RossiCheated wrote:
Sadly, Rossi is successfully shifting the battleground.
He can't win an argument about whether he ran Lehigh. If he could he would already be filing lawsuits for defamation.
He won't want to address the money on offer (you watch how fast he goes with "no comment" or "I was exonerated" or "I'd take that money but I'm hurt and they know it, so the offer is illegitimate" or some other crap that isn't, "Awesome! I ran that time once and I'll run it again for $100,000!" if a reporter asks him about it).
So, he attacks the weak link (and I'll admit, LoserMikeRossi, who we presume to be Ken, has written some things that get into dangerous territory) and shifts the conversation to one where he has a fighting chance of winning.
If he sues Ken it will allow him to position himself as a "victim who was exonerated and just wants to move on and this guy tried to hurt my business and family." There are a lot of bullies who claim victim status when someone punches back. Sometimes it works. The general public could view some of the punches as low blows and would sympathize with the cheater.
Focusing on DJ politics and personal vendettas instead of the $100,000 offer is stupid.
Stop trying to be the teacher on the playground. ... grown men shouldn't need referees for social interactions.