To protect the vulnerable 1%? I don't understand.
To protect the vulnerable 1%? I don't understand.
Keykey wrote:
To protect the vulnerable 1%? I don't understand.
It can't be that hard to understand. It really can't. Just think a little harder than you usually do, and the answer will come to you.
Shut and take your jab like a good boy. 200 million dead. Don't be selfish and wear a mask.
Proof that you can, in fact, be too dumb to post things on the internet.
Polio only killed a few thousand kids a year in the US, yet we vaccinated every child for decades!! Why???
Keykey wrote:
To protect the vulnerable 1%? I don't understand.
Because healthy people don't get sick and die and make big bucks for the pharma vaccination eugenicists.
They want to make the healthy people get sick, and to greatly reduce the world population, while making big profits.
But polio could kill any child who caught it and we wanted to protect them. Covid will only kill old fat people. Children and healthy younger people have no reason to be vaccinated. Old people should be vaccinated. Pretty simple.
Plus polio killed way more people and if left unchecked would have overwhelmed our hospitals.
dunes runner wrote:
Polio was and is a paralysis condition caused by exposure to environment pollutants and vaccinations containing toxic substances like lead and mercury.
Pharma has made big bucks while poisoning children and adults for decades with it's toxic vaccinations while making big bucks and they want the travesties to continue.
BRUH you just went full Mullis.
CRINGE
ENJOY YOUR LOSS ??
Unsure how you make the etiological transition there. But I'll play along. Explain further.
Biden the Pedo wrote:
2600 bro wrote:
Why is there zero polio cases in the US now?
It's been supplanted by millions of new cases of ADHD & autism in children leading them to depend on drugs.
You didn't answer the 2nd and 3rd questions: Why are there zero polio cases in the US now? Why does sofosbuvir lead to liver function recovery in HCV patients? Why does HAART lead to T Cell count recovery in AIDS patients?
2600 bro wrote:
Unsure how you make the etiological transition there. But I'll play along. Explain further.
Biden the Pedo wrote:
It's been supplanted by millions of new cases of ADHD & autism in children leading them to depend on drugs.
2600 bro wrote:
Unsure how you make the etiological transition there. But I'll play along. Explain further.
Biden the Pedo wrote:
It's been supplanted by millions of new cases of ADHD & autism in children leading them to depend on drugs.
Figures you just don't get it. That situation in which some semi-well meaning groups 80 years ago has turned into a situation in which we now have various careless & negligent pharma giants fueled by pure greed battling out who will make the most vaccines for every possible thing. the polio vaccine is likely the last and only vaccine we needed to be exposed to and it was and is still controversial. The vaccine killed hundreds in its development and actually had given polio to kids but apparently that was good enough for them to use.
The last 5 decades of vaccine usage has been clearly for pure pharma profit. The vaccine tables have been growing by the the year. You gotta shoot up your kids more and more. The covid vaccine is completely unnecessary.
Be careful what you put in your body.
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/news/government-corruption/what-polio-vaccine-injury-looks-like-decades-later/Because COVID will kill a million people if it runs it's course "naturally". Here in AZ it is the leading cause of death this year in the 20-44 age group. Worse than suicide, homicide, MVCS. These are young people. You should learn some basic math before you start flippant blowing off a game changing solution.
2600 bro wrote:
You didn't answer the 2nd and 3rd questions:
Why are there zero polio cases in the US now?
Why does sofosbuvir lead to liver function recovery in HCV patients?
Why does HAART lead to T Cell count recovery in AIDS patients?
2600 bro wrote:
Unsure how you make the etiological transition there. But I'll play along. Explain further.
Don't need to answer your other two questions. I mean c'mon, a drug is at best unhealthy. At worst, deadly. I can't see why someone would be proud of something that say, prevents liver failure but then eventually causes kidney failure. There's a myriad of short and long term side effects with every drug. No one should ever need to take one.
Biden the Pedo wrote:
Don't need to answer your other two questions. I mean c'mon, a drug is at best unhealthy. At worst, deadly. I can't see why someone would be proud of something that say, prevents liver failure but then eventually causes kidney failure. There's a myriad of short and long term side effects with every drug. No one should ever need to take one.
To jump in...
What about a drug makes it "at best unhealthy?" Sounds dangerously close to a naturalistic fallacy. I could show you 50 compounds found in plants you eat every day and 50 pharmaceuticals and you'd have a hard time telling the two apart.
Indirect cause. Obesity, diabetes, cpd and the list goes on. If the numbnuts in charge specifically the good old usa they’d address the real problem mentioned above. With 70 percent of the population obese or overweight a vaccine will have minimal impact. DHHS, insurance companies really wanting to be proactive and having the best interest of the population would spend dollars and focus on preventing chronic disease leading to this mess. All in the name of big $$$&&
2600 bro wrote:
Why are there zero polio cases in the US now?
Because big pharma changed the name of the paralysis caused by lead, mercury and the other ingredients in their toxic vaccinations.
So you live on drugs, not food, and you question other people's intelligence.
The unfortunate mentality of people promoting toxic vaccinations is rather obvious.
Keykey wrote:
To protect the vulnerable 1%? I don't understand.
Just because the fatality rate is about 1%, doesn't mean that only 1% get severe symptoms. If the virus continues to spread the way it is, it would still kill millions in the US by the time it reaches the entire population. Adding to this, several studies suggest 10%-33% experience long term effects of COVID-19 which are still very much unknown. There have now been several instances where previously healthy individuals who had only minor COVID-19 symptoms would go on months later to develop major blood clots in the lungs and brain, which has a strong possibility of leading to a stroke. We don't know how this will end up affecting the population long term, but if we take note from several previous coronaviruses, people will develop long term health complications as a result which will shorten their life span.