dreamin wrote:
I think this will become a messy situation. The brojos were not even near specific enough on what will constitute proof he ran the time. Rossi WILL break 20 (by cheating) and there will be no hard evidence either way. Then what? Are we just to believe him? Without pre-stated requirements for proof, LRC is left with having to DISPROVE that he ran it, which is a tough thing to do.
It will go like this:
"I broke 20, give me my money",
LRC, "No, I don't believe you."
"So you think i cheated? See here's the results, I ran 20:25 last time, I have a picture at the start, I have a GPS file. "
LRC, "I can't prove you cheated, but that's not good enough proof it was legit. The file could be easily tampered with, or you could have an accomplice. You should have videoed it. "
"Well you didn't say that! I fulfilled the requirements you stated and now I'm out of time. Give me my money."
.........And in the end nothing has changed, he claims both races as legit, he says LRC cheated him, and no point was proved.
The problem with the bet is the advanced notice issue. I would have put something like 14 business days given and location of race including start/finish locations.