Just my two cents.
Move NAIA Cross Nationals every year to a unique location that offers a different venue to race and experience every year. This type of rotating venue allows student-athletes, coaches, and family’s different experiences in different locations around North America. Wisconsin, Kansas, Iowa, California, Virginia, Kentucky, British Columbia, Etc. This type of rotating venue would not allow anyone to complain about routine courses or these courses playing into any one teams favor based on climate, region, course conditions, etc. With cross country the course will always favor teams that train in that region to some degree, but this rotating venue would allow for temporary region bias instead of regions hosting National meets year in and year out with no change. This type of venue could also apply to Indoor & Outdoor Track Championships. I think it would be harder to do indoors, but it could still be done. I got to compete in Abbottsford, BC, Olathe, Kansas, and Louisville, KY for my NAIA Outdoor Track Championships. I personally enjoyed moving sites for the most part and thought that I gained allot from the exposure to different regions and track sites. Yes, I enjoyed some allot more than others, but I thought it was great that running could take me to different places that I might not get to see in any other capacity. I agree with a previous poster that Cross Nationals should have hills, as well as snow, wind, sleet, mud, water holes, missing shoes, pushing, shoving, elbows, etc. However, some schools don't see cross-country in that dimension. Some schools race year round on golf courses, some schools on rolling grass fields, some schools on beaches and fast flat orange groves, some schools on muddy back roads, etc. What I am trying to say is that cross country is different for everyone based on their region, coach, program, level of training and competing, and many other factors...So why should nationals be any different. National meets should try to equally accommodate every program as much as possible. I think by offering a rotating venue it would accomplish that task as fairly and appropriately as possible. I think it would be great, and allot of work for a dedicated committee.
Again, just my two cents.