thedon2018 wrote:
Pretty straightforward question.
Turd
thedon2018 wrote:
Pretty straightforward question.
Turd
A lot
You might be able to get away with being an even split moderate runner in high school 1600m races but when you get to college if you don't have wheels move up or quit.
Good Example:
Mile PR: 4:01.89
400m PR: 47.97
Endurance:
10,000m: 29:05.00 (Felt like a jog)
calculo wrote:
clocking improvement
this is why i hate when you post. why do you insist in using such roundabout phrases. just say "faster times"
Ca$hclay wrote:
sdfsdf wrote:
All things equal with regards to training, the guy that can run a 50 flat open 400, while you're at 53, is going to win.
Although all things are never =^^ this is correct. A miler with 52ish 400 speed is going to get blown out of the water when they toe the line 50 guys with 50 400 speed who are similarly situated aerobically. The mile is a speed-based event.
Doesn't this hold true then for any event? A marathoner with 58 sec 400 speed is going to get blown out of the water when they toe the line with 50 guys with 52 sec 400 speed who are similarly situated aerobically.
Cade Flatt with yet another DNF, this time in the SEC Championships
Caitlin Clark thinks she can beat Eagles draft pick Cooper Dejean in 1 on 1
What is the threshold that separates a "hobbyjogger" from a "sub-elite" runner?
NCAA D1 Conference Outdoor Championships Live Results and Discussion Thread
Do "running influencers" harm the competitive nature of the sport?