We should let the illegals stay and count their numbers against yearly immigration quotas. I think they should be given resident status with no chance at citizenship for 30 years.
We should let the illegals stay and count their numbers against yearly immigration quotas. I think they should be given resident status with no chance at citizenship for 30 years.
Mexico is a wonderful place.
They should just go back as Adults.
Go back to Mexico
Come back to Mexico, we miss you.
https://media-cdn.tripadvisor.com/media/photo-s/07/5e/0c/43/hotel-brisa-tower.jpg
Precious Roy wrote:
The real problem is that INS limits legal immigration from Mexico to @26,000 a year and there are about 1.3 million people on a waiting list for a green card. That means the typical wait time to get a green card is about a decade and can be as long as 25 years. INS will also not allow more than 7% of legal immigration to come from any one country each year.
INS? Are you still living in the 20th century???
USCIS wrote:
Precious Roy wrote:
The real problem is that INS limits legal immigration from Mexico to @26,000 a year and there are about 1.3 million people on a waiting list for a green card. That means the typical wait time to get a green card is about a decade and can be as long as 25 years. INS will also not allow more than 7% of legal immigration to come from any one country each year.
INS? Are you still living in the 20th century???
It was a simpler time.
I think we should send all the germans, english, irish, italians, russians, and polish back. They were too crappy to stick it out in their impoverished countries in the 1700 and 1800s. Bunch of low lifes.
The elitists in this country are okay with illegal immigration only because they aren't impacted by it themselves. Its just an abstract concept to them (most of you). The reality is that if immigrants take my job, I literally can't put food on my family. But compassion for "dreamers" doesn't extent to regular Americans.
so dumb wrote:
DiscoGary wrote:
You are unaware of your racism, and you have no idea how much damage it does to society.
You tired, unclever "reverse-racism" ploy is so see-through, it's a joke. It's all you've got. You use it everywhere, like a broken, racist record.
You think racism has a direction? Oh, wait, you simply are willing to overlook racism if it is whites who are its direct victims.
the real story wrote:
I literally can't put food on my family. .
Enough of you millennials and your wasteful food fights. There's starving kid in Africa who would love that food.
Jose el Plomero wrote:
I'll take the hardworking Mexicans, btw. At least they contribute.
No. Illegal Mexican immigrants don't contribute. That's one of the main reasons to not give them amnesty.
Voi wrote:
Jose el Plomero wrote:
I'll take the hardworking Mexicans, btw. At least they contribute.
No. Illegal Mexican immigrants don't contribute. That's one of the main reasons to not give them amnesty.
If they work, they are stealing your job. If they don't work, they are free riders. That's why they don't contribute either way.
so dumb wrote:
DiscoGary wrote:
You are unaware of your racism, and you have no idea how much damage it does to society.
You tired, unclever "reverse-racism" ploy is so see-through, it's a joke. It's all you've got. You use it everywhere, like a broken, racist record.
Here in Manhattan, that fastness of leftism, I frequently spot on the advertising placards within its subways announcements from the MTA (Metropolitan Transit Association) saying that if I am a woman or a minority and own a small business, it is here to help me. In other words: men and non-minorities will not be helped. It is flagrant sexism and racism, and I think it hurts everyone. There are a multitude of other examples. This perpetuates divisions within society. As the earlier post indicates, women, by several measures (longevity, education, incarceration) are outperforming men: why, even if this could be justified, do they need further advantage? And helping minorities who often are quite capable of helping themselves shifts the spotlight away from the causes of their underperformance such as astronomical out-of-wedlock birth rates, bad schools, underemployment, etc.
Other examples include requiring Asians to outscore other minorities by wide margins on admissions exams. Is that also part of your perceived "'reverse-racism' ploy?" I know some east Asian families who dislike Mayor Bill de Blasio's efforts to shift the admissions policy at the city's top public high schools (e.g., Bronx Science, Stuyvesant, Brooklyn Tech) away from the long-standing admission test. East Asian kids are kicking everybody's butt, even white kids. Mayor de Blasio wants to consider diversity criteria. I say it would be better to improve the schools, mores and attitudes the lead to underperformance. East Asian kids tend to come from a family with a mother and father married to each other whereas black kids usually do not. Think of just the effect that has on verbal skills developed from hearing adult conversations. And many east Asian kids go for tutoring or additional formal education on Saturdays. Too bad they and white kids are not "diverse" enough for de Blasio, who is white and, by the way, didn't step away from his first mayoral campaign to let John Thompson, who is black and was the runner-up in the Democrat primary, become the Democrat nominee for mayor. Sacrifices on the altar of "Affirmative Action" are for white people and males other than elites like de Blasio.
You are good at name calling and taunting ("[I]t's a joke. It's all you've got.") but quite poor at substantiating your denial.
NYC guy wrote:
so dumb wrote:
You tired, unclever "reverse-racism" ploy is so see-through, it's a joke. It's all you've got. You use it everywhere, like a broken, racist record.
Here in Manhattan, that fastness of leftism, I frequently spot on the advertising placards within its subways announcements from the MTA (Metropolitan Transit Association) saying that if I am a woman or a minority and own a small business, it is here to help me. In other words: men and non-minorities will not be helped. It is flagrant sexism and racism, and I think it hurts everyone. There are a multitude of other examples. This perpetuates divisions within society. As the earlier post indicates, women, by several measures (longevity, education, incarceration) are outperforming men: why, even if this could be justified, do they need further advantage? And helping minorities who often are quite capable of helping themselves shifts the spotlight away from the causes of their underperformance such as astronomical out-of-wedlock birth rates, bad schools, underemployment, etc.
Other examples include requiring Asians to outscore other minorities by wide margins on admissions exams. Is that also part of your perceived "'reverse-racism' ploy?" I know some east Asian families who dislike Mayor Bill de Blasio's efforts to shift the admissions policy at the city's top public high schools (e.g., Bronx Science, Stuyvesant, Brooklyn Tech) away from the long-standing admission test. East Asian kids are kicking everybody's butt, even white kids. Mayor de Blasio wants to consider diversity criteria. I say it would be better to improve the schools, mores and attitudes the lead to underperformance. East Asian kids tend to come from a family with a mother and father married to each other whereas black kids usually do not. Think of just the effect that has on verbal skills developed from hearing adult conversations. And many east Asian kids go for tutoring or additional formal education on Saturdays. Too bad they and white kids are not "diverse" enough for de Blasio, who is white and, by the way, didn't step away from his first mayoral campaign to let John Thompson, who is black and was the runner-up in the Democrat primary, become the Democrat nominee for mayor. Sacrifices on the altar of "Affirmative Action" are for white people and males other than elites like de Blasio.
You are good at name calling and taunting ("[I]t's a joke. It's all you've got.") but quite poor at substantiating your denial.
If you are east Asian, the Democrats are responsible for requiring you to outscore other groups for admission to a top school, but they are also responsible for preferring to hire you at the post office. Maybe that's also "reverse-racism" and doesn't count in the "that's all you got" guy's mind as the jobs boost makes up for the school oppression :P
12345 wrote:
If you are east Asian, the Democrats are responsible for requiring you to outscore other groups for admission to a top school, but they are also responsible for preferring to hire you at the post office. Maybe that's also "reverse-racism" and doesn't count in the "that's all you got" guy's mind as the jobs boost makes up for the school oppression :P
Democrats are feathering their own nest via the "Affirmative-Action"-illegal immigration nexxus :
In U.S. presidential elections, persons of color whose roots are in Asia, Africa and Latin America vote 4-1 Democratic, and against the candidates favored by American’s vanishing white majority. Not for the first time, liberal ideology comports precisely with liberal interests.
DiscoGary wrote:
We have a big problem with anti-white racism in this country.
The US is a country with a high level of racism but not in the way you are describing here. That is infowars level of stupid.
It's ok to admit racism is a problem here, that doesn't make you a bad person or a bad citizen.
Perhaps it is too hard for you to see it, but I can assure you that it is there. It's everywhere.
L L wrote:
Precious Roy wrote:
INS will also not allow more than 7% of legal immigration to come from any one country each year.
Imagine if that was in effect in 1789.
Hmmmm about 3.9 million people in the US in 1790. We could definitely use more then.
But unfettered immigration now would be insane.
somebloke wrote:
DiscoGary wrote:
We have a big problem with anti-white racism in this country.
The US is a country with a high level of racism but not in the way you are describing here. That is infowars level of stupid.
It's ok to admit racism is a problem here, that doesn't make you a bad person or a bad citizen.
Perhaps it is too hard for you to see it, but I can assure you that it is there. It's everywhere.
Ummm, what part of women and minorities are encouraged to apply fails to signal discrimination against males and non-minorities to you. DiscoGary is correct.
