COVID- 19- Evidence of Global Fraud......I'll Try Again

liberal agends

E-man wrote:

The thread was probably deleted because the story is BS.

Then it should be easy to argue your case.

You didn't even read the article.

thank you comrade wrote:

Do you not research where you find your "information'? It's not even a news site, it's just an opinion site from 5 guys who were banned from making any more comments on the Guardian's news. They are known to have a pro-Russian bias.

Too stupid to know you're stupid.

Did you want to list the "news sites" you deem acceptable? As a companion to that list it is mandatory that you list the major funders of that "news" site.

If you think the likes of CNN, Fox, ABC, NBC. NY Times, WaPo, BBC, NPR, The Guardian, etc...are "news" you have been living under a rock for the past two decades.

Beyond that fallacy that you used you know very well you did not read the article for if you had and were honest you would have noted that the article has numerous references to studies within the piece.

Michael Parenti, e.g., is not a news site nor is he welcomed on any news sites yet his scholarship on US foreign policy and US media is beyond reproach. Do you not accept such scholarship?

E-man wrote:

The thread was probably deleted because the story is BS.

Many stories pushing the Covid agenda have been BS.

Yet they are not deleted

Explain how it's BS?

Explain this to me wrote:

Explain how it's BS?

Fearmongering & hype by the radical left to move this country into Democratic-Socialist control. The left controls the MSM as well as Google, YouTube & FB.

Sad times ahead for the U.S.A. ?

So any information not from a "news" source is deemed inaccurate? By that logic, if you told me you ran 5 miles this morning, I can't believe you because it didn't come from a news source. Who cares if it's an opinion piece, all the facts check out if you read it. There are plenty of reliable studies and pieces of information from reputable scientific studies. Read the article before you bash it and try to discredit it. The current censorship of doctors and researchers is also a dangerous thing. There are people who are in control of which "scientific" studies are deemed correct and which doctors can speak on the COVID situation. It's unfortunate. If the official narrative was the truth and everyone was allowed to talk and make their case, we would not need censorship? The truth would stand on it's own.

Calling me stupid? Nice one man, hope you're happy with yourself.

Timothy Foyle wrote:

Explain this to me wrote:

I posted this thread 2 hours ago and it was already deleted? Could someone explain to me why this was deleted? Did the article hit too close to home that it can't be argued and thus it must be deleted because it shows the scam that COVID-19 is?

Really good point. These crackpot conspiracy theory threads deserve so much better. Maybe we could consolidate them all into one thread. Just call it "The Official and Unlimited Crackpot Conspiracy Theory Thread."

You mean the crackpot conspiracy theory that two asymptomatic people cross within six feet of each other for a split second and someone can end up dead from this encounter? But put a $4 mask made in China own both of them and all is good?

Wow, no discussion of the actual contents of the article! Just name calling and bashing the "news" source! Unfortunate to see how close minded and ignorant most of the posters on this site are!

Let's try taking about some key points from the article that you disagree with so we can have a discussion about what this post was intended for.

I honestly don't understand your perspective? Because of the source it's quackery? This view would never get published through a "reputable" or mainstream source because it challenges the official narrative, not truth. If you can't see that, I'm sorry but you are extremely close minded and you're going to struggle with any personal growth in the future. I feel sorry for this way of thinking.

Explain this to me wrote:

Explain how it's BS?

Think about it...we have global leaders that have a hard time agreeing on much and yet they supposedly agree to infect their people with a deadly and debilitating disease. And it’s all to take “control” of these same people that they already control.

This conspiracy is so far out there that even Qanon won’t touch it.

Haha, I'm Canadian, so neither! You really think Biden or Trump should be running the country? I don't believe having president is reasonable in the first place, not that they make any decisions anyways. There's a network behind the scenes that make the decision and push their agenda. Listening to Biden speak proves that. He has no idea what he's saying.

These are not the people that are pushing the agenda. There is a network behind the scenes that makes all the decision. Whether Trump or Biden know of this network or not remains to be seen. I honestly don't think the political figures in the high up positions are very aware of what happens behind the scenes. They are basically just paid actors to play a role in front of the public in the media. Thats why there isn't much change from presidency to presidency. Different face, same control system behind it. Great way to give the illusion of change and democracy though. It divides the public and forces them to pick sides and fight amongst themselves and they are ignorant to where the real control is.

Truth. Depends on which experts and science you choose to believe .

russkie site wrote:

Explain this to me wrote:

off-guardian org/2020/11/17/covid19-evidence-of-global-fraud/

I posted this thread 2 hours ago and it was already deleted? Could someone explain to me why this was deleted? Did the article hit too close to home that it can't be argued and thus it must be deleted because it shows the scam that COVID-19 is?

The scam is your web link site. Off-guardian is a pro-Russia site with promotes quackery including anti-vaccination propaganda:

"In review, OffGuardian reports news with a pro-Russian bias. Many articles are very critical of Ukraine .... OffGuardian also frequently promotes conspiracy theories ... it also cites Mercola, which is a website that promotes quackery level pseudoscience. ... They frequently cover False Flags and the US Deep State conspiracy as well as anti-vaccination propaganda."

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/offguardian/

And your little fact check is liberally funded and backed.

The evidence is abundant and non-stop- any of the fear mongers want to recant:

https://twitter.com/tlowdon/status/1332011494649831424

Lots of C19 admissions are either with and not from and are other issues where they happen to have C19. I know an OR doc who sees at least half from women delivering babies, people with heart issues, etc who test positive for C19 when they get to the hospital.

Ya' gettin' it yet?

https://twitter.com/TheFreds/status/1332071694450700306

The Unkle wrote:

Timothy Foyle wrote:

Really good point. These crackpot conspiracy theory threads deserve so much better. Maybe we could consolidate them all into one thread. Just call it "The Official and Unlimited Crackpot Conspiracy Theory Thread."

You mean the crackpot conspiracy theory that two asymptomatic people cross within six feet of each other for a split second and someone can end up dead from this encounter? But put a $4 mask made in China own both of them and all is good?

Nailed it.

russkie site wrote:

MBFC says so

Media Bias/Fact Check is a propagandist and smearmonger with no claim to authority or fact-checking scholarship at all.

Smear, smear, smear, but you won't get anywhere with intelligent people.