Exactly5 wrote:
OP
you are the problem. And, unfortunately, the future of this country. No longer are people serving their country, or volunteering for their communities. They are looking for ways to "get over"
While most people looked for part time jobs in high school, in the 50's- 1990's, the newer generation is being made into soft, lazy, jean wearing Pillsbury doughboys.
Your generation wears jeans to weddings, and are never seen before 6 AM anywhere.
I am afraid of what this country will become with the shrinking military, sledgehammers to the catholic churches, and gender-fluid people everywhere. Not to mention parents dressing their sons in dresses so they can "identify" their sex.
Go away. Get a job. Serve your country. volunteer. Or just go away
Everyone I know still looks for jobs. Volunteering might be declining...but that's difficult to tell if it's a result of mindset shifts...or just from people being swarmed with vastly larger amounts of debt and massive housing prices forcing them to work long hours to keep up.
The whole "ax religion thing I don't like. I certainly don't believe in god, but I think religion has a hell of a lot of value, and we are too quick to tear it up. Military might be a concern. Hard to tell.
Gender fluid is a really, really good thing. One of the three or four things conservatives struggle to see the most. Parents dressing their sons in dresses or vice versa is comically rare. Perhaps 1 in 10,000 to 1 in 100,000 arch liberal parents do stuff like that. I've never met or seen that happen in my entire life. If it was happening consistently, sure I would question it, but I don't worry about things that are stupidly rare.
Gender fluidity is huge because of the changes in dating and the resulting events of men. Since online dating went big in 2013 the number of men who want to be in a relationship but have never been has been jumping around 500k per year, and is over 20% now. That's a staggering figure with tremendous implications.
Biologically and culturally it's a huge deal to have a mate. The effect to a man's psyche and confident if he isn't able to find anyone is massive. It obviously makes you feel worthless and unwanted. Moreover, the reasons for this increase is very easily seen (incorrectly, but easily nonetheless) as being women's fault, which engenders anger as well. Anger at the system that got there, and at women. Angry young men are NOT a good thing. Even more so, angry young men without a significant other. Being in a relationship has massive benefits for preventing violence and other outcomes in young men.
The societal repercussions of this are truly unnerving. Which brings me back to gender fluidity and it's value. Homesexuality is great, because guys find a partner of some kind. M2F gender fluidity is even better, because it kills two birds with one stone; not only does that guy appear as female and find male partners, he provides an additional "female" partner to males.
That's a very good outcome, vastly superior to the alternative outcome of exponentially growing legions of angry young men disenfranchised with their ability to even find a partner as a consequence of today's altered dating landscape.