NPR shows its complete stupidity yet again

They're trying their best to get Trump reelected in 2020.

Lol that's gold, Jerry. GOLD!

Meh. I don't really see the big deal you're trying to make.

Janky wrote:

Meh. I don't really see the big deal you're trying to make.

The Williams sisters together were beat by a guy who was ranked 203, so I don't really know why the other guy finds the idea that Serena alone could be beat by a whole lot of guys to be that outlandish.

based on evidence wrote:

Janky wrote:

Meh. I don't really see the big deal you're trying to make.

The Williams sisters together were beat by a guy who was ranked 203, so I don't really know why the other guy finds the idea that Serena alone could be beat by a whole lot of guys to be that outlandish.

What other guy found that idea outlandish?

NPR is a joke, it's so far left of obnoxious.

Why are they always whispering and why do I have to here transgender stories every 30 minutes?

That's his point: that anyone not blinded by ideas of absolute equality of genders would know immediately that a man's speed and muscle just cannot be matched by even the best female athlete. Just look at the post-CAS women's 800.

Gravy wrote:

They're trying their best to get Trump reelected in 2020.

+1

They don't even realize it. Their irrational leftist preaching is only pushing people away.

Janky wrote:

based on evidence wrote:

The Williams sisters together were beat by a guy who was ranked 203, so I don't really know why the other guy finds the idea that Serena alone could be beat by a whole lot of guys to be that outlandish.

What other guy found that idea outlandish?

The guy who isn't McEnroe.

based on evidence wrote:

Janky wrote:

What other guy found that idea outlandish?

The guy who isn't McEnroe.

So you didn't read it.

Janky wrote:

based on evidence wrote:

The guy who isn't McEnroe.

So you didn't read it.

I read the quoted portion, which makes it clear that this person believes Serena to be the best tennis player in the world of either gender despite existing evidence that she is not.

based on evidence wrote:

Janky wrote:

So you didn't read it.

I read the quoted portion, which makes it clear that this person believes Serena to be the best tennis player in the world of either gender despite existing evidence that she is not.

So that's a no. Lulu Garcia-Navarro is not a dude. It is pretty clear in the article that she doesn't think that Williams would beat the top men. More accurately, it appears like she was just getting caught up in semantics of "best player" when she meant "most dominant" or something thereabouts, a scenario where you aren't pitting men vs. women in actual matches. So while she poorly presented her argument, I go back to my original statement of "I don't really see the big deal you are trying to make" about NPR showing complete stupidity. It's a very "meh" interaction.

the regressive right can't be bothered to READ and THINK

Janky wrote:

based on evidence wrote:

I read the quoted portion, which makes it clear that this person believes Serena to be the best tennis player in the world of either gender despite existing evidence that she is not.

So that's a no. Lulu Garcia-Navarro is not a dude. It is pretty clear in the article that she doesn't think that Williams would beat the top men. More accurately, it appears like she was just getting caught up in semantics of "best player" when she meant "most dominant" or something thereabouts, a scenario where you aren't pitting men vs. women in actual matches. So while she poorly presented her argument, I go back to my original statement of "I don't really see the big deal you are trying to make" about NPR showing complete stupidity. It's a very "meh" interaction.

Does it say in the article that the person is not a dude? I've read it now, and don't see any mention of the person's sex or gender identity. I am only familiar with "Lulu" as an acronym for "locally unwanted land use," so I couldn't make any assumptions based on the name alone.

be quiet wrote:

the regressive right can't be bothered to READ and THINK

TRIGGERED!!!!

No, as is the case in most articles, it doesn't specifically call out the genders of all people mentioned. What's your point?

Janky wrote:

No, as is the case in most articles, it doesn't specifically call out the genders of all people mentioned. What's your point?

Wasn't your whole argument that I would have known that Lulu is not a dude if I had read the article?

based on evidence wrote:

Janky wrote:

No, as is the case in most articles, it doesn't specifically call out the genders of all people mentioned. What's your point?

Wasn't your whole argument that I would have known that Lulu is not a dude if I had read the article?

I made the argument that you weren't informed on the topic because you didn't read the article, yes, which was an accurate point. However, it wasn't based solely on your getting the gender wrong. Now that you've read it, do you still have the uninformed opinion that Garcia-Navarro thinks that Williams would beat the top men in a head-to-head competition? If not, would you point me to the complete stupidity displayed?

Janky wrote:

based on evidence wrote:

Wasn't your whole argument that I would have known that Lulu is not a dude if I had read the article?

I made the argument that you weren't informed on the topic because you didn't read the article, yes, which was an accurate point. However, it wasn't based solely on your getting the gender wrong. Now that you've read it, do you still have the uninformed opinion that Garcia-Navarro thinks that Williams would beat the top men in a head-to-head competition? If not, would you point me to the complete stupidity displayed?

I see that she backpedalled after getting called out for a false claim. It's really no cuter when Lulu does this than when Trump does it.