Letsrun front page wrote:
If Mr. Rossi is going to take us up on the $100,000 challenge, we request one week’s notice and have the right to conduct one pre and one post-race drug test. Any positive test (according to WADA standards) or refusal to take a drug test will invalidate our offer.
J.R. wrote:
A one week's notice is quite fair, but asking him to allow invasive and subjective drug tests by you is petty and a major cop out on your part.
rojo wrote:
What's invasive about it? This guy has proven himself to be a course cutter. The only way he could possibly run 3:11 without cutting the course is drugs.
Seriously, a needle in your arm is extremely invasive, and can be quite dangerous too, i.e. people don't know what you're injecting in their bodies. Many people have died just from getting supposedly innocuous injections.
Secondly, you are taking a person's bodily fluids to examine at your leisure, which smacks of perversion to me, and is totally not acceptable.
It's a cop out because any drug test is meaningless and ambiguous, and you have to be a major drug supporter believer to think otherwise. Drugs don't help anyone to run any faster, and if you think so that just sucks, but what you are doing with your constant advertising is that they do and are great, which is total BS.
Regardless of that, any type of supposed performance enhancing drug test is GREATLY SUBJECT TO INTERPRETATION by the testers, by journalists, by the gullible public, and by trolls in the internet, certainly by yourselves who would be out by money and ego when and if Mike Rossi wins.
A good example of interpretation influence is Radcliffe having constant strange test results, deemed perfectly fine, and Yegorova being banned, just because Radcliffe said she is dirty and held up a sign. Another was Jacobs being banned by you on the internet, not surprisingly being banned officially, and with impossible conditions to appeal. Those are a couple of examples, there are many, right in everyone's face right out in public, and one can imagine the total lack of credibility that goes on in private.
Details of procedures nor the people in question's test results ever see light of day.
To try and impose such conditions on a 3:10 marathon is petty and a cop out.
The bottom line is, Mike Rossi breaks 3:10 and you pay, period, or else as far as I'm concerned, any other ludicrous qualifying conditions you want to add on, and he wins.