Can we now dive into the irregardless and regardless debate?
Can we now dive into the irregardless and regardless debate?
Bad Wigins wrote:
nadir wrote:
"Could care less" does not establish a minimum level of carrying—people (grammarians) imply that it does. "Could care are less" than what? "Couldn't care less" sets a bottom for the level of carrying. You cannot go any lower.
glass house dweller, lay down those rocks
they're not trying to establish a minimum. All they really mean is "less," i.e. their level of caring is low. There ain't no more to it than that.
And the original grammar troll shows himself. You really are on the wrong site if you care about this stuff. Personally, I have no fvcks to give on the subject.
I look forward to not caring about the care/careless debate but until the general population completely discontinues making it a point of conversation the best I can do is hope each time the care/careless debate pops up I'll manage to try to care a little less about it.
I will however vow from now on to say " I look forward to not caring about the care/careless debate but until the general population completely discontinues making it a point of conversation the best I can do is hope each time the care/careless debate pops up I'll manage to try to care a little less about it. "
Unfortunate Americans wrote:
It's one the shining examples of why the majority of the English speaking world think the Americans are limited on the brain cell count.
.
Do you run on pure jealousy?