Maybe it is really this:
Maybe it is really this:
Careful with that last video, the next one that autostarts is potentially offensive.
No shortcuts wrote:
Mike woke up early on a Saturday morning after a gig the previous night just to drive to New Jersey and cheat at a turkey trot to prove he ran a marathon he didn't actually run in a time he is physically incapable of running so he could collect $10,000 he doesn't deserve. He then went home and made a further fool of himself on Twitter. He has had plenty of opportunities since he started his car Saturday morning til now to have a moment of clarity. If he hasn't yet, he probably never will.
Hello everyone. The post above cracked me up.
Anyway, I was on vacation last week and not following this. We apparently got a few emails that Weldon read and he told me Rossi supposedly ran a 20:25. Having read the emails and the great blog post on triathlete guru, it seems to me very likely that Rossi cheated in the 5k. Given his past shenanigans, he doesn't deserve the benefit of the doubt.
Two things make me think he cheated.
1) The chip/gun time differential is very suspicious
The logic of the following is pretty amazing.
Fat hurts wrote:
I sorted the data from the race. 743 runners finished. Rossi started way in the back. Only 29 runners started behind him. This means that to run a legit 20:25 and finish 48th, he would have to pass 667 of the runners in front of him.
Nobody weaves past 667 runners to set a big PR in a 5K. He cheated again.
2) His improvement in a matter of weeks again defies logic as explained below:
Cheat Lie Repeat wrote:
On October 24, 2015, Mr. Rossi participated in the Brain Injury Challenge: Race for Recovery 5K (let the puns begin), with a time of 23:51. This is the race in which he said it was the first race in months, claiming 1st in his age group and 9th overall. Yeah! Atta boy.
On November 14, 2015, he again participated in another 5K, the Rocky Run. In this race, his gun time was 21:49 and net time was 21:46, a mere 3 second difference.
Two weeks later, on November 28, 2015, he participated in the Haddon Heights 5K Turkey Trot (Turkey puns anyone?). In this event, his gun time was 21:07 and net time was 20:25, a 42 second differential. At the finish, in an anticipation of the sub-20 time, he began his provoking and triumphant tweet(s). Oops…he did it again, when the official times were posted, he predictably deleted his tweets immediate post-race tweets and then changes his tune and claims that he had a shoe malfunction (along the lines of wardrobe malfunction) and for his uniformed followers and KoolAid drinkers, went the sympathy root and claimed he sprained his ankle (more puns here) post-race. How convenient. Oh yeah, he then locked his tweeter account confirming that he can dish it out and but he can't take it. So sophomoric, petulant and elementary schoolish.
By the way Mr. Rossi, how did you sprain your ankle? Let me guess, you won't share that information.
Anyway, many people seem worried that he'll cheat and we'll get taken to the cleaners.
dreamin wrote:
I think this will become a messy situation. The brojos were not even near specific enough on what will constitute proof he ran the time. Rossi WILL break 20 (by cheating) and there will be no hard evidence either way. Then what? Are we just to believe him? Without pre-stated requirements for proof, LRC is left with having to DISPROVE that he ran it, which is a tough thing to do.
It will go like this:
"I broke 20, give me my money",
LRC, "No, I don't believe you."
"So you think i cheated? See here's the results, I ran 20:25 last time, I have a picture at the start, I have a GPS file. "
LRC, "I can't prove you cheated, but that's not good enough proof it was legit. The file could be easily tampered with, or you could have an accomplice. You should have videoed it. "
"Well you didn't say that! I fulfilled the requirements you stated and now I'm out of time. Give me my money."
.........And in the end nothing has changed, he claims both races as legit, he says LRC cheated him, and no point was proved.
Let me address those concerns now. This week, I will contact Rossi and his lawyer and tell them that given the concerns raised about the validity of his past performances at Lehigh valley and now this race, we won't pay out unless he runs the time at a race where we are able to verify he ran the full distance. We want at least 72 hours advance notice so we can take a look at the course and figure out if it's possible to cut and if it is, so that we can hire a runner to shadow Rossi during his race to confirm he ran every step.
(Imagine how many runners would love to be our shadower. I'll off them $100 to run next to Rossi for 20 minutes).
There isn't a reason why we can't make that clear to them.
Paying out isn't what I'm worried about - I'm mainly worried Rossi will post a sub-20 somewhere and then be able to convince a few quacks who don't understand running that it was possible he ran 3:11 last year.
Not possible.
I may offer him a $1000 to simply run a 5000 on a track. He gets $1000 if he runs a 5000 on the track before the end of the year. I get to film it. He gets his $1000 (He has to break 22:00 as I don't want him walking it).
What are your thoughts?
Certified distance 5K ? LieRunnr seems to think that the 5K could be any distance.
So much greatness here!!! Thank you for doing more than a weak race director would.
I still say we stick him on a treadmill, set the speed @ 6:20 per mile pace, and see how long he can hold on until he flies off the back.
A perfect live stream, pay-per-view event. I've got my credit card ready.
I think it's a great idea. With the look of his rolled ankle and the pictures of him now in a boot I don't think the end of the year would be possible , Rossi style.
rojo wrote:
I may offer him a $1000 to simply run a 5000 on a track. He gets $1000 if he runs a 5000 on the track before the end of the year. I get to film it. He gets his $1000 (He has to break 22:00 as I don't want him walking it).
What are your thoughts?
I love this idea. Make it even better:
1) Have a pacer go out at 19:59 pace just to make it entirely clear, from a visual perspective, how far off Rossi's fitness is. And how he never was close to being in the type of fitness he was purported to be in at Via.
2) Consider having Ken Stillman drive a golf cart at 19:59 pace ahead of Rossi. I want to see how fast Rossi can run when fueled by pure hate (I'm thinking 21:30).
I don't think Mike Rossi should personally gain from being a blowhard cheater, so tell him you'll donate the $1000 to a charity in his name.
Whatever firefight/police thing he was raising money for that we all donated $3.11 to should do.
titaniumbolt wrote:
rojo wrote:I may offer him a $1000 to simply run a 5000 on a track. He gets $1000 if he runs a 5000 on the track before the end of the year. I get to film it. He gets his $1000 (He has to break 22:00 as I don't want him walking it).
What are your thoughts?
I love this idea. Make it even better:
1) Have a pacer go out at 19:59 pace just to make it entirely clear, from a visual perspective, how far off Rossi's fitness is. And how he never was close to being in the type of fitness he was purported to be in at Via.
2) Consider having Ken Stillman drive a golf cart at 19:59 pace ahead of Rossi. I want to see how fast Rossi can run when fueled by pure hate (I'm thinking 21:30).
That would be epic!
Rossi will never agree to it because $1000 isn't worth the amount of ridicule that he'll receive for being filmed running like a constipated duck for 22 minutes but, even if he declines, the point will be made.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_E6D33XUwn8Fire Barb McKeever! wrote:
... running like a constipated duck ...
In the words of His Rossiness: This. Perhaps a charitable donation to the Martin Richard Foundation with the proceeds when he fails? 1/1/16 would be perfect.$50 would be a bargain. Who is the DJ? Don't say it....
No shortcuts wrote:
I still say we stick him on a treadmill, set the speed @ 6:20 per mile pace, and see how long he can hold on until he flies off the back.
A perfect live stream, pay-per-view event. I've got my credit card ready.
You mean his marathon pace? Yeah, I'd like to see his demeanor after a single 5k.
titaniumbolt wrote:
rojo wrote:I may offer him a $1000 to simply run a 5000 on a track. He gets $1000 if he runs a 5000 on the track before the end of the year. I get to film it. He gets his $1000 (He has to break 22:00 as I don't want him walking it).
What are your thoughts?
I love this idea. Make it even better:
1) Have a pacer go out at 19:59 pace just to make it entirely clear, from a visual perspective, how far off Rossi's fitness is. And how he never was close to being in the type of fitness he was purported to be in at Via.
2) Consider having Ken Stillman drive a golf cart at 19:59 pace ahead of Rossi. I want to see how fast Rossi can run when fueled by pure hate (I'm thinking 21:30).
Something tells me The Chicken Dance will be blaring.
titaniumbolt wrote:
rojo wrote:I may offer him a $1000 to simply run a 5000 on a track. He gets $1000 if he runs a 5000 on the track before the end of the year. I get to film it. He gets his $1000 (He has to break 22:00 as I don't want him walking it).
What are your thoughts?
I love this idea. Make it even better:
1) Have a pacer go out at 19:59 pace just to make it entirely clear, from a visual perspective, how far off Rossi's fitness is. And how he never was close to being in the type of fitness he was purported to be in at Via.
2) Consider having Ken Stillman drive a golf cart at 19:59 pace ahead of Rossi. I want to see how fast Rossi can run when fueled by pure hate (I'm thinking 21:30).
Yes, please do this! I think you should offer to donate the $1k to charity also, that may add some pressure for him to move forward. Don't give him the choice to keep the money because we all know he wouldn't think twice.
rojo wrote:
No shortcuts wrote:Mike woke up early on a Saturday morning after a gig the previous night just to drive to New Jersey and cheat at a turkey trot to prove he ran a marathon he didn't actually run in a time he is physically incapable of running so he could collect $10,000 he doesn't deserve. He then went home and made a further fool of himself on Twitter. He has had plenty of opportunities since he started his car Saturday morning til now to have a moment of clarity. If he hasn't yet, he probably never will.
Hello everyone. The post above cracked me up.
Anyway, I was on vacation last week and not following this. We apparently got a few emails that Weldon read and he told me Rossi supposedly ran a 20:25. Having read the emails and the great blog post on triathlete guru, it seems to me very likely that Rossi cheated in the 5k. Given his past shenanigans, he doesn't deserve the benefit of the doubt.
Two things make me think he cheated.
1) The chip/gun time differential is very suspicious
The logic of the following is pretty amazing.
Fat hurts wrote:
I sorted the data from the race. 743 runners finished. Rossi started way in the back. Only 29 runners started behind him. This means that to run a legit 20:25 and finish 48th, he would have to pass 667 of the runners in front of him.
Nobody weaves past 667 runners to set a big PR in a 5K. He cheated again.
2) His improvement in a matter of weeks again defies logic as explained below:
Cheat Lie Repeat wrote:
On October 24, 2015, Mr. Rossi participated in the Brain Injury Challenge: Race for Recovery 5K (let the puns begin), with a time of 23:51. This is the race in which he said it was the first race in months, claiming 1st in his age group and 9th overall. Yeah! Atta boy.
On November 14, 2015, he again participated in another 5K, the Rocky Run. In this race, his gun time was 21:49 and net time was 21:46, a mere 3 second difference.
Two weeks later, on November 28, 2015, he participated in the Haddon Heights 5K Turkey Trot (Turkey puns anyone?). In this event, his gun time was 21:07 and net time was 20:25, a 42 second differential. At the finish, in an anticipation of the sub-20 time, he began his provoking and triumphant tweet(s). Oops…he did it again, when the official times were posted, he predictably deleted his tweets immediate post-race tweets and then changes his tune and claims that he had a shoe malfunction (along the lines of wardrobe malfunction) and for his uniformed followers and KoolAid drinkers, went the sympathy root and claimed he sprained his ankle (more puns here) post-race. How convenient. Oh yeah, he then locked his tweeter account confirming that he can dish it out and but he can't take it. So sophomoric, petulant and elementary schoolish.
By the way Mr. Rossi, how did you sprain your ankle? Let me guess, you won't share that information.
Anyway, many people seem worried that he'll cheat and we'll get taken to the cleaners.
dreamin wrote:
I think this will become a messy situation. The brojos were not even near specific enough on what will constitute proof he ran the time. Rossi WILL break 20 (by cheating) and there will be no hard evidence either way. Then what? Are we just to believe him? Without pre-stated requirements for proof, LRC is left with having to DISPROVE that he ran it, which is a tough thing to do.
It will go like this:
"I broke 20, give me my money",
LRC, "No, I don't believe you."
"So you think i cheated? See here's the results, I ran 20:25 last time, I have a picture at the start, I have a GPS file. "
LRC, "I can't prove you cheated, but that's not good enough proof it was legit. The file could be easily tampered with, or you could have an accomplice. You should have videoed it. "
"Well you didn't say that! I fulfilled the requirements you stated and now I'm out of time. Give me my money."
.........And in the end nothing has changed, he claims both races as legit, he says LRC cheated him, and no point was proved.
Let me address those concerns now. This week, I will contact Rossi and his lawyer and tell them that given the concerns raised about the validity of his past performances at Lehigh valley and now this race, we won't pay out unless he runs the time at a race where we are able to verify he ran the full distance. We want at least 72 hours advance notice so we can take a look at the course and figure out if it's possible to cut and if it is, so that we can hire a runner to shadow Rossi during his race to confirm he ran every step.
(Imagine how many runners would love to be our shadower. I'll off them $100 to run next to Rossi for 20 minutes).
There isn't a reason why we can't make that clear to them.
Paying out isn't what I'm worried about - I'm mainly worried Rossi will post a sub-20 somewhere and then be able to convince a few quacks who don't understand running that it was possible he ran 3:11 last year.
Not possible.
I may offer him a $1000 to simply run a 5000 on a track. He gets $1000 if he runs a 5000 on the track before the end of the year. I get to film it. He gets his $1000 (He has to break 22:00 as I don't want him walking it).
What are your thoughts?
Whatever circumstantial evidence comes out, you'll never get him to admit he cheated. The only thing is hard proof as in a video of him stepping off/on to the course or crossing the startline at a pedestrian pace.
For him, it's all about plausibility to the non-runner, since almost every runner already knows he cheated. Is it possible that his shoe came off. Sure, it was double knotted, someone stepped on the back of his shoe and it popped off so he had to undue the double knot, put the shoe back on and tie it back up. About the 667 people he passed. Well the 2013 video shows that the start line is quite wide and the first km or so of the race is a straightaway, so maybe he didn't need to weave that much and could have passed that many people. Are these things likely? No. But are they a possible explanation? Maybe.
I'm hopefully that something will still come out since unlike Via, where the questions about cheating only came out many months after the race, this should be fresh in people's minds and pictures/videos on their phones are undeleted. If he had run the race, presumably, one of the 600 odd people that he passed would have remembered a guy running 6:25 pace streaming past them, but I'm presuming that no would would be willing to stepforward to say that, because no one saw him do it.
titaniumbolt wrote:
rojo wrote:I may offer him a $1000 to simply run a 5000 on a track. He gets $1000 if he runs a 5000 on the track before the end of the year. I get to film it. He gets his $1000 (He has to break 22:00 as I don't want him walking it).
What are your thoughts?
I love this idea. Make it even better:
1) Have a pacer go out at 19:59 pace just to make it entirely clear, from a visual perspective, how far off Rossi's fitness is. And how he never was close to being in the type of fitness he was purported to be in at Via.
2) Consider having Ken Stillman drive a golf cart at 19:59 pace ahead of Rossi. I want to see how fast Rossi can run when fueled by pure hate (I'm thinking 21:30).
Three pacers. One at 19:59 pace and one at 3:12 pace and the last at 3:25 pace.
And video it.
Loofa Dog wrote:
titaniumbolt wrote:I love this idea. Make it even better:
1) Have a pacer go out at 19:59 pace just to make it entirely clear, from a visual perspective, how far off Rossi's fitness is. And how he never was close to being in the type of fitness he was purported to be in at Via.
2) Consider having Ken Stillman drive a golf cart at 19:59 pace ahead of Rossi. I want to see how fast Rossi can run when fueled by pure hate (I'm thinking 21:30).
Three pacers. One at 19:59 pace and one at 3:12 pace and the last at 3:25 pace.
And video it.
And have the pacers dressed like this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y4QIYb2cN-YThat should end this... if someone has to follow him, it's over. He was only ever going to run under 20 minutes by cheating.
To be honest, this is a kindness to him. It will end his pathetic charade (that he could ever run a 5k under 20 minutes) and, with the holidays coming, he can focus on more important things. He'll rely on the injury to give up the dream which he will say is tragic as he was just so close... darn shoe malfunction.
I doubt it will be the end of his cheating at races though. His ego will require that he keep cheating to get those goal times, not for the money, but to keep lying and deceiving those closest to him. It's not like he's going to stop wearing that Boston hat. Can you even imagine? What a truly horrendous life - when your main goal is to deceive the very people to whom you should never have to lie. Just ugly. And all just so he can say he ran Boston??? Reminds me of a quote in the trial at end of A Man for all Seasons, which I will alter slightly to fit:
"For Boston? Why, Mike, it profits a man nothing to give his soul for the whole world . . . But for Boston!"
rojo wrote:
Let me address those concerns now. This week, I will contact Rossi and his lawyer and tell them that given the concerns raised about the validity of his past performances at Lehigh valley and now this race, we won't pay out unless he runs the time at a race where we are able to verify he ran the full distance. We want at least 72 hours advance notice so we can take a look at the course and figure out if it's possible to cut and if it is, so that we can hire a runner to shadow Rossi during his race to confirm he ran every step.
(Imagine how many runners would love to be our shadower. I'll off them $100 to run next to Rossi for 20 minutes).
Awesome! Honest Mike will jump at this chance to redeem himself.
As for the shadower: pick me! Most other people here have shown clear signs of a prejudice.
Would you mind if we run on the track? Say in 19:45, to keep it fair?