Did Mike Rossi (viral marathon dad) cheat his way into Boston?

abingtonrunner wrote:

wrong approach wrote:

I have to agree with the above person. How many ways you can NOT find Mike Rossi is not considered proof. Eye witnesses to nothing is nothing as far as Barb is concerned. You need to concentrate of how he pulled it off and proof of how it did it. Anything else is just stupid and you are all wasting your time.

Actually until you hear it from the LVM Committee themselves, you can't assume what they consider conclusive evidence to be. All you are doing is being a shill for Mike Rossi.

Any reasonable person realizes that there is enough conclusive evidence already, along with plenty of supporting and circumstantial evidence to DQ him. For whatever reason, this race has chosen not to.

and what are you doing except piling on to the amount of evidence they won't accept? There was a video of the bridge with no Rossi. Then there was video with 5 photos spots and no Rossi. If there was a photo of Bigfoot at the finish line it could still be argued there is no Bigfoot, it was just Rossi in a gorilla costume.

If Rossi was with you now he'd be slapping you over the your head with your own arm yelling, why do you keep hitting yourself?

Yep!

They should delete the thread or not delete it. Not leave it in limbo with NT in the index.

not awesome, not awesome at all.

mike's the winner boring wrote:

But hey, keep going.

Thanks, but no thanks, I'm done, I've won, life's too good and too short, over and out.

P.S. Good luck with the new evidence, I might call back at page 500.

SarahB killed the thread.

sdfghjkl wrote:

SarahB killed the thread.

Hardly. SarahB did not kill the thread.

Which happens first?

I'm 43 and I just ran a tempo run with a 3:26 9th kilometer. I ran it on Rossi-animosity, or Rossimosity as I am now calling it. It's kinda like running on hate, but its really a mix of disgust and contempt.

abingtonruner wrote:

sdfghjkl wrote:

SarahB killed the thread.

Hardly. SarahB did not kill the thread.

sure she did. she disappeared for a month and then stormed back on and brow beat anybody talking about anything but the same stupid sh!t that we have known since the beginning. a son as somebody suggested Bard had been bribed she has to tell them to knock it off. she is a kill-joy. and now claims they have evidence but won't release it. when she comes back with something she should be welcomed back. but her nazi like attempt to stop open conversation is ludicrous.

i say we should look into the possibility that barb was bribed by rossi to keep her mouth shut. or lets see the books for charitable donations to make sure rossi didn't write via a big fat check tools the other way.

hbcsljhdbclsid wrote:

abingtonruner wrote:

Hardly. SarahB did not kill the thread.

sure she did. she disappeared for a month and then stormed back on and brow beat anybody talking about anything but the same stupid sh!t that we have known since the beginning. a son as somebody suggested Bard had been bribed she has to tell them to knock it off. she is a kill-joy. and now claims they have evidence but won't release it. when she comes back with something she should be welcomed back. but her nazi like attempt to stop open conversation is ludicrous.

i say we should look into the possibility that barb was bribed by rossi to keep her mouth shut. or lets see the books for charitable donations to make sure rossi didn't write via a big fat check tools the other way.

What's the frequency, Kenneth?

hbcsljhdbclsid wrote:

abingtonruner wrote:

Hardly. SarahB did not kill the thread.

sure she did. she disappeared for a month and then stormed back on and brow beat anybody talking about anything but the same stupid sh!t that we have known since the beginning. a son as somebody suggested Bard had been bribed she has to tell them to knock it off. she is a kill-joy. and now claims they have evidence but won't release it. when she comes back with something she should be welcomed back. but her nazi like attempt to stop open conversation is ludicrous.

i say we should look into the possibility that barb was bribed by rossi to keep her mouth shut. or lets see the books for charitable donations to make sure rossi didn't write via a big fat check tools the other way.

HI KEN!

hbcsljhdbclsid wrote:

abingtonruner wrote:

Hardly. SarahB did not kill the thread.

sure she did. she disappeared for a month and then stormed back on and brow beat anybody talking about anything but the same stupid sh!t that we have known since the beginning. a son as somebody suggested Bard had been bribed she has to tell them to knock it off. she is a kill-joy. and now claims they have evidence but won't release it. when she comes back with something she should be welcomed back. but her nazi like attempt to stop open conversation is ludicrous.

i say we should look into the possibility that barb was bribed by rossi to keep her mouth shut. or lets see the books for charitable donations to make sure rossi didn't write via a big fat check tools the other way.

All Sara tried to do was talk some sense into you since you've clearly gone off the deep end here.

Seeing Ken post under other random names is hilarious! He makes it so easy to figure out because he can't hide the fact that he's a conspiracy theorist nutjob flinging poo at whomever is next on his radar. Today it's SarahB, tomorrow who knows...

GregTR wrote:

Seeing Ken post under other random names is hilarious! He makes it so easy to figure out because he can't hide the fact that he's a conspiracy theorist nutjob flinging poo at whomever is next on his radar. Today it's SarahB, tomorrow who knows...

Who's actually worse Mike Rossi who cheated at a marathon to BQ and is an attention hound or Ken Stillman who defrauded over 80 couples of a timely wedding video and only came through after the AG stepped in?

how do you even plan on getting new evidence to the RD. she won't take the phone call from a lynch mob.

ljhdsblchsdbcl wrote:

how do you even plan on getting new evidence to the RD. she won't take the phone call from a lynch mob.

Agreed

I'd say you posters for having no self respect posting about those two to this thread 24/7

Lesser of 2 evils wrote:

GregTR wrote:

Seeing Ken post under other random names is hilarious! He makes it so easy to figure out because he can't hide the fact that he's a conspiracy theorist nutjob flinging poo at whomever is next on his radar. Today it's SarahB, tomorrow who knows...

Who's actually worse Mike Rossi who cheated at a marathon to BQ and is an attention hound or Ken Stillman who defrauded over 80 couples of a timely wedding video and only came through after the AG stepped in?

Lesser of 2 evils wrote:

GregTR wrote:

Seeing Ken post under other random names is hilarious! He makes it so easy to figure out because he can't hide the fact that he's a conspiracy theorist nutjob flinging poo at whomever is next on his radar. Today it's SarahB, tomorrow who knows...

Who's actually worse Mike Rossi who cheated at a marathon to BQ and is an attention hound or Ken Stillman who defrauded over 80 couples of a timely wedding video and only came through after the AG stepped in?

You're both sloppy bitches.

They've hidden this thread just like they used to hide the lunatic asylums from the public in the old days and just like those asylums this thread is full of nutters, lunatics, losers and sad misfits, no wonder MR considers himself a winner.