NeverAWMDRF2020 wrote:
The vaccine is pure evil, designed to alter your RNA.
I would rather commit suicide than inject that poison into my healthy body.
Alter your RNA 😂 😂 😂 😂 😂
You cannot make this stuff up.
NeverAWMDRF2020 wrote:
The vaccine is pure evil, designed to alter your RNA.
I would rather commit suicide than inject that poison into my healthy body.
Alter your RNA 😂 😂 😂 😂 😂
You cannot make this stuff up.
2600 bro wrote:
NeverAWMDRF2020 wrote:
The vaccine is pure evil, designed to alter your RNA.
I would rather commit suicide than inject that poison into my healthy body.
Alter your RNA 😂 😂 😂 😂 😂
You cannot make this stuff up.
It doesn’t alter your RNA. It’s molecular mimicry and a brilliant technology at that. However, there are no genuine, peer-reviewed, reliable studies showing long term pharmacokinetic uptake. There are certain organs where the S protein manufacturing technology takes up residence, growing at an exponential rate, especially over the first 72 hours. One of these organs are the ovaries. Interestingly, the amount of women reporting irregular menstrual cycles having not commenced the vaccines is huge and growing, which is not something captured by VAERS. So much so that the FDA and CDC are finally taking a look at it. This may be nothing, but it may be a very big deal down the road.
This is and never was a question of vaxxed vs unvaxxed. It’s immune versus non immune. I would agree that if one hasn’t been infected as of yet, especially if they have significant comorbidities, then they are playing with fire. But those who have been infected and have mounted a response possess T cells and B cells that are durable and adaptive. It may not have happened yet, but there is a very real possibility that the vaccines will, in fact, cause antibody-dependent enhancement, as well as antigenic drift. The time between vaccines allows for this micro evolution of escape variants, especially in and because of the vaccinated.
The smallpox example was a very, very poor example as that virus is a slow mutater, and it doesn’t pool in animal reservoirs as coronaviruses do. It’s impossible to eradicate a highly evolving coronavirus, and, frankly, incredibly risky to mass vaccinate into a pandemic.
*having commenced
What kind of health are we talking about? The vaccine is necessary to inoculate collective immunity. Without it, the virus can continue to spread
ADE is such a bogeyman for the vax "skeptics" now. Sure anything is possible (probabilities after all) but examine prior cases of ADE - it's usually poor affinity or bad antigens. The current Abs generated against the spike protein don't fit the bill at all.
There is ZERO evidence for "vaccine shedding" induced reproductive issues. Shocker that when people are worried about things they report higher freq. of "irregularities." You need good data... not just speculative observations.
I will remind you again that viral infection will result in many many fold higher spike protein production in the body...
Lastly coronaviruses don't actually mutate that fast (they have a proofreading RNA polymerase) - we are just giving it quadrillions of replication events thanks to an ongoing pandemic. We eliminated SARS1 and MERS so you really are just forcing reality to fit your dogma.
Wow this is pretty damning to the whole "fertility" discussion:
ZERO change in implantation rates (or even baseline characteristics) for vaccinated or convalescent anti-spike sero positive women.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666334121000684
99% of the population can only be healthy if they have all been previously vaccinated
This sounds like a metaphor I would bring up if someone said something similarly stupid -
“that’s as dumb as saying ‘why do we need vaccines when 99% of people are healthy’”
No natural immunity in Covid world.
"An independent review conducted by an AllSides staffer in November 2021 found that Brownstone Institute's content typically features arguments from the right side of the political spectrum and rarely, if ever, features opposing points of view."
Just got my 4th COVID shot.
I am so thankful for the miracle of science that allows for a safe & effective COVID vaccine.
Already scheduling my 5th shot for 3 months from now when my cure wears off because it's best to keep your guard up.
Please wear a mask. Thank you, science!
Dr. Anthony Fauci was once a true believer in natural immunity.
Long before the Covid pandemic, on October 11, 2004, to be precise, Fauci appeared on C-SPAN’s Washington Journal. He expressed his professional opinion that if one had a prior infection to a virus, namely the seasonal flu, then one does not need to be vaccinated against it.
“But she’s had the flu for 14 days,” the host said. “Should she get a flu shot?”
Shockingly, Dr. Fauci had a recommendation: No. Because she had prior infection, and thus, natural immunity.
“Well, no,” Fauci replied. “If she got the flu for 14 days, she’s as protected as anybody can be. Because the best vaccination is to get infected yourself.”
“And she should not get it?” the host asked.
“If she really has the flu, if she really has the flu, she definitely doesn’t need a flu vaccine,” he reiterated. “If she really has the flu.”
“She should not get it again this year?” the host asked.
“She doesn’t need it,” Fauci said. “It’s the most potent vaccination — is getting infected yourself.”