Person A and Person B both graduated with $50,000 of debt. Person A worked his tail off to pay off his entire debt in a couple years, while Person B has only been making the minimum payments, still has over $40,000 to pay off. How is it fair to Person A if Person B gets his payments wiped and Person A has to pay for Person B in future taxation (all student loans wiped means $1,000,000,000,000+ more on the national debt)?
Is this what liberals have in mind when they use the term "social justice"? I've always wondered what that means.