searching this forum brings up this thread:
https://www.letsrun.com/forum/flat_read.php?thread=905864
I think the idea of 1.16 proposed by someone is close to accurate.
boys girls
3:50 4:27
4:00 4:38
4:10 4:50
4:20 5:02
4:30 5:13
do others agree? I think it's off on the 430 time though HS girl running 513 is better than 430 for a guy.
Did you know 60 seconds is 60 seconds, no matter if you're a dude, chick, chick with balls or a attack helicopter?
Boys —> Girls
3:50 = 4:23
4:00 = 4:40
4:15 = 5:00
4:30 = 5:15
4:45 = 5:35
5:00 = 5:50
5:30 = 6:20
6:00 = 7:00
4:00 is more like 4:30 for girls. No way is it 4:40
4:00 is 97.1% of the record for a 17-year old male. 4:24 is 97.4% of the record for a 17-year old female.
4:30 is 86.3% of the record for a 17-year old male. 4:58 is 86.2% of the record for a 17-year old female.
See
You will find more 4:00 boys than you will find 4:30 girls. As a rule of thumb, I add 30 seconds onto a man’s elite time and 50 seconds onto a not-so-elite time. I’ve always been more impressed by girls who fun fast mostly because it doesn’t come as naturally. Males find any athletic activity much easier in general because evolution have promgrammed us that way. Over 90% of females don’t even have the body structure to break 6 in the mile whereas even dudes with stocky bodies could do that given enough training.
in the other thread, people were posting 4:30=5:00 which I think is ridiculous.
3 5:00 milers + 1 4:55 and you set a national record in the girls 4x1 mile.
3 4:30+ 1 4:25 gl even being an All-American team in the boys 4x1mile