klubkip1 wrote:
Girls only care about what is going to elevate them in society. Money and status.
Rigghhtttttttt
http://cheezburger.com/3017733/guy-conducts-twisted-experiment-on-tinder-as-fake-child-rapist-and-gets-horrifying-resultsklubkip1 wrote:
Girls only care about what is going to elevate them in society. Money and status.
Rigghhtttttttt
http://cheezburger.com/3017733/guy-conducts-twisted-experiment-on-tinder-as-fake-child-rapist-and-gets-horrifying-resultsLM wrote:
Pure cringe. You actually posted that?
First rule of attraction is you never listen to what people say. You see what they respond to. People generally have zero clue what turns them on. It's the classic "women want a nice guy, but nice guy sees no action" thing.
Not only do the links all lead to unsubstantiated fluff...basically a survey and some speculation by a professor...it's just obviously not true. All you have to do is go out with two relatively equal looking dudes facial but one who is shredded and one who isn't and just pay attention to how females react.
Here's another take on Dad Bods. Dad Bods = older men = $$$. Good looks, bad looks, nice body, overweight body - it doesn't matter because at the end of the day (or date) it's all about the dough. If you have dough...you're in the show. ?
https://youtu.be/YaMUpat1S94Haha yea kinda...but different kind of show. It's not alllll that different from hiring an escort at that point. The girl might sleep with/date/marry you, but there won't be desire on her part. Sleeping with you and maintaining appearances (while probably fvcking other guys on the side) is the name of the game.
I realize that plenty of guys are fine for any kind of sex, but for me that's such a turn off.
For the opposite perspective, check out that guys post above yours. Somehow not surprised in the slightest. Guys would do the same. We as a species go crazy for beautiful people.
LM wrote:
All you have to do is go out with two relatively equal looking dudes facial but one who is shredded and one who isn't and just pay attention to how females react.
Even if it's true that a muscular physique would serve as a tie-breaker in a situation where all else is equal, in practice all else is never equal and what places you into the "attractive enough" or "not attractive enough" category is going to be a combination of
* Face
* Height
* Personality/Swagger
* Income/Job
I think a perfect example of how women want a guy to look is the singer of the Artctic Monkeys (guy with the aviators on in the pic below)
* Dark, thick, wavy hair
* Tall, thin
* Handsome facial structure
* Good complexion
* Stylish clothes that match his "image" (rock star)
http://ksassets.timeincuk.net/wp/uploads/sites/55/2017/09/2012ArcticMonkeys02DC011211-920x584.jpg
Mr. Mojo Risin wrote:
I think a perfect example of how women want a guy to look is the singer of the Artctic Monkeys (guy with the aviators on in the pic below)
* Dark, thick, wavy hair
* Tall, thin
* Handsome facial structure
* Good complexion
* Stylish clothes that match his "image" (rock star)
http://ksassets.timeincuk.net/wp/uploads/sites/55/2017/09/2012ArcticMonkeys02DC011211-920x584.jpg
Lmao those aviators add like a solid point and a half to his looks:
https://smhttp-ssl-33667.nexcesscdn.net/manual/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/Alex-turner-hair-e1483451905674.jpgDecent lower third but shite tier eyes. He's almost below average without his lower third in play:
https://assets.radiox.co.uk/2017/30/alex-turner-performing-2016-1500897067-article-0.jpgIdeal is more like:
https://imgur.com/fWlQsJAWhich does have the qualities you mentioned above. It's just Turner has shite tier eyes and ruins his face.
Mr. Mojo Risin wrote:
LM wrote:
All you have to do is go out with two relatively equal looking dudes facial but one who is shredded and one who isn't and just pay attention to how females react.
Even if it's true that a muscular physique would serve as a tie-breaker in a situation where all else is equal, in practice all else is never equal and what places you into the "attractive enough" or "not attractive enough" category is going to be a combination of
* Face
* Height
* Personality/Swagger
* Income/Job
Just fvcking lol at thinking income/job matter for attractiveness. Lmao it might get you laid, but only cause she wants what you have. She's not going to be attracted to you...shes gonna put up with you and put on a nice face while she endures you. Better believe she will be sneaking out boning chad when you're not around.
It's like this: the physique that matters is - how she will look when she goes with you. Her physique. Her.
You are an accessory. LOL.
Got it?
It's not one thing. It's how you will set her up to be the woman she wants to be in everyone else's eyes.
Confidence is way over-rated. I know lots of guys who aren't particularly confident, but have no problem attracting women. What they do have is a certain amount of charm, sense of humor, thoughtfulness and reasonably good looks. They also don't have a single-minded obsession with something such as running, and instead have a wide range of interests (music, food, travel, etc.), and are generally interesting to talk to and spend time with.