No matter how many times you repeat this nonsense, it does not make your point. You just look more stupid, unless you admit you are trolling.
They are in fact admitting that the so called 'false positives' due to high Ct threshold, ARE people who have the RNA, whether they are still infectious or not.
The reason Australia as a whole has done so well, and the reason NSW has done so much better than Victoria is actually due to:
A)...identifying as much people as possible with the RNA
B)... contact tracing ability.
This contact tracing is even more important on people from higher Ct, because the degrees of separation of contacts has increased exponentially by the time the positive test identified.
Do you actually understand this so far?
The Victorian govt has a commission of inquiry into their second wave outbreak. Their health experts have visited NSW to 'learn from' the NSW testing and tracing protocol. Victoria is now back down to 15 positives yesterday, so called 'false positives' included.
You still here?
NSW is down to two days of no local community positives , nil, nada, nothing...not even a so called 'false positive' out of 17K tests no matter how high the Ct
They found 6 positives from returned overseas travellers in quarantine, from less tests done, ...I suppose these are the 'false positives' you are looking for.
Doesn't it show you that NSW in particular and Victoria playing catch up have actually been successful at their testing and tracing ? The testing and tracing of people with latent virus (high Ct) in particular.
So much so that I have two un-restricted interstate trips booked for business, while you are still in your basement arguing about 'false positives' and viruses that don't exist.