Women runs 520 miles on treadmill in 7 days but doesn't get WR as Guinness says her witness doesn't count

I'm training for a half marathon on a treadmill with SportMe running appwhich calculates distance, time, pace and calories. I can't run out doors as summer runs in Colorado is hit or miss, so I prefer the treadmill.

British imperialist wrote:

This, and subsequent reference to TMS, confirms your credentials as a Brit.

A farmer's mile is slightly longer than a country mile and ultra runners can't match a Norfolk farmer's pace for the distance.

A bit obscure for me but nobody was able to answer my question about 8-43 which as anyone should know was Bob Willis's bowling analysis in the Australian second innings at Headingley in 1981. Maybe you are all Yanks.

Prince Gary wrote:

ExpertKipWatcher wrote:

"My mother could have played that with a stick of rhubarb"

"Corridor of uncertainty"

"Fred would have given him a right mouthful"

Do I need to carry on ?

Some people fake running. Some people fake nationality.

The lad doth protest too much, methinks.

+1

Yanks have this fascination with their homeland. Want to come back to mother England, I guess. Sorry but you Yanks have gotten too portly. There's not enough room now.

They could go to Scotland

Plusser of Ones wrote:

+1

Yanks have this fascination with their homeland. Want to come back to mother England, I guess. Sorry but you Yanks have gotten too portly. There's not enough room now.

Dim diolch.

Ultraboy wrote:

They could go to Scotland

Yea, well, the Scots have Scotch. What do the English have besides bad teeth?

Flounder wrote:

Ultraboy wrote:

They could go to Scotland

Yea, well, the Scots have Scotch. What do the English have besides bad teeth?

Whereas the USA has obesity, diabetes and redneck inbreeding to offer...

Flounder wrote:

Yea, well, the Scots have Scotch. What do the English have besides bad teeth?

Rob Young

Mark Vaz

Dave Reading

Amy Hughes

just to name a few

UKTeeth wrote:

Flounder wrote:

Yea, well, the Scots have Scotch. What do the English have besides bad teeth?

Whereas the USA has obesity, diabetes and redneck inbreeding to offer...

Brits are experts on inbreeding. And you didn't answer the about what the British have that's worthwhile.

What ho? Y'all are a lot of bollocksy wonkers! Go 8-43 yourselves!

Brits are experts on inbreeding and you didn't answer the question about what the British have that's worthwhile.

http://www.medicalbag.com/grey-matter/part-ii-british-royals-house-of-kissing-cousins/article/472430/

We allowed you to have your own country and 241 years later you voted for Ronald McDonald Trump as your President.

Trump wrote:

We allowed you to have your own country and 241 years later you voted for Ronald McDonald Trump as your President.

The last year hasn't been a very good year for us, nor has it been a very good one for you (Brexit).

agreed wrote:

Trump wrote:

We allowed you to have your own country and 241 years later you voted for Ronald McDonald Trump as your President.

The last year hasn't been a very good year for us, nor has it been a very good one for you (Brexit).

True, we felt sorry that you'd become the laughing stock of the world so thought we'd help out and take some of the spotlight off our 'merican cousins.

TrueDay wrote:

you'd become the laughing stock of the world

As much as it hurts, I agree.

Currently a debate on this on Facebook Group- Ultrarunning Community.

The boyfriend has just posted a lengthy rant but with nothing to back up their claims.

Yeah seen that...t'was was a proper rant, I could see the frothing mouth from here!

No amount of playing victim, ranting or creating cringeworthy hashtags will change the fact that she didn't meet the requirements as set out my GWR.

If she wants support from the running community she simply needs to do is publish the data. If the data backs up her claims I'm sure she'd gain a lot of support from fellow runners. Until then she'll always be viewed as a runner of dubious pedigree and claims.

SeenThat wrote:

If she wants support from the running community she simply needs to do is publish the data. If the data backs up her claims I'm sure she'd gain a lot of support from fellow runners. Until then she'll always be viewed as a runner of dubious pedigree and claims.

If the data looks good, then I'll gladly retract my claim that his doesn't pass the sniff test.

Could you post the rant please.