Houlihan on FNC

TFFan wrote:

What's most damning is that the interviewers asked if they tested the burrito (meat) and the lawyer immediately directed the convo to the urine sample. This is it, folks...they tested the meat. Story didn't add up.

They tested the meat a month later... It isn't the same batch of meat, thus the claim it was contaminated. Your reasoning is good, but your dots don't connect.

Not a pork/carne asada expert, but wouldn't the source be the same? Not the exact same, but similar?

If there was steroid-contaminated meat, it's more likely it was a bad batch not a consistent supply issue.

Testing meat a month or so later was more a due diligence thing - low odds of actually finding steroid contamination. It does exclude possibility of tainted meat previously.

It'd be like a pedestrian being hit in crosswalk and suing for damages. If Defence has someone return to the scene and safely walk across the street 100 times, does it prove no one was hit?

^ ... it does not exclude...

The attorney admitted it when he talked about the only 2 ways it could be in her system. ‘We know she didn’t take it this way.’ He realized what he said and stammered for a second after that.

Man, she's sooper dooper guilty.

They're just digging a deeper hole for themselves at this point.

I personally love it. I'm so sick of dopers and anyone that believes in clean sport should love seeing her squirm.

pepa pigg wrote:

Man, she's sooper dooper guilty.

They're just digging a deeper hole for themselves at this point.

I personally love it. I'm so sick of dopers and anyone that believes in clean sport should love seeing her squirm.

This whole charade with attempting to still run OT before they had to be smacked down by World Athletic's has burned me on Shelby even beyond her doping. She could have taken her ban and faded away. Instead it just reinforces that she's a cheat, skirts the rules, and oesn't care about the integrity of the sport or her fellow athletes. What a psychopath.

Has anyone found this food truck yet????

Ernest wrote:

If there was steroid-contaminated meat, it's more likely it was a bad batch not a consistent supply issue.

Testing meat a month or so later was more a due diligence thing - low odds of actually finding steroid contamination. It does exclude possibility of tainted meat previously.

It'd be like a pedestrian being hit in crosswalk and suing for damages. If Defence has someone return to the scene and safely walk across the street 100 times, does it prove no one was hit?

+1

wada test wrote:

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.wada-ama.org/sites/default/files/td2019na_final_eng_clean.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwjil-yNsZzxAhUDCs0KHVVXAcEQFjALegQIFhAC&usg=AOvVaw1pUWpXHtJyZBtRes7e_3GK

According to the testing document you can have less than 15 and be cleared. Maybe trace isn't accurate but it is tested differently.

I read that differently - This document is saying there is a standard positive drug that calibrates the test at a concentration of 15 ng/dL. and that any positive sample tested between 2.5-15 ng/dL will get a second analysis with GCMS (gas chromatography mass spectrometry) which is a machine that would confirm the positive sample is nandrolone. So basically the document is documenting the procedures that if you have 2.5-15 ng/dL you get a confirmatory more expensive time consuming screen which confirms the drug, which SH would have had to have failed (they found nandrolone). The document does NOT in my reading of it redefine "trace," or place samples less than 15 ng/dL in the questionable range, it's just basically saying if you POP for > 15 ng/dL we don't have to do GCMS - you're positive for that drug tested for.

+1

They have gone to every freaking burrito truck in Oregon and could not find a single sample that would make you pop for nandrolone. If they had found even 1 burrito, they would be shouting it from the rooftops. But they didn’t. She got the one nandrolone-laced burrito in all of Oregon, supposedly. A terrible coincidence, to be sure.

Okay, but they had 5 months. And they hired a private investigator. And in 5 months they could not find a single burrito anywhere with nandrolone in it? So we are left to believe that she coincidentally ate a burrito from the one bad batch of pork-testicle burrito that this food truck has sold in the last 5 months? Come on. This is ridiculous at this point.

byron evans wrote:

LRC note: here is the video clip

https://video.foxnews.com/v/6259149999001#sp=show-clips

LMAO they do not buy the story at all.

Oooohhhh innocent people go on Fox News to defend their wrongdoing all the time. Now we know she is bigly cleared of all charges. I can see why USATF was gonna let her run & not let non-white athletes do the same thing when they faced similar charges.