nother bona fide fraud program wrote:
In 2008, what was described as “massive fraud†associated with entrance of Somali refugees relying on the P-3 family reunification program was exposed through required DNA testing and the program was suspended.
Similar to what nerdy American men do with mail-order brides who marry foreign women for their money--jailbird Tim Danielson is such a nerd. With the exception they get away with any special testing.
Democrats lose again!!!!!
^Moderator wrote:
EPIC Flagpole wrote:You were outed as a moderator on the t'Rump 'naguration thread. Have you moved here to build this one up--clickbate? Change your handle; then proceed.
LaughingOutLoud wrote:
^ Moderator . . . YAWN! + HI EPIC FP!!!!
Now post with the DFF name and the silly iconsâ—ï¸ðŸ˜‚😂😂
🤠🇺🇸
Enjoying this particular trollage. *Of course* the OP misstated SCOTUS's action--the better to bait you with!
I'm gonna go with 7/10. I think this one has legs.
Rater of trollage wrote:
Enjoying this particular trollage. *Of course* the OP misstated SCOTUS's action--the better to bait you with!
I'm gonna go with 7/10. I think this one has legs.
Someone who understands the art of writing an LRC headlie.
Rater of trollage wrote:
Enjoying this particular trollage. *Of course* the OP misstated SCOTUS's action--the better to bait you with!
I'm gonna go with 7/10. I think this one has legs.
The OP made his "claim" based on Trump Tweets.
tRump aTwitter wrote:
The OP made his "claim" based on Trump Tweets.
It was not Tweets, it was an official presidential statement.
https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2017/06/26/statement-president-donald-j-trumpDiscoGary wrote:
The law is actually very clear. The President can keep any group of people out of the country for any reason he wants.
No, that's not what the statute says. It says:
Whenever the President finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States...
Under the words of the statute, the President has to "find" that letting this people in "would be detrimental to the interests of the United States..." People disagree on exactly what the President has to do to "find" that people would harm the interests of the US. But everyone agrees that "finding" does not mean "the President thinks it's a good idea."
Trump Twittered right before the OP started this thread.
https://mobile.twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/879405223399350272
FYI: Trump Tweeted 9-O (Oh!) not 9-0. Some thing will never change; likes Trump's sub 9O IQ.
Learn to count wrote:
2) Continue injunction for aliens without connection to the US? Scotus said "No," and because there was no dissent, this decision appears to be 9-0..
Maybe it's not worth the time to write a dissent at this stage.
http://www.scotusblog.com/2012/10/scholarship-highlight-the-supreme-courts-misuse-of-per-curiam-opinions/Thomas Jefferson: “The practice [of writing per curiam opinions] is certainly convenient for the lazy, the modest, & the incompetent.â€
When courts use an anonymous veil, they lose not only the environment of transparency and individual responsibility, but often well-reasoned explanations as well.
Ruth Ginsburg (before elevation to SCOTUS): “Judges generally do not labor over unpublished judgments and memoranda, or even published per curiam opinions, with the same intensity they devote to signed opinions.â€
Learn to count wrote:
DiscoGary wrote:The law is actually very clear. The President can keep any group of people out of the country for any reason he wants.
No, that's not what the statute says. It says:
Whenever the President finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States...
Under the words of the statute, the President has to "find" that letting this people in "would be detrimental to the interests of the United States..." People disagree on exactly what the President has to do to "find" that people would harm the interests of the US. But everyone agrees that "finding" does not mean "the President thinks it's a good idea."
That it means it's completely up to the President and that no other authority has any say in it. Trump has already "found" that people from seven countries would be detrimental. He was elected because he was the only candidate who "found" that truth. That judge attempted to negate the election results through judicial activism.
DiscoGary wrote:
Trump has already "found" that people from seven countries would be detrimental.
How did he manage to have "found" that since he claimed it before he was elected presivfefe? And why did the exempt Saudi where the 9/11 hijackers came from, and is the country of birth if bin Laden? ... Oh that is right, Saudi is letting tRump build bigly hotels there. While the banned countries haven't allowed him to build hotels. If they do then tRump will "find" those counties to be good and you, DiscoGarry, will blindly approve of tRump's improvement for $$$ into his pocket.
Easy to sneak through cracks wrote:
Yep, the Obama holdovers at State's Bureau of Population, Refugees, and Migration are loving this.
Trump just cares that he looks good on Twitter, not that anything meaningful will change.
The DHS is happy about it.
The Supreme Court today has allowed the Department of Homeland Security to largely implement the President's Executive Order and take rational and necessary steps to protect our nation from persons looking to enter and potentially do harm. The granting of a partial stay of the circuit injunctions with regard to many aliens abroad restores to the Executive Branch crucial and long-held constitutional authority to defend our national borders.
The Department will provide additional details on implementation after consultation with the Departments of Justice and State. The implementation of the Executive Order will be done professionally, with clear and sufficient public notice, particularly to potentially affected travelers, and in coordination with partners in the travel industry.
DiscoGary wrote:
That it means it's completely up to the President and that no other authority has any say in it. Trump has already "found" that people from seven countries would be detrimental. He was elected because he was the only candidate who "found" that truth. That judge attempted to negate the election results through judicial activism.
0/10! Even by LRC troll standards, this is a pathetic. I'd tell you to try harder, but I'm pretty sure you are doing your best.
Sad.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DDR0C5fXkAAknrF.jpg:largeEPIC Flagpole wrote:
Wait, wait, wait- three pages about the SCOTUS siding with the ban and NOTHING from Agip, Flagpole, and the other morans??!!! WTF? This is hilarious.
They FLAGPOLE weekly now!!!
Sally Yates goshome DEVASTATED wrote:
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DDR0C5fXkAAknrF.jpg:large
Stopping mocking the Harvard Law professor.
None of the 9 referred to it as a "Muslim ban" either.
They mocked him then (ALL CAPS)...
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/829836231802515457
They mocked him [Trump] then (ALL CAPS)...
Well, if we are recalling what they Tweeted back then...
https://twitter.com/HillaryClinton/status/829846842150096896Actually, I think this Trump tweet is the best at this juncture.
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/325999319515791360
