A wimpy, scaredy-cat, weakling cop shot and killed a 66-year-old woman who had a baseball bat as a weapon. The cop had a taser and decided he would rather kill. This certainly doesn't help the public perception of power hungry violent police.
A wimpy, scaredy-cat, weakling cop shot and killed a 66-year-old woman who had a baseball bat as a weapon. The cop had a taser and decided he would rather kill. This certainly doesn't help the public perception of power hungry violent police.
Guess she should have listened to a cop pointing a GUN at her.
Is that so hard?
Hi son wrote:
Guess she should have listened to a cop pointing a GUN at her.
Is that so hard?
Guess victims of gun toting thieves should listen to the thieves pointing a GUN at them.
Is that so hard?
Hi son wrote:
Guess she should have listened to a cop pointing a GUN at her.
Is that so hard?
Maybe you and Trump can start a death squad to wipe out the mentally ill.
Pointing Out the Obvious wrote:
Hi son wrote:Guess she should have listened to a cop pointing a GUN at her.
Is that so hard?
Guess victims of gun toting thieves should listen to the thieves pointing a GUN at them.
Is that so hard?
Your morality is inverted, my friend.
off base wrote:
Hi son wrote:Guess she should have listened to a cop pointing a GUN at her.
Is that so hard?
Maybe you and Trump can start a death squad to wipe out the mentally ill.
Wow. This is Trump's fault too?
Do what the police tell you to do or they are free to kill you.
Do not reach toward anything or the police are free to kill you.
Do not say or do anything that might make a police officer later say he/she was fearful of injury or they are free to kill you.
Don't be drunk, high on drugs, or mentally ill in the presence of the police or the police are free to kill you.
If you are ever in any of those situations and the police did not kill you, you should be thankful to the police for showing you mercy.
fgfadfkjh wrote:
Pointing Out the Obvious wrote:Guess victims of gun toting thieves should listen to the thieves pointing a GUN at them.
Is that so hard?
Your morality is inverted, my friend.
You know exactly zip about my morality, ignorant one.
Pointing Out the Obvious wrote:
You know exactly zip about my morality, ignorant one.
All I have to go on is your words. If you really think armed robbery is analogous to this situation, you have a screwed up sense of morality.
There are many arguments to use against the cop's actions, but yours may be the worst.
fgfadfkjh wrote:
Pointing Out the Obvious wrote:You know exactly zip about my morality, ignorant one.
All I have to go on is your words. If you really think armed robbery is analogous to this situation, you have a screwed up sense of morality.
There are many arguments to use against the cop's actions, but yours may be the worst.
The biggest difference is that the armed robber has a much higher probability of facing consequences for his actions.
fgfadfkjh wrote:
Pointing Out the Obvious wrote:You know exactly zip about my morality, ignorant one.
All I have to go on is your words. If you really think armed robbery is analogous to this situation, you have a screwed up sense of morality.
There are many arguments to use against the cop's actions, but yours may be the worst.
But alas, my argument was obviously NOT against the cop's actions. It was against the so-called logic of the poster to whom I was responding.
Thus it is easy to see that you have revealed a singular lack of logical thinking capacity.
What I now know about you is:
1) You are ignorant and like to advertise your own ignorance.
2) You are unable to see that which is obvious. That is, you are also stupid.
Not a good combination.
is there anything else that you would like to share?
Living in America wrote:
Do what the police tell you to do or they are free to kill you.
Do not reach toward anything or the police are free to kill you.
Do not say or do anything that might make a police officer later say he/she was fearful of injury or they are free to kill you.
Don't be drunk, high on drugs, or mentally ill in the presence of the police or the police are free to kill you.
If you are ever in any of those situations and the police did not kill you, you should be thankful to the police for showing you mercy.
F U and the pigs. You are a coward.
Gordon Lightfart wrote:
Living in America wrote:Do what the police tell you to do or they are free to kill you.
Do not reach toward anything or the police are free to kill you.
Do not say or do anything that might make a police officer later say he/she was fearful of injury or they are free to kill you.
Don't be drunk, high on drugs, or mentally ill in the presence of the police or the police are free to kill you.
If you are ever in any of those situations and the police did not kill you, you should be thankful to the police for showing you mercy.
F U and the pigs. You are a coward.
Are you honestly unaware of the intent of the post by 'Living in America'?
Even the article says "We failed." The "we" describing the cop who could not disarm a mentally disturbed 66 year old woman holding a bat. Didn't the jerkoff pig ever take a self defense course?
I hope this woman's family gets justice any way they can.......
Hi son wrote:
Guess she should have listened to a cop pointing a GUN at her.
Is that so hard?
She was mentally impaired, jerkoff. You were probably on the pigs side when they killed a deaf guy last month for "not listening" to pig commands.
Police officers go through rigorous hand to hand combat training in cadet academy. I know a couple of cops who were in the Army. They would take basic training any day over cadet academy. At the end of the cadet academy, most officers are in top shape and can easily defend themselves from an attack from an old woman with a bat without having to even deploy a taser. The problem is that police departments cannot enforce any ongoing physical fitness requirements because they always have a disparate impact on female officers. The result is that cops get out of shape very quickly after cadet academy and lose most of the hand to hand combat training within a short period of time. They then resort to lethal force more frequently than cops who maintain their training and fitness because they have lost the ability to defend themselves.
The disparate impact issue is easily overcome by requiring participation in ongoing fitness and hand to hand combat training without enforcing any fitness standards. But most major PDs are starved of funds and cannot afford to pay for the training.
Hi son wrote:
Guess she should have listened to a cop pointing a GUN at her.
Is that so hard?
"Do what the government says or the government will shoot you," say small government conservatives.
Pointing Out the Obvious wrote:
But alas, my argument was obviously NOT against the cop's actions. It was against the so-called logic of the poster to whom I was responding.
You're not very good at this.
Your response drew on an analogy that revealed an inverted morality. Do you disagree with this?
Let me spell it out more clearly for you in simple words so you can understand:
You likened an individual intending harm (woman with baseball bat) to an innocent party (robbery victim) and an innocent party (police officer) to an individual intending harm (armed robber). This is clearly inverted.
Linking the cop to the armed robber is a clear criticism of the cop's actions, whether you intended to criticize or not.
Let me know if you need clarification on the terms "innocent party" or "individual intending harm." Or the word "inverted." Or really anything I wrote.
Precious Roy wrote:
Police officers go through rigorous hand to hand combat training in cadet academy. I know a couple of cops who were in the Army. They would take basic training any day over cadet academy. At the end of the cadet academy, most officers are in top shape and can easily defend themselves from an attack from an old woman with a bat without having to even deploy a taser. The problem is that police departments cannot enforce any ongoing physical fitness requirements because they always have a disparate impact on female officers. The result is that cops get out of shape very quickly after cadet academy and lose most of the hand to hand combat training within a short period of time. They then resort to lethal force more frequently than cops who maintain their training and fitness because they have lost the ability to defend themselves.
The disparate impact issue is easily overcome by requiring participation in ongoing fitness and hand to hand combat training without enforcing any fitness standards. But most major PDs are starved of funds and cannot afford to pay for the training.
Nice speculation, any evidence for any of that?
Precious Roy wrote:
Police officers go through rigorous hand to hand combat training in cadet academy. I know a couple of cops who were in the Army. They would take basic training any day over cadet academy. At the end of the cadet academy, most officers are in top shape and can easily defend themselves from an attack from an old woman with a bat without having to even deploy a taser. The problem is that police departments cannot enforce any ongoing physical fitness requirements because they always have a disparate impact on female officers. The result is that cops get out of shape very quickly after cadet academy and lose most of the hand to hand combat training within a short period of time. They then resort to lethal force more frequently than cops who maintain their training and fitness because they have lost the ability to defend themselves.
The disparate impact issue is easily overcome by requiring participation in ongoing fitness and hand to hand combat training without enforcing any fitness standards. But most major PDs are starved of funds and cannot afford to pay for the training.
In most jobs, if a worker cannot keep up with the requirements of demands of the job, they are let go. So, if a cop can no longer physically meet the demands, he resorts to solving the problem by drawing a gun and shooting? The job of pig should be eliminated
I’m a D2 female runner. Our coach explicitly told us not to visit LetsRun forums.
Great interview with Steve Cram - says Jakob has no chance of WRs this year
Guys between age of 45 and 55 do you think about death or does it seem far away
2024 College Track & Field Open Coaching Positions Discussion
adizero Road to Records with Yomif Kejelcha, Agnes Ngetich, Hobbs Kessler & many more is Saturday
RENATO can you talk about the preparation of Emile Cairess 2:06