I think is worth pointing out that at every opportunity the authorities fought to deny evidence.
At first there was a constant refusal by UKS , UkA and KCL to accept that any of them was the data controller. To get it accepted that KCL were the data controller took a year and the intervention of the Data Commisioner.
There was then a fight , again having to refer to the Commissioner, as to what was the possible data held.
It is sensible to pause for little to remind that all this was to get the calibration run for the tests in question and that it had been stated that such existed and even to Parliament.
We then have the H and S excuse and an other year or so.That stupidly was overcome.
Then they refused to provide as they said that they did not have a suitable photocopier . YES ! they really said this.
Eventually Edwards team arrived with there own “ normal “ photocopier . 600 pages of hidden data appeared including the extra 57 tests with not enough urine .
But still no calibration data . They said it existed but refused to provide claiming it was not personal data.
So the whole process started again via the Freedom of Infomation Act . An other few years go by and more evasion. Eventually the FOI court ordered the release of the Calibration Data .
Under this pressure KCL admitted they had never ever had the calibration curves for the analysis.
All this is commensurate with there being contamination in the water blank and the wrong molecule was being measured .
This was a key finding of the Davis report .