Did Mike Rossi (viral marathon dad) cheat his way into Boston?

Stop already with the accomplice thing. Why would you get someone else involved unnecessarily. They would have to hand off a number after the start in front of other people, that alone is more risky than going solo. Not to mention how hard it is to keep a secret once more than one person knows.

He intentionally picked a small race and took a chance they would still have no mats. And he never thought he would have this level of scrutiny that the letter brought upon him. He would've gotten away with it had he just quit while he was ahead.

Ken in all due respect run a few races and you'll see how silly the accomplice theory really is and how it actually adds more risk than going solo.

Reg, if you knew what I have found out you wouldn't be so pessimistic.

Until I posted you only suspected Mike was here. I outted Mike. And I've she'd a lot a light on what a horrible human he is. What have you done except call him names? And how do we know you're a runner? Maybe you're 400 pounds and live in your car.

Here's why the accomplice theory is stupid: it involves Mike Rossi having a friend capable of running close to 3:11 pace for a marathon.

Mike Rossi is a cheater and liar

If weighed 400 pounds then why would I be on this fvcking site? I am a runner idiot.

Stop talking about running.

I live in my car.... better that than paying a mortgage with money I stole from married couples.

You didn't return those people's money or videos until the news did an investigative tv story on you and the state sued you. Disagraceful.

Grassy Knoller wrote:

Here's why the accomplice theory is stupid: it involves Mike Rossi having a friend capable of running close to 3:11 pace for a marathon.

Good point and according to Ken he doesn't have any friends, let alone one who's capable of 3:11 and close enough of a friend to keep his big secret. It was a solo effort, if anyone was involved it was his wife keeping a look out, holding bib covering clothes, driving the car, who knows, oh yeah I forgot, Ken knows.

WhoTF knows. wrote:

Grassy Knoller wrote:

Here's why the accomplice theory is stupid: it involves Mike Rossi having a friend capable of running close to 3:11 pace for a marathon.

Good point and according to Ken he doesn't have any friends, let alone one who's capable of 3:11 and close enough of a friend to keep his big secret. It was a solo effort, if anyone was involved it was his wife keeping a look out, holding bib covering clothes, driving the car, who knows, oh yeah I forgot, Ken knows.

+1

Ken is a good runner wrote:

LoserMikeRossi wrote:

Until I posted you only suspected Mike was here. I outted Mike. And I've she'd a lot a light on what a horrible human he is. What have you done except call him names? And how do we know you're a runner? Maybe you're 400 pounds and live in your car.

If weighed 400 pounds then why would I be on this fvcking site? I am a runner idiot.

Stop talking about running.

I'm pretty sure that Ken is here to talk about Mike Rossi. If you know of another message board where Rossi's cheating is still being investigated and discussed, you could always point him there.

Otherwise, quit the personal attacks and stfu!

This thread would never be poised as it is to hit 10,000 posts were it not for Ken luring Rossi into posting on this forum. Even though I don't agree with everything that he posts, he's been a key player on this thread - runner or not.

Ken what is the furthest you have ever run in your life?

faster than you are wrote:

Ken is a good runner wrote:

If weighed 400 pounds then why would I be on this fvcking site? I am a runner idiot.

Stop talking about running.

I'm pretty sure that Ken is here to talk about Mike Rossi. If you know of another message board where Rossi's cheating is still being investigated and discussed, you could always point him there.

Otherwise, quit the personal attacks and stfu!

This thread would never be poised as it is to hit 10,000 posts were it not for Ken luring Rossi into posting on this forum. Even though I don't agree with everything that he posts, he's been a key player on this thread - runner or not.

Bitch please.

I've been here since page 1... Ken 250.

His idiotic comments about an accomplice are rivaled only by his refusal to stop talking about running...something he know nothing about.

Was he a key player when all the people who put real evidence on this thread stopped talking to him? What part of the photo analysis was his, the creation of a spreadsheet, or the inital dissemination of information like sarab?

He is here because of a vendetta cause he got insulted by Mike or because he is competing in the wedding industry. He just makes fun of Rossi's hair and his marriage and his wedding dj jobs.

So why don't you take a seat in the corner and STFU yourself.

Why does everybody want to see this thread get to 10000 posts without actually doing anything to get him dqed?

Half these posts have been +1 and repeated comments.

Grassy Knoller wrote:

Here's why the accomplice theory is stupid: it involves Mike Rossi having a friend capable of running close to 3:11 pace for a marathon.

You are assuming it's a friend. My thought proces is that he hired somebody.

I drew Mike Rossi out from behind his various screen names. I helped show exactly what kind of scum Mike is. I initiated the FB group that started taking all the evidence private so it could looked at objectively and with proper follow-up. I created a spreadsheet of over 45 runners that Mike should have passed, according to his times, and SarahB's group is using the establish which are the best witnesses. And I gave other runners input with regards to other lines of thinking with evidence that would further prove Mike Cheated.

What have any of you done except sit there and called Mike names and try and troll us into going over each others house and get in a fist fight?

LoserMikeRossi wrote:

Grassy Knoller wrote:

Here's why the accomplice theory is stupid: it involves Mike Rossi having a friend capable of running close to 3:11 pace for a marathon.

You are assuming it's a friend. My thought proces is that he hired somebody.

Stillman, you may have thoughts but there's no process involved, either in this thread, your business or anything you say or do, the difference between you and Mike Rossi are poles apart, Mike's out in front and it's daylight between him you. Now take your medication and get to bed.

Daylight wrote:

LoserMikeRossi wrote:

You are assuming it's a friend. My thought proces is that he hired somebody.

Stillman, you may have thoughts but there's no process involved, either in this thread, your business or anything you say or do, the difference between you and Mike Rossi are poles apart, Mike's out in front and it's daylight between him you. Now take your medication and get to bed.

I'm closer than you think. And it's all concrete. Mike should be worried. He's going to regret ever trying to intimidate me.

This is not true. As a race entrant of course you can contact the race organiser, ask whether there will be official splits, and receive an honest answer.

LoserMikeRossi wrote:

... But the one bit of information he could not confirm was how many timing mats there would be. You just can't call the RD or the timing company and ask them.

LoserMikeRossi wrote:

Daylight wrote:

Stillman, you may have thoughts but there's no process involved, either in this thread, your business or anything you say or do, the difference between you and Mike Rossi are poles apart, Mike's out in front and it's daylight between him you. Now take your medication and get to bed.

I'm closer than you think. And it's all concrete. Mike should be worried. He's going to regret ever trying to intimidate me.

Dream on, Mike's not worried about anything on this thread.