were not available. this amendment is to protect the weak walking amongst us. a gun has never been fired without the hand of man. it’s an inanimate object.
so your view is that muskets should be allowed because they existed in 1783 but not semi-automatic rifles and handguns? Is that your point? Please clarify.
This post was edited 36 seconds after it was posted.
Question for anybody who wants to answer. How are we able to ban certain guns when the constitution clearly states “shall not be infringed?” You would think banning automatic rifles and whatnot is infringement
If you actually wanted to know, you could read section III of the Heller case that's been mentioned a dozen times in the last 2-3 pages. Or several other easily located SupCou cases that discuss your question in depth.
Are you sure want to go to law school? They actually make you answer questions like the one you just asked, and then they grade you on your ability to do so. And contrary to current popular belief, they won't go easy on you for being a white male. Druthers are afforded to others.
It was a genuine question. I’m a curious person and there are con law experts in our presence. Yes I’m sure. I was hoping you’d write me a letter of recommendation.
Republican presidential hopeful Nikki Haley suggested in an interview that United States forces “need to align” with non-European countries including Russia to enhance global security, a remark her campaign characterized as a...
Rep. Ronny Jackson, a former White House doctor, said President Biden is “not fit mentally or physically" after he fell on stage during a commencement ceremony at the U.S. Air Force Academy.
Woke leftists complained about Trump's executive time but never about Sleepy Joe's complete lack of mental acuity and laziness. Imagine if Trump only held press conferences between noon and 4.
"Aides limit exposing the president to news media interviews when he could make a politically damaging mistake. He has given just a fourth of the interviews Donald J. Trump did in the same time period and a fifth of Mr. Obama’s interviews — and none at all to reporters from a major newspaper."
Woke leftists complained about Trump's executive time but never about Sleepy Joe's complete lack of mental acuity and laziness. Imagine if Trump only held press conferences between noon and 4.
"Aides limit exposing the president to news media interviews when he could make a politically damaging mistake. He has given just a fourth of the interviews Donald J. Trump did in the same time period and a fifth of Mr. Obama’s interviews — and none at all to reporters from a major newspaper."
More 'conservative' worship of autocrats and tyrants. You guys just love a big boss man, don't you? The GOP is telling us very clearly its vision for America and the 'conservatives' like it, giving Trump an 80% approval rating. I think the 'conservatives' are wrong. Do you?
Trump congratulates Kim Jong Un on North Korean election to WHO executive board
You guys do know that kidnapping is illegal, right? Even if it helps a right wing governor? This is something we agree on?
"The Bexar County Sheriff’s Office has officially filed a completed criminal case with the Bexar County District Attorney’s Office regarding the incident from September 2022 in which 49 migrants were flown to Martha’s Vineyard. The case filed includes both felony and misdemeanor charges of Unlawful Restraint. At this time, the case is being reviewed by the DA’s office. Once an update is available, it will be provided to the public."
You guys do know that kidnapping is illegal, right? Even if it helps a right wing governor? This is something we agree on?
"The Bexar County Sheriff’s Office has officially filed a completed criminal case with the Bexar County District Attorney’s Office regarding the incident from September 2022 in which 49 migrants were flown to Martha’s Vineyard. The case filed includes both felony and misdemeanor charges of Unlawful Restraint. At this time, the case is being reviewed by the DA’s office. Once an update is available, it will be provided to the public."
You know no one was kidnapped, right?
You know immigrants are free to travel between states, even to Martha's Vineyard if they choose, right?
You guys do know that kidnapping is illegal, right? Even if it helps a right wing governor? This is something we agree on?
"The Bexar County Sheriff’s Office has officially filed a completed criminal case with the Bexar County District Attorney’s Office regarding the incident from September 2022 in which 49 migrants were flown to Martha’s Vineyard. The case filed includes both felony and misdemeanor charges of Unlawful Restraint. At this time, the case is being reviewed by the DA’s office. Once an update is available, it will be provided to the public."
Of course not! How could it POSSIBLY be illegal if it helps a right winger?
Isn't helping the Trumpettes the very definition of legal?
You guys do know that kidnapping is illegal, right? Even if it helps a right wing governor? This is something we agree on?
"The Bexar County Sheriff’s Office has officially filed a completed criminal case with the Bexar County District Attorney’s Office regarding the incident from September 2022 in which 49 migrants were flown to Martha’s Vineyard. The case filed includes both felony and misdemeanor charges of Unlawful Restraint. At this time, the case is being reviewed by the DA’s office. Once an update is available, it will be provided to the public."
You know no one was kidnapped, right?
You know immigrants are free to travel between states, even to Martha's Vineyard if they choose, right?
I'm not a prosecutor reviewing the evidence and neither are you. Felony charges sounds serious though. I suspect these people were misled to be lured onto the airplane and I'm sure even you would be against that, if true.
