Bump.
Bump.
only God knows wrote:
always seemed unfair that people expect someone who completed a race over a year ago is supposed to now prove they did it. I think the marathon should have to prove they did not. Also seems there should be a reasonable time after which things stand. I have no idea if anyone did or did not run a certain distance in a certain time but just seems unfair if the guy is in the video and at the finish and his bib registered at the beginning and end then how can you DQ him? Because you say he wasn't capable of that? No way you can know that, 3:11 is not that fast and someone could do that. Some people crank that out easy their first time. Because he is not in photos? troubling and maybe suspicious but come on, a year later and that is the determinant? Where in the rules does it say you must be photographed on the course or be subject to a DQ? even if the guy was photographed on the course most of you would still deny he did it just because that is what you want to believe
this thread is really a mean-spirited joke with a lot of obsessive and weird behavior
Another reminder that Mike Rossi is a POS! Thank you for this. I love how incredibly idiotic these posts are - yup, 3:11 is easy - that's why Mike always runs a 3:11 - when he cheats! Very good post. hilariously ridiculous. Why even bother having a qualifying time for Boston greater than 3:11, since anybody can run it! So good!
Excellent work - remember, he didn't just cheat, he's also a POS - who expects people to swallow this crap whole.
I'm with you greenfan and this is the sort of lengths they go to, https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1s0f2sI8FvoD4nFriEngQQXhwBqYbVLq0V5VjI2ARRp4/edit?pli=1#gid=0 they're either trolls or obsessed, I think both. And you're right "no evidence proving his guilt has been offered" and this was established not just by the RD but also USATF, that's the USA Track & Field national governing body. But still the idiots on here won't accept it and keep telling everyone new evidence is forthcoming from these investigative groups which is never going to happen.
greenfan wrote:
Suffering from paranoia? That's what I mean about posters here, no one is credible and no evidence proving his guilt has been offered. The facts stand that he received his BQ time and there were absolutely no grounds to DQ him. Surely someone would have seen him step off the course in a major marathon like that. Weren't hundreds of people asked if they saw anything unusual? They did a thorough investigation and the facts remain. Whoever is trying to defame him here should get out there and work just as hard and see that improving a lot can happen with smart training.
Bloviator wrote:Some people seem to be really stalking him and resorting to contacting people he works with - SAYS THE MAN WHO CLAIMS HE DOESN'T KNOW HIM. Geez, if I didn't know any better I would say you are Mike.
Ironic because he said the exact same thing to me, that is - " It doesn't seem if he provided any of his evidence that people here would believe him."
only God knows wrote:
always seemed unfair that people expect someone who completed a race over a year ago is supposed to now prove they did it. I think the marathon should have to prove they did not. Also seems there should be a reasonable time after which things stand. I have no idea if anyone did or did not run a certain distance in a certain time but just seems unfair if the guy is in the video and at the finish and his bib registered at the beginning and end then how can you DQ him? Because you say he wasn't capable of that? No way you can know that, 3:11 is not that fast and someone could do that. Some people crank that out easy their first time. Because he is not in photos? troubling and maybe suspicious but come on, a year later and that is the determinant? Where in the rules does it say you must be photographed on the course or be subject to a DQ? even if the guy was photographed on the course most of you would still deny he did it just because that is what you want to believe
this thread is really a mean-spirited joke with a lot of obsessive and weird behavior
He didn't do it.
I'm with you greenfan wrote:
I'm with you greenfan and this is the sort of lengths they go to,
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1s0f2sI8FvoD4nFriEngQQXhwBqYbVLq0V5VjI2ARRp4/edit?pli=1#gid=0they're either trolls or obsessed, I think both. And you're right "no evidence proving his guilt has been offered" and this was established not just by the RD but also USATF, that's the USA Track & Field national governing body. But still the idiots on here won't accept it and keep telling everyone new evidence is forthcoming from these investigative groups which is never going to happen.
]
Awesome reminder that Rossi is a POS - thanks for this. The misquote is excellent work, truly well done! We all know that neither the RD or USATF made this statement - so writing a lie to show Mike is innocence is great stuff and an example of what a POS he is - as only a POS would resort the truth like this - a cheating POS, to be exact.
Keep up the good work!
perfect, thank you wrote:
I'm with you greenfan wrote:I'm with you greenfan and this is the sort of lengths they go to,
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1s0f2sI8FvoD4nFriEngQQXhwBqYbVLq0V5VjI2ARRp4/edit?pli=1#gid=0they're either trolls or obsessed, I think both. And you're right "no evidence proving his guilt has been offered" and this was established not just by the RD but also USATF, that's the USA Track & Field national governing body. But still the idiots on here won't accept it and keep telling everyone new evidence is forthcoming from these investigative groups which is never going to happen.
]
Awesome reminder that Rossi is a POS - thanks for this. The misquote is excellent work, truly well done! We all know that neither the RD or USATF made this statement - so writing a lie to show Mike is innocence is great stuff and an example of what a POS he is - as only a POS would resort the truth like this - a cheating POS, to be exact.
Keep up the good work!
+1
*distort the truth*
only God knows wrote:
I think the marathon should have to prove they did not.
You are right, it's called innocent til proven guilty and it's up to the prosecution to prove the guilt, they couldn't, or anyone on here, which is why MR is innocent.
I stand corrected, not EVERYONE on this message board is paranoid and part of a mob. At least some can think reasonably, knee jerk reactions and passionate defamation attempts means you don't have a leg to stand on. By no means am I saying I support Mike but I do feel he is being wrongly subjected to internet bullying.
I'm with you greenfan wrote:
I'm with you greenfan and this is the sort of lengths they go to,
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1s0f2sI8FvoD4nFriEngQQXhwBqYbVLq0V5VjI2ARRp4/edit?pli=1#gid=0they're either trolls or obsessed, I think both. And you're right "no evidence proving his guilt has been offered" and this was established not just by the RD but also USATF, that's the USA Track & Field national governing body. But still the idiots on here won't accept it and keep telling everyone new evidence is forthcoming from these investigative groups which is never going to happen.
greenfan wrote:Suffering from paranoia? That's what I mean about posters here, no one is credible and no evidence proving his guilt has been offered. The facts stand that he received his BQ time and there were absolutely no grounds to DQ him. Surely someone would have seen him step off the course in a major marathon like that. Weren't hundreds of people asked if they saw anything unusual? They did a thorough investigation and the facts remain. Whoever is trying to defame him here should get out there and work just as hard and see that improving a lot can happen with smart training.
perfect, thank you wrote:
I'm with you greenfan wrote:I'm with you greenfan and this is the sort of lengths they go to,
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1s0f2sI8FvoD4nFriEngQQXhwBqYbVLq0V5VjI2ARRp4/edit?pli=1#gid=0they're either trolls or obsessed, I think both. And you're right "no evidence proving his guilt has been offered" and this was established not just by the RD but also USATF, that's the USA Track & Field national governing body. But still the idiots on here won't accept it and keep telling everyone new evidence is forthcoming from these investigative groups which is never going to happen.
]
Awesome reminder that Rossi is a POS - thanks for this. The misquote is excellent work, truly well done! We all know that neither the RD or USATF made this statement - so writing a lie to show Mike is innocence is great stuff and an example of what a POS he is - as only a POS would resort the truth like this - a cheating POS, to be exact.
Keep up the good work!
OK, so you're one of the obsessed trolls, so obsessed you're not taking the time to read, comprehend and absorb, go back and look, you'll discover I was quoting greenfan, so no misquote. The word idiot seems to get used a lot here, now I know why.
I'm with you greenfan wrote:
perfect, thank you wrote:Awesome reminder that Rossi is a POS - thanks for this. The misquote is excellent work, truly well done! We all know that neither the RD or USATF made this statement - so writing a lie to show Mike is innocence is great stuff and an example of what a POS he is - as only a POS would resort the truth like this - a cheating POS, to be exact.
Keep up the good work!
OK, so you're one of the obsessed trolls, so obsessed you're not taking the time to read, comprehend and absorb, go back and look, you'll discover I was quoting greenfan, so no misquote. The word idiot seems to get used a lot here, now I know why.
i never said that.
God answers wrote:
only God knows wrote:always seemed unfair that people expect someone who completed a race over a year ago is supposed to now prove they did it. I think the marathon should have to prove they did not. Also seems there should be a reasonable time after which things stand. I have no idea if anyone did or did not run a certain distance in a certain time but just seems unfair if the guy is in the video and at the finish and his bib registered at the beginning and end then how can you DQ him? Because you say he wasn't capable of that? No way you can know that, 3:11 is not that fast and someone could do that. Some people crank that out easy their first time. Because he is not in photos? troubling and maybe suspicious but come on, a year later and that is the determinant? Where in the rules does it say you must be photographed on the course or be subject to a DQ? even if the guy was photographed on the course most of you would still deny he did it just because that is what you want to believe
this thread is really a mean-spirited joke with a lot of obsessive and weird behavior
He didn't do it.
so we can't prove course-cutting, but the thread now proves God exists because God commented!!
God,
When you say "He didn't do it" do you mean he did not run the race or he did not cut the course?
I am not going to elaborate. Really sometimes you mortals irritate me, I answer you and you just want more and more and more. I thought when I created woman for you it would keep you busy and shut you up.
Yes I did
greenfan wrote:
i never said that.
greenfan wrote:
Yes I did
greenfan wrote:i never said that.
Register your name, it's really not that hard.
greenfan wrote:
Yes I did
greenfan wrote:i never said that.
sorry about that - i was confusing myself posting as greenfan, greefan, i agree with green fan, et al., and I forgot what I said under other names. my bad.
I'm with you greenfan wrote:
OK, so you're one of the obsessed trolls, so obsessed you're not taking the time to read, comprehend and absorb, go back and look, you'll discover I was quoting greenfan, so no misquote. The word idiot seems to get used a lot here, now I know why.
Excellent!! Mike is a POS - thanks for your input! We all know only an idiot would believe Mike ran a 3:11 marathon and was found innocent. if you could "comprehend and absorb" the overwhelming evidence, you wouldn't be here saying this crap - unless it was to prove Mike is a POS, of course.
Example - remember how Lance Armstong was never found guilty of cheating for years and years and years - did that mean he never cheated? Was he proven innocent by not failing a drug test? Well, of course not, you're just trying to prove Mike is a POS by saying this offensive ridiculous crap. Nice work. Keep it up.
greefan wrote:
I stand corrected, not EVERYONE on this message board is paranoid and part of a mob. At least some can think reasonably, knee jerk reactions and passionate defamation attempts means you don't have a leg to stand on. By no means am I saying I support Mike but I do feel he is being wrongly subjected to internet bullying.
For something to be defamatory, it has to be untrue. So, the only people potentially defaming Mike Rossi are those claiming he actually ran a 3:11 marathon. The overwhelming evidence shows that is just not possible and it did not happen.
So, in this I agree with you, passionate defamation attempts to claim Mike Rossi ran a 3:11 marathon do not have a leg to stand on.
Pointing out that someone cheated, when they cheated, is not bullying. And, given that Mike and his friends have been putting in a lot of posts, keeping this thread going, one can only conclude they want this to keep going - so, also not bullying, He likes it. If they stopped, this thread dwindles to nothing rapidly.
Dear Lord, if it's Mike coming on here and posting under varied names to try to defend Rossi or sway public opinion, then he is far more pathetic than I ever imagined possible.
If it's just a troll then I thank him for fueling the thread.
Either way, Mike just keeps on losing. It has to be sinking in that whether there is a DQ or not, being a cheater is his legacy.
defamatory wrote:
greefan wrote:I stand corrected, not EVERYONE on this message board is paranoid and part of a mob. At least some can think reasonably, knee jerk reactions and passionate defamation attempts means you don't have a leg to stand on. By no means am I saying I support Mike but I do feel he is being wrongly subjected to internet bullying.
For something to be defamatory, it has to be untrue. So, the only people potentially defaming Mike Rossi are those claiming he actually ran a 3:11 marathon. The overwhelming evidence shows that is just not possible and it did not happen.
So, in this I agree with you, passionate defamation attempts to claim Mike Rossi ran a 3:11 marathon do not have a leg to stand on.
Pointing out that someone cheated, when they cheated, is not bullying. And, given that Mike and his friends have been putting in a lot of posts, keeping this thread going, one can only conclude they want this to keep going - so, also not bullying, He likes it. If they stopped, this thread dwindles to nothing rapidly.
Yes, and Mike and his "attorney" should be contacting everyone soon to defend his honor. He cannot let these false statements stand unanswered.