Nick Symmonds speaks out against BLM, deactivates Twitter?

Nick Symmonds is very based! I was very indifferent toward him, never purchased his products or anything, but now I will!

BLM, the organization, is advancing an anti-American, ahistorical, communist, LBGT agenda. Get f***ed.

Leftists have mommy and daddy issues, confirmed!

Also, watch out for the race IQ "realists" here. And yes, realist is 100% facetious.

They'll miss the Flynn effect and the quick time with which scores can be increased outside of the scope of evolution, conflate heritability through environmental conditions with actual genetic markers, assume IQ is a pure measurement of intelligence, and assume there are clear genetic markers for race which is a societal concept based off of skin pigmentation.

Just seeing this

Surprised Nick deleted his Twitter . BLM the group is different from the movement or saying 'black lives matter.'

I bet a lot of people ripping him have no idea.

If he's speaking out against BlM the group I think most Americans would agree with him. If he's saying something else let me know as I'm giving this a 5 minutes look.

Seems like he could have explained the difference and that would have been that. The woke brigade might not have been happy but I think most people would have been fine with it.

I just went to Nick's insta and clicked through and his link tree has a link to fight racism . Funny thing is it solicits dollars to BLM the group.

BLM the group flat out says police don't make us safer, some of its founders are marxists, it's suspicious of nuclear family, its got views way beyond the slogan 'black lives matter' which I'm assuming Nick Symmonds and nearly everyone else on here supports.

Or do some people really think Nick Symmonds is a racist?

Here's his link tree

https://linktr.ee/nicksymmonds

Nick has a big platform and educating people in what he believes seems a better course than getting canceled

Primo Numero Uno wrote:

fasciz wrote:

... and again I must point out that your comprehension is lacking based on your faulty interpretation of their statement.

What's written on the BLM mission statement can be interpreted as "BLM wants to create a system that supports those who do not have the nuclear family available so the nuclear family is not a requirement for success and happiness." This would be an admirable pursuit. Unfortunately, this is projecting what you want them to believe and not what they actually. They have clarified this and you can find examples of interviews with the founders. They do not like the traditional western family structure and want to move away from it. You have to judge the group by what their actual goals are and not what you want their goals to be.

Even white kids without fathers suffer lower results in life. More emotional problems, less discipline, more rebellion, more anger, more violence. Something like 75% of people in prison come from single-parent homes.

Pretending that these problems can be washed away with more Marxism is like pretending that crime will disappear if we just fire all the cops and hire social workers.

All your b.s. is being rejected by the rational American public.

"Nick has a big platform and educating people in what he believes seems a better course than getting canceled"

Walk the walk by limiting censorship of non-PC facts that draw heat on yourself.

wejo wrote:

Seems like he could have explained the difference and that would have been that. The woke brigade might not have been happy but I think most people would have been fine with it.

That's basically what already happened.

sfds wrote:

I love how the left is supposedly not reasonable and then Mr. Authoritarian over here is talking about required nuclear family...

Lol yes affirmative action not THE WAR ON DRUGS. Good one buddy.[/quote]

Keep pretending that 15 year old girls make great fathers, and that it's sexist to think otherwise.

Keep blaming white people every time a black kid has severe behavioral issues due to having no father and no discipline and no respect in his "upbringing".

Keep pretending a 75% single-parent household rate is nothing to prioritize.

The trendy yuppie thing to do is to blame white people, and those lowly working class cops who you are so superior to. You're so superior that you might even adopt a black baby, and become a rockstar on Facebook.[/quote]

I'm not saying single parenthood is desirable at all, but the idea that the government would require a nuclear family is grossly authoritarian.

Maybe we could just, ya know, stop throwing men in prison for smoking weed? If you cared about parents not being around so much, you would acknowledge the destructive nature of the war on drugs on black family structures instead of concern-trolling about affirmative action.

Your tone at the notion of adopting a black child tells us all we need to know though...

I assume Nick got unbearable backlash, perhaps from the track community. Can you imagine what would happen to a professional track athlete who tweeted "I oppose BLM?" He would likely lose his contract and be disinvited, if not blacklisted from meets.

"Stop throwing black fathers in jail for smoking weed"

You swallow every b.s. narrative that black activists feed you. You don't even chew on it for a bit, or do a quick google search.

Yup, most/every absent black dad is just in jail for smoking weed or jaywalking.

Tastes good, so just swallow it! Black activists would never lie to you! Like when they told you that every white person was racist and you resolved yourself to fight white supremacy and free all the good black dads in jail for smoking weed or jaywalking.

Pursuing justice has never been so self-satisfying for you. You're way up here, and these lowly working class whites are way down there, probably eating at McDonalds and keeping the black community down.

Even your screen name hints at a cheese snobbery that distinguishes you from lowly whites who eat American or boring chedder cheese.

ninja turtles wrote:

I assume Nick got unbearable backlash, perhaps from the track community. Can you imagine what would happen to a professional track athlete who tweeted "I oppose BLM?" He would likely lose his contract and be disinvited, if not blacklisted from meets.

Seems strange that WeJo would pretend Nick should have continued standing up to the twitter lynch mob, when WeJo deletes and bans left and right to appease the same woke brigade and advertisers.

And i'm locking this thread to new posts. It's WAY off topic. We're talking about Jewish IQ, West African sprinters, etc. Here is the note I put on page 1.

Note. This thread has gone way off topic and has been locked to new posts, because as is the case with most threads after a few pages, it went way off topic and was getting into talk about Bernie Sanders views on Jewish IQ and Israel thinks that have little to do with the initial topic. The thread was started because Nick Symmonds, who has a link on his intagram page to donate to stop racial injustice, tweeted that he didn't like the BLM the organization. To understand the difference between the slogan "Black Lives Matter" and the official organization, I suggest you read this.

https://fee.org/articles/is-black-lives-matter-marxist-no-and-yes/

sfds wrote:

"Nick has a big platform and educating people in what he believes seems a better course than getting canceled"

Walk the walk by limiting censorship of non-PC facts that draw heat on yourself.

I understand your point. This thread shows a lot of the difficulty in having an ‘open’ forum on the internet .

However I’m banning you. We have community standards and I feel you’ve crossed them. You’re not just posting ‘facts’.

And Robert wanted to shut down this thread . I was pissed to see that. Sure I read some stuff that I found offensive and our mods deleted stuff but it’s ironic he wants to shut it down and I’m banning you yet complaining about cancel culture, but all communities have standards where they draw some sort of line.

Maybe in am we can let the discussion continue but this thread might be to the point it’s just going to be really off topic and requires too much work from moderators.

I don't see why this thread needs to be closed. People still are very interested in this. Threads that quickly get this many posts have often spun out of control.

But people want to comment on this so I'm going to make it registered posters only. Seems like a better compromise to hopefully keep it manageable for moderators.

Please use the report a post function and email me if you want to post something anonymously.

can we post now

solikeliterallyyy wrote:

The kind of weak stuff people get canceled for now is absolutely nothing in comparison to 20, 30 years ago. I'm part of this god-forsaken generation of troll nannies, and I detest it. Go Nick Symmonds.

It's almost like people are becoming less tolerant of bigotry, sexism, homophobia, and racism.

You aren’t as serious or stupid about this post. Little boys like you should learn to read before writing stupidity.

Mr Symmonds needs to accept two things. One, we all say our real thoughts on the internet. Two, you didn't say anything particularly damaging to anyone, and you should be able to handle the criticism, hate, and support you get for your messages.

From my eyes, The fact of the matter is that the country is in a huge mess because of this so called "black lives matter", people have been beaten, robbed, killed, had their stores and livelihood destroyed from vindictive and hateful masked thugs and hooligans. The USA is going to be ripped apart from pandering to narcissistic and crazy people who are trying to get into power with their so called "anti-racism" and "Activism". You haven't even seen the worst of it.