Breaking News: Lie Detector results show Trump had unprotected sex with Stormy Daniels

Marksch wrote:

I don't think it is relevant whether or not YOU are worried about the blackmail angle, but the $130k and NDA show that TRUMP is worried about it..... And if he is worried about blackmail from an affair 12 years ago that most people seem not to care that much about, what do you think he feels about his shady dealings with the Russian mafia?

Possible shading dealings in Russia is something else. Let's focus on this.

I guess I don't understand the blackmail angle.

My thinking is Trump's team went around and paid off all the women he had slept with because he didn't want any November surprises.

How is he fearing blackmail? If he feared blackmail he WOULDN'T pay her off. I assume his henchmen went to her and said "don't talk about the affair". Here is some cash for your silence and she agreed. Is that a crime in some way? Now if campaign money is involved that's something separate but I'm curious how this is a possible crime to pay someone for their silence about an affair.

wejo wrote:

Possible shading dealings in Russia is something else. Let's focus on this.

I guess I don't understand the blackmail angle.

My thinking is Trump's team went around and paid off all the women he had slept with because he didn't want any November surprises.

How is he fearing blackmail? If he feared blackmail he WOULDN'T pay her off. I assume his henchmen went to her and said "don't talk about the affair". Here is some cash for your silence and she agreed. Is that a crime in some way? Now if campaign money is involved that's something separate but I'm curious how this is a possible crime to pay someone for their silence about an affair.

Paying off either for a story to publicize or preventing a story coming out which could affect an election is campaign contribution. It is a crime if that contribution hasn't been reported.

quite simple wrote:

wejo wrote:

How is he fearing blackmail? If he feared blackmail he WOULDN'T pay her off. I assume his henchmen went to her and said "don't talk about the affair". Here is some cash for your silence and she agreed. Is that a crime in some way? Now if campaign money is involved that's something separate but I'm curious how this is a possible crime to pay someone for their silence about an affair.

Paying off either for a story to publicize or preventing a story coming out which could affect an election is campaign contribution. It is a crime if that contribution hasn't been reported.

Also, if she pays the money back, as she intends, she is again free to talk. If paying her off to not talk is not a crime. Returning the money and then talking is also not a crime.

Free to talk wrote:

quite simple wrote:

Paying off either for a story to publicize or preventing a story coming out which could affect an election is campaign contribution. It is a crime if that contribution hasn't been reported.

Also, if she pays the money back, as she intends, she is again free to talk. If paying her off to not talk is not a crime. Returning the money and then talking is also not a crime.

That would be a breach of contract and might leave her subject to a lawsuit, but it would not be a crime.

She lies wrote:

She a whore and liar

Without a doubt, that's the exact reason he slept with her.

Once again, the chief idiot is an idiot. I'm not the first person to note how Ivanka and Daniels look so similar.

Follow the money wrote:

So she breaks the NDA. Who you think is backing her? George Soros? There are HUGE consequences to braking an NDA.

Posted the person who isn't a lawyer.

Lie detector is test is total BS. It is inadmissible in court for that reason. Even Hillary can pass it with flying colors. Can be easily faked.

sbeefyk2 wrote:

When will he be impeached?

If this was Obama, Republicans would burn the White House down. But, because it's Trump, they'll give him a pass.

That's how the game works.

Remember when the Republicans were screaming bloody murder about Obama's spending? They just outspent Democrats in less than 12 months.

pop_pop!_v2.2.1 wrote:

sbeefyk2 wrote:

When will he be impeached?

If this was Obama, Republicans would burn the White House down. But, because it's Trump, they'll give him a pass.

That's how the game works.

Remember when the Republicans were screaming bloody murder about Obama's spending? They just outspent Democrats in less than 12 months.

And they are giving you and I the bill!

Moo Goo wrote:

Lie detector is test is total BS. It is inadmissible in court for that reason. Even Hillary can pass it with flying colors. Can be easily faked.

All you need to do is compare a photo of Daniels to a photo of Ivanka.

It's as obvious as the sun in the sky.

Is that picture a still shot from her latest porn?

Hot women sleep with me who have power and/or money. In fact, I'd be upset if a President wasn't banging hot women on the side. Jack Kennedy had no problem with that, and Clinton was just a chubby chaser. Isn't that why you'd go after power in the first place?

Personally, I'd love if Trump came out and said "You know, I banged her, but she wasn't that great."

Karl Hungus wrote:

Hot women sleep with me who have power and/or money. In fact, I'd be upset if a President wasn't banging hot women on the side. Jack Kennedy had no problem with that, and Clinton was just a chubby chaser. Isn't that why you'd go after power in the first place?

Personally, I'd love if Trump came out and said "You know, I banged her, but she wasn't that great."

Which, is actually the right answer. It would have been over in a week.

Given how the Chief idiot is playing this one, chances are, there is far more serious stuff yet to be revealed, if it ever gets that far..

Karl Hungus wrote:

Hot women sleep with me who have power and/or money. In fact, I'd be upset if a President wasn't banging hot women on the side. Jack Kennedy had no problem with that, and Clinton was just a chubby chaser. Isn't that why you'd go after power in the first place?

Personally, I'd love if Trump came out and said "You know, I banged her, but she wasn't that great."

You’d love to hear about someone bragging about cheating on his wife? A person who is a leader and should be setting an example for American children? You’re reinforcing stereotypes about gay men having no moral compass and an inability to be monogamous. Good job.

None of this matters to anything or anyone, which is why some anti-Trumps are trying to spin a hypocrisy angle (which won't work with Trump) or an election law angle (which won't work either because the NDA wasn't with Trump).

Haters gonna hate, and it's really no more complicated than that. Who Trump slept with 12 years ago is totally meaningless.

Totally Meaningless wrote:

None of this matters to anything or anyone, which is why some anti-Trumps are trying to spin a hypocrisy angle (which won't work with Trump) or an election law angle (which won't work either because the NDA wasn't with Trump).

Haters gonna hate, and it's really no more complicated than that. Who Trump slept with 12 years ago is totally meaningless.

I’m a Republican. A man’s actions speak louder than words. A guy who cheats on his life is scum. I think that if that man is a Democrat, a Republican, and whatever party it suits Trump to represent. The man has no honor. That should mean something to people. It says a lot about you that you don’t care. When did honesty and integrity stop being important? It never did to good people. And if you think being a cheater is what makes America great, you are sadly mistaken.

*wife.

Lucas Tanner wrote:

Free to talk wrote:

Also, if she pays the money back, as she intends, she is again free to talk. If paying her off to not talk is not a crime. Returning the money and then talking is also not a crime.

That would be a breach of contract and might leave her subject to a lawsuit, but it would not be a crime.

The contract was never signed. So it can be voided.

Unedited Pic wrote:

Here is the full unedited pic.

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2016/09/10/16/3822A35000000578-0-image-a-5_1473521252287.jpg

Isn’t it because of this type of behaviour that Kevin Spacey is not starring in House of Cards anymore? The irony.